Separable algebra

{{Distinguish|text = an étale algebra}}

In mathematics, a separable algebra is a kind of semisimple algebra. It is a generalization to associative algebras of the notion of a separable field extension.

Definition and first properties

A homomorphism of (unital, but not necessarily commutative) rings

: K \to A

is called separable if the multiplication map

: \begin{array}{rccc} \mu :& A \otimes_K A &\to& A \\

& a \otimes b &\mapsto & ab

\end{array}

admits a section

: \sigma: A \to A \otimes_K A

that is a homomorphism of A-A-bimodules.

If the ring K is commutative and K \to A maps K into the center of A, we call A a separable algebra over K.

It is useful to describe separability in terms of the element

: p := \sigma(1) = \sum a_i \otimes b_i \in A \otimes_K A

The reason is that a section σ is determined by this element. The condition that σ is a section of μ is equivalent to

: \sum a_i b_i = 1

and the condition that σ is a homomorphism of A-A-bimodules is equivalent to the following requirement for any a in A:

: \sum a a_i \otimes b_i = \sum a_i \otimes b_i a.

Such an element p is called a separability idempotent, since regarded as an element of the algebra A \otimes A^{\rm op} it satisfies p^2 = p.

Examples

For any commutative ring R, the (non-commutative) ring of n-by-n matrices M_n(R) is a separable R-algebra. For any 1 \le j \le n, a separability idempotent is given by \sum_{i=1}^n e_{ij} \otimes e_{ji}, where e_{ij} denotes the elementary matrix which is 0 except for the entry in the {{nowrap|(i, j)}} entry, which is 1. In particular, this shows that separability idempotents need not be unique.

= Separable algebras over a field =

A field extension L/K of finite degree is a separable extension if and only if L is separable as an associative K-algebra. If L/K has a primitive element a with irreducible polynomial p(x) = (x - a) \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} b_i x^i, then a separability idempotent is given by \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a^i \otimes_K \frac{b_i}{p'(a)}. The tensorands are dual bases for the trace map: if \sigma_1,\ldots,\sigma_{n} are the distinct K-monomorphisms of L into an algebraic closure of K, the trace mapping Tr of L into K is defined by Tr(x) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \sigma_i(x). The trace map and its dual bases make explicit L as a Frobenius algebra over K.

More generally, separable algebras over a field K can be classified as follows: they are the same as finite products of matrix algebras over finite-dimensional division algebras whose centers are finite-dimensional separable field extensions of the field K. In particular: Every separable algebra is itself finite-dimensional. If K is a perfect field – for example a field of characteristic zero, or a finite field, or an algebraically closed field – then every extension of K is separable, so that separable K-algebras are finite products of matrix algebras over finite-dimensional division algebras over field K. In other words, if K is a perfect field, there is no difference between a separable algebra over K and a finite-dimensional semisimple algebra over K.

It can be shown by a generalized theorem of Maschke that an associative K-algebra A is separable if for every field extension L/K the algebra A\otimes_K L is semisimple.

= Group rings =

If K is commutative ring and G is a finite group such that the order of G is invertible in K, then the group algebra K[G] is a separable K-algebra.{{sfn|Ford|2017|loc=§4.2|ps=none}} A separability idempotent is given by \frac{1}{o(G)} \sum_{g \in G} g \otimes g^{-1}.

Equivalent characterizations of separability

There are several equivalent definitions of separable algebras. A K-algebra A is separable if and only if it is projective when considered as a left module of A^e in the usual way.{{sfn|Reiner|2003|p=102|ps=none}} Moreover, an algebra A is separable if and only if it is flat when considered as a right module of A^e in the usual way.

Separable algebras can also be characterized by means of split extensions: A is separable over K if and only if all short exact sequences of A-A-bimodules that are split as A-K-bimodules also split as A-A-bimodules. Indeed, this condition is necessary since the multiplication mapping \mu : A \otimes_K A \rightarrow A arising in the definition above is a A-A-bimodule epimorphism, which is split as an A-K-bimodule map by the right inverse mapping A \rightarrow A \otimes_K A given by a \mapsto a \otimes 1 . The converse can be proven by a judicious use of the separability idempotent (similarly to the proof of Maschke's theorem, applying its components within and without the splitting maps).{{sfn|Ford|2017|loc=Theorem 4.4.1|ps=none}}

Equivalently, the relative Hochschild cohomology groups H^n(R,S;M) of {{nowrap|(R, S)}} in any coefficient bimodule M is zero for {{nowrap|n > 0}}. Examples of separable extensions are many including first separable algebras where R is a separable algebra and S = 1 times the ground field. Any ring R with elements a and b satisfying {{nowrap|1=ab = 1}}, but ba different from 1, is a separable extension over the subring S generated by 1 and bRa.

