Rocker bottom shoe

File:Mbt-schuh.jpg rocker sole shoes]]

Rocker sole shoes have been referenced in publications as early as 1990.{{Cite journal|last1=Schaff |first1=PS |last2=Cavanagh |first2=PR |year=1990 |title=Shoes for the insensitive foot: The effect of a "rocker bottom" shoe modification on plantar pressure distribution |journal=Foot and Ankle |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages= 129–140|doi= 10.1177/107110079001100303|pmid=2074080 |s2cid=23507044 }} Branded generic rocker sole shoes were popularized for the mass market in the late 1990s and 2000s by the Swiss Masai company as Masai Barefoot Technology or MBT.{{citation |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/27/AR2006012701898.html |title=A Sneaker That Shoos the Fat? |first=Linda |last=Hales |date=28 January 2006 |work=WashingtonPost.com |accessdate=6 July 2010}}{{Cite web|url=http://au.mbt.com/Footer/Company/About-Us.aspx |publisher=Masai Marketing & Trading AG |year=2010 |title=About MBT}} According to Swiss Masai, the market concept originated with engineer and former athlete Karl Müller, who intended they would "simulate the challenge of walking barefoot on soft earth". Various other sports footwear companies followed suit with their own branded versions of the heel-to-toe rocker targeted at the exercise equipment market. A news report estimated that 200,000 pairs of modern heel-to-toe rocker sole shoes were sold in the US in 2005.

Rocker soles may replace regular soles on any style of footwear. Some rocker bottom shoes are purpose-built to reduce the function or replace the lost function of a joint. For example, a person with a hallux rigidus (stiff big toe) may use a rocker bottom shoe to replace the flexion lost at the metatarsal joint. Rocker bottom shoes are also used to compensate for the lost range of motion, however caused, at the tibiotalar joint (ankle joint). In such cases, the wearer maintains solid and stable footing while standing, but the rock of the heel assists with the propulsive phase of gait, making walking more natural and less painful to the affected joints. Beneficiaries of this type of sole modification include people suffering from arthritis or any other disorder or injury causing pain and/or loss of motion in foot joints.{{Citation needed|date=September 2011}}

Proponents of modern heel-to-toe rocker sole shoes claim that because the foot of the wearer is slightly destabilised, certain lesser-worked muscle groups in the leg, such as the core and gluteus, are challenged more than they are normally. As such they are purported to derive health benefits for the wearer, such as improved posture and tighter muscles.

The NICE guidelines in the UK state that healthcare professionals should not offer rocker-bottom shoes as a treatment for people with lower back pain or sciatica.{{Cite web|url=https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59/chapter/Recommendations|title=Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: Assessment and management|date=November 2016|website=|series=NICE guideline NG59|publisher=National Institute for Health and Care Excellence|language=en-GB|access-date=8 May 2017}} No studies found significant health benefits in the short- or long-term, and several found significant harms in terms of worsened anxiety and depression among people who had lower back pain.{{Cite web|url=https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59/evidence|title=Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: Assessment and management – Evidence|date=November 2016|website=|series=NICE guideline NG59|publisher=National Institute for Health and Care Excellence|at=Assessment and non-invasive treatments: Methods, evidence and recommendations (page 350 of [https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59/evidence/full-guideline-assessment-and-noninvasive-treatments-pdf-2726158003 linked pdf])|language=en-GB|access-date=8 May 2017|quote=When rocker sole shoes were compared with flat sole shoes no benefit was observed favouring rocker sole shoes for any of the reported outcomes in either the short or long term follow-up. It was noted that health-related quality of life was in fact, worse in the rocker sole group at both the short and longer term time points.}} One study found that flat-bottomed shoes may be better for people whose lower back pain is aggravated by walking or standing.{{Cite journal|last2=Lewis|first2=JS|last3=Shortland|first3=AP|last4=Morrissey|first4=MC|last5=Critchley|first5=D|year=2013|title=Effectiveness of Rocker Sole Shoes in the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial|journal=Spine|publisher=Lippincott Williams & Wilkins|volume=38|issue=22|pages=1905–1912|doi=10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a69956|pmid=23928715|last1=MacRae|first1=Catharine Siân|s2cid=205520114}}

Rocker-bottom shoes do not increase muscle use in the legs or burn more calories.{{Cite journal|last1=Santo|first1=Antonio S.|last2=Roper|first2=Jenevieve L.|last3=Dufek|first3=Janet S.|last4=Mercer|first4=John A.|date=1 September 2012|title=Rocker-bottom, profile-type shoes do not increase lower extremity muscle activity or energy cost of walking|journal=Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research|volume=26|issue=9|pages=2426–2431|doi=10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823f8b71|issn=1533-4287|pmid=22076094|s2cid=207504327|doi-access=free}} A 2010 University of Wisconsin study commissioned by the American Council on Exercise compared exercise wearing rocker bottom shoes and regular running shoes. The study found there was no fitness benefit to wearing rocker sole shoes. The study was cited in a 2011 class-action lawsuits alleging false advertising by New Balance, Reebok, and other manufacturers.{{cite news| url=http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/health/articles/2011/01/05/new_balance_sued_over_toning_shoe_ads/ | work=The Boston Globe | first=Jenn | last=Abelson | title=New Balance sued over toning-shoe ads | date=5 January 2011}}

A 2009 study raised concern that use of rocker sole shoes may increase the risk of falls.{{Cite journal|author=Albright B.C. & Woodhull-Smith W.M. |date=28 March 2009 |title=Rocker bottom soles alter the postural response to backward translation during stance |journal=Gait & Posture |volume= 30|issue= 1|pmid= 19329317 |pages=45–9|doi=10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.02.012}} While research by Wang (2009) indicates that this may not be a problem in able-bodied individuals, it has been demonstrated to be a concern in older individuals who experience balance problems.{{cite news| url=http://www.footwire.com/rocker-bottom-shoe-safety/ | work=Foot Wire | title=Is It Safe to Wear Rocker Bottom Shoes? | date=14 January 2015}}

• List of shoe styles
• Barefoot running

{{Reflist}}

1. {{Cite book|first=Bill |last=Bird |year=1999 |title=Self Help Guide for the Footsore |publisher=Wise Owl Press |isbn=978-0-9537622-0-0}}
2. {{Cite book|first1=Marvin E. |last1=Levin |first2=Lawrence W. |last2=O'Neal |first3=John H. |last3=Bowker |first4=Michael A. |last4=Pfeifer |year=2008 |title=Levin and O'Neal's the diabetic foot |editor1-first=John H. |editor1-last=Bowker |editor2-first=Michael A. |editor2-last=Pfeifer |publisher=Elsevier Health Sciences |isbn=978-0-323-04145-4}}
3. {{Cite book|first1=Wendy |last1=Tyrrell |first2=Gwenda |last2=Carter |year=2008 |title=Therapeutic Footwear: A Comprehensive Guide |publisher=Elsevier Health Sciences |isbn=978-0-443-06883-6}}
4. {{Cite book|first=Ben |last=Yates |year=2009 |title=Merriman's assessment of the lower limb |publisher=Elsevier Health Sciences |isbn=978-0-08-045107-7}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Rocker Bottom Shoe}}

Category:Shoes

Category:Exercise equipment