SN 1006

Egyptian astrologer and astronomer Ali ibn Ridwan, writing in a commentary on Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos, stated that the "spectacle was a large circular body, 2{{frac|1|2}} to 3 times as large as Venus. The sky was shining because of its light. The intensity of its light was a little more than a quarter that of Moon light" (or perhaps "than the light of the Moon when one-quarter illuminated").{{cite book

| last1 = Murdin | first1 = Paul

| last2 = Murdin | first2 = Lesley

| year = 1985

| title = Supernovae

| publisher = Cambridge University Press

| isbn = 978-0-521-30038-4

| pages = [https://archive.org/details/supernovae00murd/page/14 14]–16

| url = https://archive.org/details/supernovae00murd

| url-access = registration

}} Like all other observers, Ali ibn Ridwan noted that the new star was low on the southern horizon. Some astrologers interpreted the event as a portent of plague and famine.

The most northerly sighting is recorded in the Annales Sangallenses maiores of the Abbey of Saint Gall in Switzerland, at a latitude of 47.5° north.{{cite web

|title=E-codices – Bibliothèque virtuelle des manuscrits en Suisse

|url=http://www.e-codices.unifr.ch/fr/csg/0915/222

}} Monks at St. Gall provided independent data as to its magnitude and location in the sky, writing that

{{quote|[i]n a wonderful manner this was sometimes contracted, sometimes diffused, and moreover sometimes extinguished ... It was seen likewise for three months in the inmost limits of the south, beyond all the constellations which are seen in the sky.The Arabic and Latin texts given in {{cite journal

| last = Goldstein | first = Bernard R.

| year = 1965

| title = Evidence for a supernova of A.D. 1006

| journal = The Astronomical Journal

| volume = 70 | issue = 1 | pages = 105–114

| bibcode = 1965AJ.....70..105G

| doi = 10.1086/109679

}}}}

This description is often taken as probable evidence that the supernova was of type Ia.

In The Book of Healing, Iranian philosopher Ibn Sina reported observing this supernova from northeastern Iran. He reported it as a transient celestial object which was stationary and/or tail-less (a star among the stars), that it remained for close to 3 months getting fainter and fainter until it disappeared, that it threw out sparks, that is, it was scintillating and very bright, and that the color changed with time.{{cite journal

| first1 = R. | last1 = Neuhäuser

| first2 = C. | last2 = Ehrig-Eggert

| first3 = P. | last3 = Kunitzsch

| year = 2016

| title = An Arabic report about supernova SN 1006 by Ibn Sīnā

| journal = Astronomische Nachrichten

| volume = 338 | issue = 1 | pages = 19–25

| publisher=Wiley Online Library (2017)

| url = https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.201613200

| doi = 10.1002/asna.201613200

| arxiv = 1604.03798 | s2cid = 119296453

}}

Some sources state that the star was bright enough to cast shadows; it was certainly seen during daylight hours for some time.

According to Songshi, the official history of the Song dynasty (sections 56 and 461), the star seen on May 1, 1006, appeared to the south of constellation Di, between Lupus and Centaurus. It shone so brightly that objects on the ground could be seen at night.

By December, it was again sighted in the constellation Di. The Chinese astrologer Zhou Keming, who was on his return to Kaifeng from his duty in Guangdong, interpreted the star to the emperor on May 30 as an auspicious star, yellow in color and brilliant in its brightness, that would bring great prosperity to the state over which it appeared. The reported color yellow should be taken with some suspicion, however, because Zhou may have chosen a favorable color for political reasons.

There appear to have been two distinct phases in the early evolution of this supernova. There was first a three-month period at which it was at its brightest; after this period it diminished, then returned for a period of about eighteen months.

Petroglyphs by the Hohokam in White Tank Mountain Regional Park, Arizona, and by the Ancestral Puebloans in Chaco Culture National Historical Park, New Mexico, have been interpreted as the first known North American representations of the supernova, though other researchers remain skeptical.{{cite magazine

|title=Did ancient Americans record a supernova?

|date=June 7, 2006

|magazine=Sky and Telescope

|url=http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/did-ancient-americans-record-a-supernova/

|access-date=April 14, 2018

}} The White Tank Mountain Regional Park petroglyph depicts a "star-like object" over a scorpion symbol. It has been contested that the scorpion represents the constellation Scorpius given a lack of evidence that the Native Americans interpreted the stars of that constellation as a scorpion.

Earlier observations discovered from Yemen may indicate a sighting of SN 1006 on April 17, two weeks before its previously assumed earliest observation.{{cite journal

|last1=Rada |first1=Wafiq

|last2=Heuhaeuser |first2=Ralph

|date=April 2015

|title=Supernova SN 1006 in two historic Yemeni reports

|journal=Astronomische Nachrichten

|volume=336 |issue=3 |pages=249–257

|arxiv=1508.06126 |doi=10.1002/asna.201412152

|bibcode=2015AN....336..249R |s2cid=119234335

}}

File:SN 1006 Remnant Expansion Comparison.jpeg

SN 1006's associated supernova remnant from this event was not identified until 1965, when Doug Milne and Frank Gardner used the Parkes radio telescope to demonstrate a connection to known radio source PKS 1459−41.

{{cite journal

|last1=Gardner |first1=F.F.

|last2=Milne |first2=D.K.

|year=1965

|title=The supernova of A.D. 1006

|journal=The Astronomical Journal

|volume=70 |pages=754

|bibcode=1965AJ.....70..754G |doi=10.1086/109813

|doi-access=free

}}

This is located near the star Beta Lupi, displaying a 30 arcmin circular shell.