Relation to Frobenius algebras

A separable algebra is said to be strongly separable if there exists a separability idempotent that is symmetric, meaning

: e = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \otimes y_i = \sum_{i=1}^n y_i \otimes x_i

An algebra is strongly separable if and only if its trace form is nondegenerate, thus making the algebra into a particular kind of Frobenius algebra called a symmetric algebra (not to be confused with the symmetric algebra arising as the quotient of the tensor algebra).

If K is commutative, A is a finitely generated projective separable K-module, then A is a symmetric Frobenius algebra.{{sfn|Endo|Watanabe|1967|loc=Theorem 4.2|ps=. If A is commutative, the proof is simpler, see {{harvnb|Kadison|1999|loc=Lemma 5.11}}.}}

Relation to formally unramified and formally étale extensions

Any separable extension {{nowrap|A / K}} of commutative rings is formally unramified. The converse holds if A is a finitely generated K-algebra.{{sfn|Ford|2017|loc=Corollary 4.7.2, Theorem 8.3.6|ps=none}} A separable flat (commutative) K-algebra A is formally étale.{{sfn|Ford|2017|loc=Corollary 4.7.3|ps=none}}

Further results

A theorem in the area is that of J. Cuadra that a separable Hopf–Galois extension {{nowrap|R {{!}} S}} has finitely generated natural {{nowrap|S-module}} R. A fundamental fact about a separable extension {{nowrap|R {{!}} S}} is that it is left or right semisimple extension: a short exact sequence of left or right {{nowrap|R-modules}} that is split as {{nowrap|S-modules}}, is split as {{nowrap|R-modules}}. In terms of G. Hochschild's relative homological algebra, one says that all {{nowrap|R-modules}} are relative {{nowrap|(R, S)}}-projective. Usually relative properties of subrings or ring extensions, such as the notion of separable extension, serve to promote theorems that say that the over-ring shares a property of the subring. For example, a separable extension R of a semisimple algebra S has R semisimple, which follows from the preceding discussion.

There is the celebrated Jans theorem that a finite group algebra A over a field of characteristic p is of finite representation type if and only if its Sylow p-subgroup is cyclic: the clearest proof is to note this fact for p-groups, then note that the group algebra is a separable extension of its Sylow p-subgroup algebra B as the index is coprime to the characteristic. The separability condition above will imply every finitely generated {{nowrap|A-module}} M is isomorphic to a direct summand in its restricted, induced module. But if B has finite representation type, the restricted module is uniquely a direct sum of multiples of finitely many indecomposables, which induce to a finite number of constituent indecomposable modules of which M is a direct sum. Hence A is of finite representation type if B is. The converse is proven by a similar argument noting that every subgroup algebra B is a {{nowrap|B-bimodule}} direct summand of a group algebra A.

Citations

{{reflist}}

References

  • {{cite book

|last1=DeMeyer |first1=F.

|last2=Ingraham |first2=E.

|title=Separable algebras over commutative rings

|series=Lecture Notes in Mathematics

| volume=181

| publisher=Springer-Verlag |location=Berlin-Heidelberg-New York

| year=1971

| isbn=978-3-540-05371-2

| zbl=0215.36602

}}

  • Samuel Eilenberg and Tadasi Nakayama, [https://web.archive.org/web/20110120012931/http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?service=UI&version=1.0&verb=Display&handle=euclid.nmj%2F1118799677 On the dimension of modules and algebras. II. Frobenius algebras and quasi-Frobenius rings], Nagoya Math. J. Volume 9 (1955), 1–16.
  • {{citation

|last1=Endo |first1=Shizuo

|last2=Watanabe |first2=Yutaka

|title=On separable algebras over a commutative ring

|journal=Osaka Journal of Mathematics

|volume=4

|year=1967

|pages=233–242

|mr=0227211

|url=http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ojm/1200691953

}}

  • {{citation

|last1=Ford |first1=Timothy J.

|title=Separable algebras

|publisher=American Mathematical Society|location=Providence, RI

|year=2017

|isbn=978-1-4704-3770-1

|mr=3618889

}}

  • {{citation

|last1=Hirata |first1=H.

|last2=Sugano |first2=K.

|title=On semisimple and separable extensions of noncommutative rings

|journal=J. Math. Soc. Jpn.

|volume=18

|year=1966

|pages=360–373

}}

  • {{citation

|last1=Kadison |first1=Lars |author-link=Lars Kadison

|title=New examples of Frobenius extensions

|series=University Lecture Series

|volume=14

|publisher=American Mathematical Society |location=Providence, RI

|year=1999

|isbn=0-8218-1962-3

|mr=1690111

|doi=10.1090/ulect/014

}}

  • {{citation

|last1=Reiner |first1=I. |authorlink=Irving Reiner

|title=Maximal Orders

|series=London Mathematical Society Monographs. New Series

|volume=28

|publisher=Oxford University Press

|year=2003

|isbn=0-19-852673-3

|zbl=1024.16008

}}

  • {{Weibel IHA}}

Category:Algebras