Saint Thomas Aquinas (Chesterton)

{{short description|1933 book by G. K. Chesterton}}

{{italic title}}

Saint Thomas Aquinas is a book by G. K. Chesterton, published in 1933.

In the introductory note of the book, Chesterton writes that the aim of the work is to be a popular sketch of historical character, who ought to be better known, especially for those who have hardly ever heard of him and are not likely to be of communion of Thomas Aquinas.[https://archive.org/details/saint-thomas-aquinas-by-g-k-chesterton/page/n1/mode/2up Saint Thomas Aquinas: Introductory Note] at Internet Archive

Chesterton begins by comparing Aquinas with St. Francis of Assisi. In spite of their obvious contrasts, they were doing the same great work; one in the study, the other in the street. Neither of them brought anything new to Christianity. In the process, each of them "reaffirmed the Incarnation, by bringing God back to earth". St. Thomas is the champion of God, The Creator. He affirms what Scripture says, that God created the physical world and all that is in it, and said that it was good. By being the champion of God the Creator against the heresy of the Manichees, who considered the physical world evil, St. Thomas was ultimately defending God's most precious and mysterious creation, life. As a contrast to Thomas Aquinas, Chesterton writes, contemporary philosophers claimed, that if at one point we just sacrifice our sanity, everything else will make sense. But none of the modern philosophies make any sense to the man on the street. Surprisingly, the philosophy that is closest to the mind of the man on the street is the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas. Firmly rooted in reality, fully respectful of human dignity, and, in every sense of the word, reasonable.Dale Ahlquist: [https://www.chesterton.org/lecture-67/ Lecture 67: St. Thomas Aquinas] The Society of Gilbert Keith Chesterton

Étienne Gilson praised Chesterton's book on Thomas Aquinas: "I consider it as being, without possible comparison, the best book ever written on Saint Thomas{{nbsp}}[...] the few readers who have spent twenty or thirty years in studying St. Thomas Aquinas, and who, perhaps, have themselves published two or three volumes on the subject, cannot fail to perceive that the so-called 'wit' of Chesterton has put their scholarship to shame."{{Citation |last=Gilson |first=Etienne |title=Guide to Thomas Aquinas |pages=6–7 |year=1987 |editor-last=Pieper |editor-first=Josef |contribution=Letter to Chesterton's editor |publisher=University of Notre Dame Press}} Jacques Maritain and Anton Pegis have also appreciated the book in similar manner.[https://philpapers.org/rec/CHESTA St. Thomas Aquinas] Philpapers.org