Ryongchon disaster

{{Short description|2004 train wreck in North Korea}}{{Infobox public transit accident|name=Ryongchŏn train disaster|image=2000년대 초반 서울소방 소방공무원(소방관) 활동 사진 dscn0107.jpg|caption=The wreckage of the train after the disaster.|date=April 22nd, 2004|time=4:00 PM GMT|deaths=•54-162 (official North Korean claim)

•3,000+ (South Korean estimate)|injuries=3,000-6,000+|damage=~1,850 buildings destroyed or severely damaged, ~6,450 buildings lightly or moderately damaged.|trains=Two cargo trains carrying explosive material|location=Ryongchŏn, Ryongchŏn County, North Korea}}{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2012}}

The Ryongchŏn disaster was a train disaster that occurred on 22 April 2004 in the town of Ryongchŏn, North Korea, near the border with the People's Republic of China. At least 54 people were killed, including some Syrian scientists.

The disaster occurred when flammable cargo exploded at Ryongchon Station at around 13:00 local time (04:00 GMT). The news was released by South Korean media outlets, which reported that up to 3,000 people had been killed or injured in the blast and subsequent fires.{{cite web|title=Mass Casualties Feared in N. Korea Train Blast|website=Fox News|url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/mass-casualties-feared-in-n-korea-train-blast|access-date=10 March 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130312073800/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,117872,00.html|archive-date=March 12, 2013|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}} The North Korean government declared a state of emergency in the region, but little information has been made public by the North Korean government. Shortly after the accident, the North Korean government cut telephone lines to the outside world.{{cite news|url=http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2004-04/a-2004-04-24-2-1.cfm?moddate=2004-04-24|title='Electrical Contact' Caused Train Collision, North Korea Says|date=April 24, 2004|publisher=Voice of America|accessdate=October 29, 2009}}{{dead link|date=April 2025|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/3649655.stm|title=N Korea train blast 'kills many'|date=April 22, 2004|publisher=BBC|accessdate=October 29, 2009 | location=London}}

As of 2024, it remains the second-deadliest rail accident in North Korea, and the third-deadliest in Korean history, being surpassed by the Gupo Mugunghwa-Ho Derailment (South Korea) and the Dancheon train disaster (North Korea).

Effects

The Red Cross was allowed into the area, in an unusual concession from the North Korean authorities, becoming the only outside agency to see the disaster area. According to the initial agency report, 160 people were killed and 1,300 were injured in the disaster.{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3651705.stm|title=New theory on N Korea rail blast|date=April 23, 2004|publisher=BBC|accessdate=October 29, 2009 | location=London}} Later reports include updated figures: 160 dead and 1,300 injured. However, official casualty reports the following day listed 54 deaths and 1,249 injuries.{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/24/world/north-korea-appeals-for-help-after-railway-explosion.html|title=North Korea Appeals for Help After Railway Explosion|author=James Brooke|work=The New York Times|date=April 24, 2004|accessdate=April 18, 2014}} A wide area was reported to have been affected, with some airborne debris reportedly falling across the border in China. (Satellite pictures published by the BBC purported to show widespread damage in the town, but these were later retracted; they actually show Baghdad from an earlier date, and the strong black-white contrast was misinterpreted.{{cite web|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/eye/imint-note-010.htm|title=It was bound to happen – Wrong satellite images used to depict North Korean Blast|date=April 23, 2004|publisher=GlobalSecurity.org|accessdate=October 29, 2009}}) The Red Cross reported that 1,850 houses and buildings had been destroyed and another 6,350 had been damaged.

On 23 April 2004, the United Nations received an appeal for international aid from North Korea's government. The following day, a few diplomats and aid workers were allowed into the country to assess the disaster.{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3655613.stm|title=North Korea station 'obliterated'|date=April 24, 2004|publisher=BBC|accessdate=October 29, 2009 | location=London}}

Cause

The cause and nature of the accident have been the subject of considerable speculation, with several different accounts being reported.

  • It was initially reported that the explosion was the result of a collision between two trains carrying gasoline (petrol) and liquified petroleum gas, possibly donated by China to alleviate the ongoing North Korean fuel shortage.
  • Diplomats and aid workers in North Korea later suggested that the explosion took place when explosive materials were being shunted in rail cars, possibly being triggered by a collision with a live electric power cable. This is corroborated by reports by North Korean officials to Russia's Itar-Tass news agency, and by government sources to Japan's Kyodo news service. The material was said to be intended for use in canal construction. The official Chinese news agency Xinhua reported that there had been a leak of ammonium nitrate, a substance which is used in some explosives, as a fertilizer, and in rocket fuel. The Sunday Telegraph attributed the disaster to "the explosion of a train carrying ammonium nitrate".Sunday Telegraph, p. April 1, 25 2004

KCNA, the state news service, apparently confirmed the Xinhua report by stating the incident was "due to the electrical contact caused by carelessness during the shunting of wagons loaded with ammonium-nitrate fertilizer".{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3652157.stm|title=Rumours linger over N Korea blast|date=April 24, 2004|publisher=BBC|accessdate=October 29, 2009 | location=London}}

North Korean leader Kim Jong-il passed through the station several hours before the explosion as he returned from a meeting in China. It was suggested that the explosion might have been an assassination attempt, but South Korean intelligence services believed that it was an accident. One theory is that one of the trains involved was carrying fuel from China. If the incident did involve a train collision, it has been suggested that the cause of the accident may have been a miscommunication related to the changes in train timetables due to Kim Jong-il's itinerary.

Other observers have suggested that the poor state of North Korea's railway system may have contributed to the disaster. It accounts for about 90% of freight transport; a lack of fuel forces most vehicles off roads.{{citation needed|date = April 2014}} The railway, built by the Japanese during their occupation of the country, is reported to be in poor repair, with elderly rolling stock running no faster than {{convert|65|km/h|mph}} (in part due to the poor state of North Korea's electrical supply).{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/23/world/3000-casualties-reported-in-north-korean-rail-blast.html|title=3,000 Casualties Reported in North Korean Rail Blast|last=Brooke|first=James|date=April 23, 2004|work=The New York Times|accessdate=October 29, 2009}}

North Korean government response

According to North Korean defector Thae Yong-ho, Kim Jong-il ordered the execution of several transport officials after the disaster.{{cite web|url=http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2017/01/13/Ex-North-Korea-diplomat-Pyongyang-makes-a-fortune-in-insurance-fraud/5721484323375/?spt=su&or=btn_tw|title=Ex-North Korea diplomat: Pyongyang makes a fortune in insurance fraud|publisher=|accessdate=June 1, 2018}}

See also

References

{{reflist|colwidth=30em}}