Solar Energy Generating Systems
{{Short description|Concentrated solar thermal power station in the Mojave Desert of California}}
{{redirect|SEGS|the airport with that ICAO code|Seymour Airport}}
{{Infobox power station
| name = Solar Energy Generating Systems
| image = Solar Plant kl.jpg
| image_caption = Part of the 354 MW SEGS solar complex in northern San Bernardino County, California.
| image_alt =
| coordinates = {{coord|35.0316|-117.348|region:US-CA_type:landmark|display=inline,title}}
| country = United States
| location = Mojave Desert
| status = O
| construction_began = 1983
| commissioned = 1984
| decommissioned =
| cost =
| owner = NextEra Energy Resources
| operator =
| solar_type = CSP
| solar_csp_technology = P
| solar_concentration =
| solar_collectors = 936,384
| solar_collectors_area =
| ps_site_area = {{convert|1600|acre|ha|1}}
| solar_site_resource = 2,725 kWh/m2/yr
| ps_units_operational = 2
| ps_units_cancelled =
| ps_units_decommissioned = 7
| ps_units_manu_model =
| ps_electrical_capacity = 160
| ps_electrical_cap_fac = 19.2%
| ps_annual_generation = 539 GW·h (2015)
| website =
| extra =
}}
{{GeoGroup}}
Solar Energy Generating Systems (SEGS) is a concentrated solar power plant in California, United States. With the combined capacity from three separate locations at 354 megawatt (MW), it was for thirty years the world's largest solar thermal energy generating facility, until the commissioning of the even larger Ivanpah facility in 2014. It was also for thirty years the world's largest solar generating facility of any type of technology, until the commissioning of the photovoltaic Topaz Solar Farm in 2014. It consisted of nine solar power plants in California's Mojave Desert, where insolation is among the best available in the United States.
SEGS I–II (44 MW) were located at Daggett ({{coord|34|51|45|N|116|49|45|W}}); they have been replaced with a solar photovoltaic farm.
SEGS III–VII (150 MW) were installed at Kramer Junction ({{coord|35|00|43|N|117|33|32|W}}); all five SEGS have undergone demolition.{{Cite web |last= |first= |date= |title=SEGS III – VII - Kramer Junction |url=https://www.energy.ca.gov/powerplant/solar-thermal/segs-iii-vii-kramer-junction |access-date=24 September 2022 |website=California Energy Commission |language=en}}
SEGS VIII–IX (160 MW) are located at Harper Lake ({{coord|35|01|55|N|117|20|50|W}}).[http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2005/09/about_parabolic.html The Energy Blog: About Parabolic Trough Solar] NextEra Energy Resources operates and partially owns the plants located at Kramer Junction. On January 26, 2018, the SEGS VIII and IX at Harper Lake were sold to renewable energy company Terra-Gen, LLC.
A tenth plant (SEGS X, 80 MW) had been in construction and SEGS XI and SEGS XII had been planned by Luz Industries, but the developer filed for bankruptcy in 1992, because it was unable to secure construction financing.{{cite web|url=http://www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/solar/ |title=Large Solar Energy Projects |publisher = California Energy Commission | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160714141020/http://www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/solar/ | archive-date = 14 July 2016 | url-status = dead|access-date=14 July 2016}} The site of SEGS X was later licensed for a solar photovoltaic farm, Lockhart Solar PV II.{{cite web |url=http://www.sbcounty.gov/uploads/LUS/Desert/2021-07-14_Lockhart%20Solar%20PV%20II_NOP.pdf |title="2021-07-14 Lockhart Solar PV II NOP"}}
Most of the thermal facilities were retired by 2021,{{cite web |last1=Cheah |first1=Cindy |title=World's longest-operating solar thermal facility is retiring most of its capacity - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) |url=https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=49616 |website=www.eia.gov |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210926035412/https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=49616 |archive-date=26 September 2021 |date=21 September 2021 |url-status=live}} and photovoltaics were built on the same sites.
Plants' scale and operations
Before retirement and replacement of SEGS I-VII with solar photovoltaics, the plants had a 354 MW net (394 MW gross) installed capacity. The nameplate capacity, which operating continuously, would dеliver the samе net power output, coming only from the solar source was around {{nowrap|75 MWe —}}, representing a 21% capacity factor. In addition, the turbines could be utilized at night by burning natural gas.
