SpaceX Kestrel
{{short description|Family of rocket engines developed by SpaceX for use on its Falcon 1 launch vehicles}}
{{Infobox rocket engine
|image = SpaceX Kestrel engine2.gif
|image_size = 140
|caption = SpaceX Kestrel
|name = SpaceX Kestrel
|country_of_origin= United States
|manufacturer = SpaceX
|purpose = Upper stage boost
|first_date = 2006
|last_date = 2009
|designer = Tom Mueller
|type = liquid
|fuel = RP-1
|oxidiser = LOX
|cycle = Pressure fed
|thrust(Vac) = {{cvt| 28|kN| t-f}}
|specific_impulse_vacuum = {{convert| 317| isp}}
|chamber_pressure = {{cvt| 9.3| bar| psi}}
|thrust_to_weight = 65
|length=
|diameter=
|dry_weight= {{cvt| 52| kg| lb}}
|references={{cite news|url=http://www.spacex.com/Falcon1UsersGuide.pdf |title=Falcon 1 Users Guide |date=2008-09-28 |publisher=SpaceX |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081001161902/http://www.spacex.com/Falcon1UsersGuide.pdf |archive-date=October 1, 2008 }}{{Cite web |date=2015-01-19 |title=SpaceX Falcon Data Sheet |url=http://www.spacelaunchreport.com/falcon.html |access-date=2024-12-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150119203838/http://www.spacelaunchreport.com/falcon.html |archive-date=19 January 2015 }}[http://www.astronautix.com/engines/kestrel.htm astronautix] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131216104115/http://www.astronautix.com/engines/kestrel.htm |date=2013-12-16 }}
}}
Image:SpaceX engine test fire.jpg
The SpaceX Kestrel was an LOX/RP-1 pressure-fed rocket engine. The Kestrel engine was developed in the 2000s by SpaceX for upper stage use on the Falcon 1 rocket. Kestrel is no longer being manufactured; the last flight of Falcon 1 was in 2009.
Kestrel was built around the same pintle architecture as the SpaceX Merlin engine but does not have a turbopump and is fed only by tank pressure.
Kestrel was ablatively cooled in the chamber and throat and radiatively cooled in the nozzle, which was fabricated from a high strength niobium alloy. As a metal, niobium is highly resistant to cracking compared to carbon-carbon. According to SpaceX, an impact from orbital debris or during stage separation might dent the metal but have no meaningful effect on engine performance.{{cite news |url=http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/SpaceX_Confirms_Stage_Bump_On_Demoflight_2_999.html | title=SpaceX Confirms Stage Bump On Demoflight 2 | author = Greg Zsidisin | date = 23 March 2007 | publisher = Space Daily |access-date=2008-09-30}} Helium pressurant efficiency is substantially increased via a titanium heat exchanger on the ablative/niobium boundary.{{cite web|url=http://www.spacex.com/SpaceX_F1-003_PressKit.pdf |publisher=SpaceX |title=Falcon 1 Flight Three Press Kit |access-date=2008-09-30 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081001161901/http://www.spacex.com/SpaceX_F1-003_PressKit.pdf |archive-date=2008-10-01 }}
Thrust vector control is provided by electro-mechanical actuators on the engine dome for pitch and yaw. Roll control (and attitude control during coast phases) is provided by helium cold gas thrusters.
A TEA-TEB pyrophoric ignition system is used to provide restart capability on the upper stage and simplify design.{{Cite web |date= |title=Space Exploration Technologies Corporation - Updates Archive |url=http://spacex.com/updates_archive.php?page=0205-0505 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071105080852/http://spacex.com/updates_archive.php?page=0205-0505 |archive-date=2007-11-05 |access-date=2024-09-13 |website=SpaceX}} In a multi-manifested mission, this design would allow for drop off at different altitudes and inclinations.
Kestrel 2
Enhancements to the design of the original Kestrel engine were planned, called the Kestrel 2.
{{cite journal |last=Bjelde|first=Brian |author2=Max Vozoff |author3=Gwynne Shotwell |title=The Falcon 1 Launch Vehicle: Demonstration Flights, Status, Manifest, and Upgrade Path |journal=21st Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites |date=August 2007 |issue=SSC07 - III - 6 |url=http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1456&context=smallsat |access-date=2013-12-06 }}
The engine design was still pressure-fed, and was supposed to fly on a newly designed second stage that used Aluminium-lithium alloy 2195, rather than the 2014 Aluminum used in the Falcon 1 second stage.
Engine changes were to include tighter tolerances to improve consistency, higher Isp, and lighter weight.{{cite web
|last=Bergin
|first=Chris
|author2=Braddock Gaskill
|title=Elon Musk Q and A - Updates SpaceX status on Falcon and Dragon
|publisher=NASAspaceflight.com
|date=2007-09-24
|url=http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5237
|access-date=2008-06-16
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080529015150/http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5237
|archive-date=2008-05-29
|url-status=dead
}}
The Kestrel 2 did not remain in active development after the Falcon 1 was replaced by the much larger Falcon 9 v1.0 which used an improved Merlin 1C for its upper stage.
See also
References
{{Reflist}}
External links
{{Commons category|Kestrel (rocket engine)}}
- [https://web.archive.org/web/20110103230037/http://www.spacex.com/falcon1.php SpaceX Falcon engines page]
{{Rocket engines}}
{{SpaceX}}
__NOTOC__
Category:SpaceX rocket engines
Category:Rocket engines using kerosene propellant