{{cite journal

|last=Green |first=D.A.

|year=2014

|title=A catalogue of 294 Galactic supernova remnants

|journal=Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India

|volume=42 |issue=2 |pages=47–58

|arxiv=1409.0637 |bibcode=2014BASI...42...47G

}}

X-ray and optical emission from this remnant have also been detected, and during 2010 the H.E.S.S. gamma-ray observatory announced the detection of very-high-energy gamma-ray emission from the remnant.

{{cite journal

|last1=Acero |first1=F.

|display-authors=etal

|year=2010

|title=First detection of VHE γ-rays from SN 1006 by HESS

|journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics

|volume=516 |pages=A62

|doi=10.1051/0004-6361/200913916 |s2cid=32741873

|bibcode=2010A&A...516A..62A |arxiv=1004.2124

|url=http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/bib_query?arXiv:1004.2124

}}

No associated neutron star or black hole has been found, which is the situation expected for the remnant of a Type Ia supernova (a class of explosion believed to completely disrupt its progenitor star).

{{cite book

|last=Wheeler | first=J.C.

|year=2000

|title=Cosmic Catastrophes: Supernovae, gamma-ray bursts, and adventures in hyperspace

|publisher=Cambridge University Press

|isbn=978-0-521-65195-0 |oclc = 42690140

|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=s3SFQgAACAAJ

}}

A survey in 2012 to find any surviving companions of the SN 1006 progenitor found no subgiant or giant companion stars,

{{cite journal

|last1=González Hernández |first1=J.I. |last2=Ruiz-Lapuente |first2=P.

|last3=Tabernero |first3=H.M. |last4=Montes |first4=D.

|last5=Canal |first5=R. |last6=Méndez |first6=J.

|last7=Bedin |first7=L.R.

|year=2012

|title=No surviving evolved companions of the progenitor of SN 1006

|journal=Nature

|volume=489 |issue=7417 |pages=533–536

|pmid=23018963 |s2cid=4431391 |bibcode=2012Natur.489..533G

|doi=10.1038/nature11447 |arxiv=1210.1948

}}

indicating that SN 1006 most likely had double degenerate progenitors; that is, the merging of two white dwarf stars.

Remnant SNR G327.6+14.6 has an estimated distance of 2.2 kpc from Earth, making the true linear diameter approximately 20 parsecs.

{{clear}}

{{Further|Near-Earth supernova}}

Research has suggested that type Ia supernovae can irradiate the Earth with significant amounts of gamma-ray flux,{{cite web | first=Michael | last=Richmond | date=2005-04-08 | title=Will a nearby supernova endanger life on Earth? | website=tass-survey.org | url=http://www.tass-survey.org/richmond/answers/snrisks.txt | access-date=2006-03-30 | url-status=dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070306114344/http://www.tass-survey.org/richmond/answers/snrisks.txt | archive-date=2007-03-06 }} compared with the typical flux from the Sun, up to distances on the order of 1 kiloparsec. SN 1006 lies well beyond 1 kiloparsec, and it did not appear to have significant effects on Earth. However, a signal of its outburst can be found in nitrate deposits in Antarctic ice.{{cite news | title=Ancient supernovae found written into the Antarctic ice | date=2009-03-04 | magazine=New Scientist | issue=2698 | url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126984.800-ancient-supernovae-found-written-into-the-antarctic-ice.html | access-date=2009-03-09 }}

• History of supernova observation
• List of supernova candidates
• List of supernova remnants
• List of supernovae

{{reflist|25em}}

{{Commons category|Supernova 1006}}

• [http://www.ub.edu/web/ub/en/menu_eines/noticies/2012/09/049.html Cause of Supernova SN 1006 Revealed] (27 Sept 2012 @ Universitat de Barcelona)
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20070615165254/http://www.jlab.org/~jiang/supernova/SN1006.ppt Stories of SN 1006 in Chinese literature] (PowerPoint)
• [http://www.noao.edu/outreach/press/pr03/pr0304.html National Optical Observatory Press Release for March 2003] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030402121341/http://www.noao.edu/outreach/press/pr03/pr0304.html |date=April 2, 2003 }}
• [http://www.astronomy.com/news/2006/06/rock-art-records-an-ancient-blast Simulation of SN 1006 as it appeared in the southern sky at midnight, May 1, 1006]
• [http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/surveys/snrs/snrs.G327.6+14.6.html Entry for supernova remnant of SN 1006] from the Galactic Supernova Remnant Catalogue
• [http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2005/sn1006/ X-ray image of supernova remnant of SN 1006], as seen with the Chandra X-ray Observatory
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20070930190012/http://www.worldhistoryblog.com/2006/06/ancient-rock-art-may-depict-exploding.html Ancient rock art may depict exploding star]
• [http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap030317.html Astronomy Picture of the Day (APOD)], March 17, 2003
• [http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080704.html Astronomy Picture of the Day (APOD)], July 4, 2008
• [http://www.saudiaramcoworld.com/issue/200604/the.scholar.s.supernova.htm Margaret Donsbach: ''The Scholar's Supernova] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090207190544/http://saudiaramcoworld.com/issue/200604/the.scholar.s.supernova.htm |date=February 7, 2009 }}
• {{WikiSky|15.04,-41.95|z=8}}

{{Supernovae}}

{{Portal bar|Astronomy|Stars|Outer space}}

{{Sky|15|02|08|-|41|57|00|7200}}

Category:Lupus (constellation)

Category:Supernova remnants

Category:Supernovae

Category:1006

06

06

Category:Historical supernovae