NextEra claimed in 2009 that the solar plants could power 232,500 homеs (during the day, at peak power) and displace 3,800 tons of pollution pеr year that would have been produced if the electricity had been providеd by fossil fuels, such as oil.{{cite web
|url=http://www.nexteraenergyresources.com/content/where/portfolio/pdf/segs.pdf
|title=Solar Electric Generating System
|access-date=2009-12-13
}}
The facilities had a total of 936,384 mirrors and cover more than {{convert|1600|acre|ha|1}}. Lined up, the parabolic mirrors would have extended over {{convert|229|mi|km|0}}.
As an example of cost, in 2002, one of the 30 MW Kramer Junction sites required $90 million to construct, and its operation and maintenance cost was about $3 million per year (4.6 cents per kilowatt hour)."Reducing the Cost of Energy from Parabolic Trough Solar Power Plants", NREL, 2003
Principle of operation
The installation uses parabolic trough, solar thermal technology along with natural gas to generate electricity. About 90% of the electricity is produced by the sunlight.{{citation needed|date=June 2013}} Natural gas is only used when the solar power is insufficient to meet the demand from Southern California Edison, the distributor of power in southern California.{{Cite web|url=http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-fi-electricity-solar/|title=California invested heavily in solar power. Now there's so much that other states are sometimes paid to take it|last=Penn|first=Ivan|website=www.latimes.com|date=22 June 2017 |language=en|access-date=2019-02-25}}
=Mirrors=
The parabolic mirrors are shaped like quarter-pipes. The sun shines on glass panels, which are 94% reflective, unlike a typical mirror, which is only 70% reflective. The mirrors automatically track the sun throughout the day. The greatest source of mirror breakage is wind, with 3,000 mirrors typically replaced each year. Operators can turn the mirrors to protect them during intense wind storms. An automated washing mechanism is used to periodically clean the parabolic reflective panels. The term "field area" is assessed as the actual collector area.
=Heat transfer=
The sunlight bounces off the mirrors and is directed to a central tube filled with synthetic oil, which heats to over {{convert|400|C|F|sigfig=2}}. The reflected light focused at the central tube is 71 to 80 times more intense than the ordinary sunlight. The synthetic oil transfers its heat to water, which boils and drives the Rankine cycle steam turbine,{{cite web
|url=http://www.solel.com/products/pgeneration/ls2/
|title=Solar thermal power generation
| publisher = Solel Solar Systems Ltd
|access-date=2010-09-30
|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080601185224/http://www.solel.com/products/pgeneration/ls2/
|archive-date= 2008-06-01
}} thereby generating electricity. Synthetic oil is used to carry the heat (instead of water) to keep the pressure within manageable parameters.
Individual locations
The SEGS power plants were built by Luz Industries,{{cite web
|title=Crimes Against the Future: The Demise of Luz
|url=http://www.greentechhistory.com/2009/11/the-bankruptcy-of-luz/|work=Inventing Green
|access-date=30 September 2010
|author=Alexis Madrigal
|date=November 16, 2009
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110711125533/http://www.greentechhistory.com/2009/11/the-bankruptcy-of-luz/
|archive-date=2011-07-11|author-link=Alexis Madrigal}} and commissioned between December 20, 1984 and October 1, 1990.[http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/solar_generation.html Solar Electricity Generation in California] After Luz Industries' bankruptcy in 1991 plants were sold to various investor groups as individual projects, and expansion including three more plants was halted.
