Situation semantics

Situations, unlike worlds, are not complete in the sense that every proposition or its negation holds in a world. According to Situations and Attitudes, meaning is a relation between a discourse situation, a connective situation and a described situation. The original theory of Situations and Attitudes soon ran into foundational difficulties. A reformulation based on Peter Aczel's non-well-founded set theoryBarwise, Jon. 1989. [https://books.google.com/books?id=aX7RKgvpJw8C&q=%22situation+semantics%22 The Situation in Logic]. CSLI Lecture Notes 17. Center for the Study of Language (CSLI). was proposed by Barwise before this approach to the subject petered out in the early 1990s.

Situation semantics is the first semantic theory that was used in head-driven phrase structure grammar (HPSG).Pollard, Carl and Ivan A. Sag, 1987. Information-Based Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 1: Fundamentals. CSLI Lecture Notes 13. CSLI, Stanford, CA.

Barwise and Perry's system was a top-down approach which foundered on practical issues which were early identified by Angelika Kratzer and others. She subsequently developed a considerable body of theory bottom-up by addressing a variety of issues in the areas of context dependency in discourse and the syntax–semantics interface.[http://people.umass.edu/kratzer/ Umass Faculty Member Site with links to corpus] Because of its practical nature and ongoing development this body of work "with possible situations as parts of possible worlds, now has much more influence than Barwise and Perry’s ideas".Barbara Partee, "Reflections of Formal Semanticist as of Feb. 2005", p. 20. February 14, 2005.

• {{annotated link|Circumscription (logic)}}
• {{annotated link|Montague grammar}}
• {{annotated link|Semantics}}

{{reflist}}

• [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/situations-semantics/ "Situations in Natural Language Semantics"] – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

{{formal semantics}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Situation Semantics}}

Category:Semantics

{{semantics-stub}}