Kramer Junction employs about 95 people and 45 people work at Harper Lake.{{Citation needed|date=February 2019}}
class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
|+ SEGS plant history and operational data (1991–2002) | |||||||||||||
bgcolor="#ececec"
! colspan="15" | Gross solar production | |||||||||||||
bgcolor="#ececec"
! | Plant ! | 1991 ! | 1992 ! | 1993 ! | 1994 ! | 1995 ! | 1996 ! | 1997 ! | 1998 ! | 1999 ! | 2000 ! | 2001 ! | 2002 ! | average 1998–2002 ! | Total | |||||||||||||
align="left" | SEGS I | 20,252 | 17,938 | 20,368 | 20,194 | 19,800 | 19,879 | 19,228 | 18,686 | 11,250 | 17,235 | 17,947 | 17,402 | 16,500
! 348,950 |
align="left" | SEGS II | 35,168 | 32,481 | 36,882 | 36,566 | 35,853 | 35,995 | 34,817 | 33,836 | 33,408 | 31,207 | 32,497 | 31,511 | 32,500
! 571,696 |
align="left" | SEGS III | 60,134 | 48,702 | 58,248 | 56,892 | 56,663 | 64,170 | 64,677 | 70,598 | 70,689 | 65,994 | 69,369 | 66,125 | 68,555
! 995,686 |
align="left" | SEGS IV | 64,600 | 51,007 | 58,935 | 57,795 | 54,929 | 61,970 | 64,503 | 71,635 | 71,142 | 63,457 | 64,842 | 70,313 | 68,278
! 1,017,283 |
align="left" | SEGS V | 59,009 | 55,383 | 67,685 | 66,255 | 63,757 | 71,439 | 75,936 | 75,229 | 70,293 | 73,810 | 71,826 | 73,235 | 72,879
! 1,014,444 |
align="left" | SEGS VI | 64,155 | 47,087 | 55,724 | 56,908 | 63,650 | 71,409 | 70,019 | 67,358 | 71,066 | 68,543 | 67,339 | 64,483 | 67,758
! 878,476 |
align="left" | SEGS VII | 58,373 | 46,940 | 54,110 | 53,251 | 61,220 | 70,138 | 69,186 | 67,651 | 66,258 | 64,195 | 64,210 | 62,196 | 65,048
! 834,986 |
align="left" | SEGS VIII | 102,464 | 109,361 | 130,999 | 134,578 | 133,843 | 139,174 | 136,410 | 137,905 | 135,233 | 140,079 | 137,754 | 138,977 | 137,990
! 1,691,773 |
align="left" | SEGS IX | 144,805 | 129,558 | 130,847 | 137,915 | 138,959 | 141,916 | 139,697 | 119,732 | 107,513 | 128,315 | 132,051 | 137,570 | 125,036
! 1,594,852 |
bgcolor="#ececec"
| align="left" |Total | 608,960 | 538,458 | 613,798 | 620,358 | 628,674 | 676,091 | 674,473 | 662,631 | 636,851 | 652,835 | 657,834 | 662,542 | 654,539
! 8,967,123 |
colspan="15" align="left" |Sources: Solargenix Energy, KJC Operating Company, IEEE, NREL |
class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: center;"
|+ SEGS plant history and operational data (2003–2014) | |||||||||||||
bgcolor="#ececec"
! colspan="15" | Net solar production | |||||||||||||
bgcolor="#ececec"
! | Plant ! | 2003 ! | 2004 ! | 2005 ! | 2006 ! | 2007 ! | 2008 ! | 2009 ! | 2010 ! | 2011 ! | 2012 ! | 2013 ! | 2014 ! | average 2003–2014 ! | Total | |||||||||||||
align="left" | SEGS I | 6,913 | 8,421 | 6,336 | 5,559 | 0 | 10,705 | 9,033 | 10,648 | 11,164 | 11,666 | 9,403 | 8,583 | 8,203
! 98,431 |
align="left" | SEGS II | 11,142 | 14,582 | 13,375 | 7,547 | 5,445 | 28,040 | 18,635 | 22,829 | 26,198 | 25,126 | 23,173 | 7,611 | 16,975
! 203,703 |
align="left" | SEGS III | 59,027 | 64,413 | 56,680 | 51,721 | 59,480 | 69,012 | 62,971 | 60,029 | 61,350 | 56,877 | 56,824 | 54,407 | 59,399
! 712,791 |
align="left" | SEGS IV | 58,100 | 62,006 | 56,349 | 52,439 | 59,799 | 69,338 | 63,563 | 63,084 | 57,684 | 62,414 | 58,317 | 54,321 | 59,785
! 717,414 |
align="left" | SEGS V | 61,921 | 67,717 | 62,309 | 53,471 | 59,547 | 69,316 | 59,820 | 54,328 | 60,451 | 62,877 | 57,758 | 56,354 | 60,489
! 725,869 |
align="left" | SEGS VI | 50,504 | 53,618 | 51,827 | 45,076 | 65,832 | 67,156 | 62,750 | 63,576 | 59,327 | 56,082 | 52,539 | 50,547 | 56,570
! 678,834 |
align="left" | SEGS VII | 49,154 | 50,479 | 46,628 | 42,050 | 58,307 | 65,185 | 58,950 | 58,836 | 57,378 | 54,147 | 48,183 | 46,762 | 53,005
! 636,059 |
align="left" | SEGS VIII | 119,357 | 124,089 | 120,282 | 117,451 | 122,676 | 135,492 | 131,474 | 155,933 | 152,463 | 145,247 | 141,356 | 145,525 | 134,279
! 1,611,345 |
align="left" | SEGS IX | 115,541 | 123,605 | 120,915 | 117,310 | 122,699 | 150,362 | 139,756 | 163,899 | 160,506 | 164,203 | 154,082 | 147,883 | 140,063
! 1,680,761 |
bgcolor="#ececec"
|Total | 531,659 | 568,930 | 534,701 | 492,624 | 553,785 | 664,606 | 606,952 | 653,162 | 646,521 | 638,639 | 601,635 | 571,993 | 588,767
! 7,065,207 |
class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: center;"
|+ SEGS plant history and operational data (2015–2021) | |||||
bgcolor="#ececec"
! colspan="9" | Net solar production | |||||
bgcolor="#ececec"
! | Plant ! | 2015 ! | 2016 ! | 2017 ! | 2018 !2019 !2020 !2021 ! | Total ! | Total | |||||
align="left" | SEGS I[http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/10437 EIA Electricity Data Browser - SEGS I] | 12,562 | dec. | (PV) | (PV)
|(PV) |(PV) |(PV) | 12,562
! 459,943 |
align="left" | SEGS II[http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/10438 EIA Electricity Data Browser - SEGS II] | dec. | dec. | (PV) | (PV)
|(PV) |(PV) |(PV) | 0
! 775,399 |
align="left" | SEGS III[http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/10439 EIA Electricity Data Browser - SEGS III] | 52,073 | 46,582 | 44,115 | 43,849
|38,242 |0 |dec. | 224,861
! 1,933,518 |
align="left" | SEGS IV[http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/10440 EIA Electricity Data Browser - SEGS IV] | 53,117 | 49,034 | 43,182 | 44,406
|41,865 |0 |dec. | 231,604
! 1,969,301 |
align="left" | SEGS V[http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/10441 EIA Electricity Data Browser - SEGS V] | 52,646 | 50,142 | 43,934 | 47,383
|41,424 |0 |dec. | 235,529
! 1,975,842 |
align="left" | SEGS VI[http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/10442 EIA Electricity Data Browser - SEGS VI] | 46,937 | 40,923 | 36,380 | 34,262
|0 |0 |dec. | 158,502
! 1,715,812 |
align="left" | SEGS VII[http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/10443 EIA Electricity Data Browser - SEGS VII] | 37,771 | 30,480 | 32,601 | 27,956
|0 |0 |dec. | 128,808
! 1,599,852 |
align="left" | SEGS VIII[http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/10444 EIA Electricity Data Browser - SEGS VIII] | 138,149 | 140,849 | 123,451 | 132,871
|120,530 |114,557 |81,699 | 852,106
! 4,189,538 |
align="left" | SEGS IX[http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/10446 EIA Electricity Data Browser - SEGS IX] | 145,863 | 142,867 | 131,268 | 137,564
|124,375 |122,045 |116,013 | 919,995
! 4,161,294 |
bgcolor="#ececec"
|Total | 539,118 | 500,877 | 454,931 | 468,291
|366,254 |236,602 |197,712 | 2,754,405
! 18,780,499 |
colspan="9" align="left" | Starting 2017, SEGS I was replaced by PV system Sunray 2, and SEGS II by PV system Sunray 3 |
= Harper Lake =
Until Ivanpah Solar Power Facility was commissioned in 2014, SEGS VIII and SEGS IX, located at {{Coord|35.031815|-117.347270 |format=dms |region:US-CA_type:landmark |name=SEGS VIII and IX}} were the largest solar thermal power plants individually and collectively in the world.Jones, J. (2000), "[http://www.osti.gov/accomplishments/documents/fullText/ACC0196.pdf Solar Trough Power Plants]", National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Retrieved 2010-01-04. They were the last, the largest, and the most advanced of the nine plants at SEGS, designed to take advantage of the economies of scale. Construction of the tenth plant in the same locality was halted because of the bankruptcy of Luz Industries. Construction of the approved eleventh and twelfth plants never started. Each of the three planned plants would have had 80 MW of installed capacity.{{Cite web |url=http://www.energy.ca.gov/siting/solar/index.html |title=California Energy Commission - Large Solar Energy Projects |access-date=2011-05-02 |archive-date=2008-05-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080511185253/http://www.energy.ca.gov/siting/solar/index.html |url-status=dead }} Abengoa Solar recently constructed the 280MW Mojave Solar Project (MSP) adjacent to the SEGS VIII and SEGS IX plants.[http://www.abengoasolar.com/web/en/plantas_solares/plantas_para_terceros/estados_unidos/index.html Abengoa Solar - The Mojave Solar Project] The MSP also uses concentrating solar thermal trough technology.
Starting in February 2020, SEGS VIII no longer burned natural gas. The last production month was October 2021. SEGS IX stopped burning natural gas starting October 2020, except for January 2021.
=Kramer Junction=
File:Solar Energy Generating Systems at Kramer Junction.jpg
This location ({{Coord|35.013218|-117.560531 |format=dms |region:US-CA_type:landmark |name=SEGS III–VII}}) receives an average of 340 days of sunshine per year, which makes it an ideal place for solar power generation. The average direct normal radiation (DNR) is 7.44 kWh/m2/day (310 W/m2),
{{Cite journal
|first = Scott
|last = Frier
|editor = An overview of the Kramer Junction SEGS recent performance
|title = Parabolic Trough Workshop
|year = 1999
|place = Ontario, California
|publisher = KJC Operating Company
|url = http://www.nrel.gov/csp/troughnet/pdfs/1999_kjc.pdf
|url-status = dead
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081015003905/http://www.nrel.gov/csp/troughnet/pdfs/1999_kjc.pdf
|archive-date = 2008-10-15
}}
one of the best in the nation{{citation needed|date=June 2013}}. This was the location of SEGS II - VII, which were retired in 2019. As of 2021, they were going to be replaced with a new solar photovoltaic array called Resurgence I.{{cite news |url=https://cal-cca.org/valley-clean-energy-makes-major-solarstorage-power-deal/ |title=Valley Clean Energy Makes Major Solar, Storage Power Deal}}{{cite web |url=http://www.sbcounty.gov/uploads/lus/pc/PROJ-2021-00019_Staff_Report_FINAL.pdf |title=Resurgence Solar I & II Land Use Services Department Planning Commission Staff Report }}
=Daggett=
SEGS I and II were located at {{Coord|34.8631|-116.827 |format=dms |region:US-CA_type:landmark |name=SEGS I and II}} and owned by Cogentrix Energy (Carlyle Group).[http://www.cogentrix.com/plants.aspx?id=15 SUNRAY/SEGS] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130516135750/http://www.cogentrix.com/plants.aspx?id=15 |date=2013-05-16 }} SEGS II was shut down in 2014 and was replaced by Sunray 3 (EIA plant code 10438), a 13,8 MW photovoltaic system. SEGS I was shut down one year later and replaced by 20 MW PV system Sunray 2 (EIA plant code 10437).[https://www.energy.ca.gov/almanac/renewables_data/solar/ California Solar Energy Statistics & Data][http://www.desertdispatch.com/article/20150425/NEWS/150429961 Permit approved for solar facility] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170213030857/http://www.desertdispatch.com/article/20150425/NEWS/150429961 |date=2017-02-13 }} Sunray 2 and Sunray 3 started production in 2017 as per EIA data.
Accidents and incidents
In February 1999, a {{convert|900000|USgal|m3|adj=on}} mineral oil storage tank exploded at the SEGS I (Daggett) solar power plant, sending flames and smoke into the sky. Authorities were trying to keep flames away from two adjacent containers that held sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide. The immediate area of {{convert|0.5|sqmi|km2}} was evacuated.[https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1999-feb-27-mn-12205-story.html Storage Tank at Solar Power Plant in Desert Explodes; Immediate Area Is Evacuated]
See also
{{stack|{{Portal|California|Renewable energy}}}}
{{Div col|colwidth=33em}}
- List of concentrating solar thermal power companies
- List of photovoltaic power stations
- List of solar thermal power stations
- Renewable energy in the United States
- Renewable portfolio standard
- Solar power
- Solar power plants in the Mojave Desert
- List of largest power stations in the world
- Solana Generating Station
{{Div col end}}
References
{{Reflist|33em}}
{{Generating stations in California|state=autocollapse}}
{{Solar power in the United States}}
Category:Energy infrastructure completed in 1984
Category:Energy infrastructure completed in 1985
Category:Energy infrastructure completed in 1986
Category:Energy infrastructure completed in 1987
Category:Energy infrastructure completed in 1988
Category:Energy infrastructure completed in 1989
Category:Energy infrastructure completed in 1990
Category:Solar power in the Mojave Desert
Category:Solar power stations in California
Category:Buildings and structures in San Bernardino County, California