Summa Grammatica

{{Short description|Book by Roger Bacon}}

{{hatnote|Not to be confused with the {{circa|lk=no|1280}} Summa Grammatica of John of Dacia}}

{{italic title}}

The {{lang|la|Summa Grammatica}}{{refn|group=n|In modern references, this standard spelling is typically used, but it is actually written as {{nowrap|{{lang|la|Summa Gramatica}}}} in the surviving texts.{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|p=v}}}} (Latin for "Overview of Grammar"; {{circa|lk=no|AD 1240}}{{harvp|Murphy|1974|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8B5z0MiRnJ8C&pg=PA153 153]}}. or {{circa|lk=no|1250}}){{harvp|Hovdhaugen|1990|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8UxAAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA121 121]}}. was one of the earlier works on Latin grammar and Aristotelian logic by the medieval English philosopher Roger Bacon.{{sfnp|SEP|2013|loc=§2}} It is primarily noteworthy for its exposition of a kind of universal grammar.

__NOTOC__

{{anchor|Origin|Manuscrips|MSS}}

History

The work is apparently a series of lectures given by Bacon for the mandatory classes on Priscian's work On Construction (Books XVII & XVIII of his Institutes of Grammar) at the University of Paris, where he taught in the 1230s and '40s. Much more than Bacon's later linguistic works, the {{lang|la|Summa Grammatica}} lies in the mainstream of 13th-century analysis. The first part borrows directly from Robert Kilwardby's commentary on Priscian.Kilwardby, {{lang|la|Inst. Gram.}}, Ch. xvii.{{sfnp|Rosier-Catach|1994}} More generally, the work reflects the speculative grammar taught at Oxford in such 13th-century works as the {{lang|la|Logica cum Sit Nostra}}. It is probable that the final draft of the work which Bacon mentions in his {{lang|la|Communia Naturalium}}Bacon, Com. Nat., [https://archive.org/stream/operahactenusine02baco#page/n11/mode/2up Bk. I, p. 1.] was never completed.{{harvp|Steele|1940|p=[https://archive.org/stream/operahactenusine15baco#page/n17/mode/2up xii]}}. His Greek and Hebrew Grammars and Compendium of Philosophy may have been considered as part of it.

It survived in two manuscripts: P and W. P is a copy in book hand evidently intended for a personal library.Cambridge Peterhouse 191. W is a students' copy written in the informal hand of the late 13th or early 14th century.{{harvp|Steele|1940|p=[https://archive.org/stream/operahactenusine15baco#page/n15/mode/2up x]}}.Worcester Cathedral, MS Q13.

Contents

The work describes figurative language, rhetorical devices, and irregular Latin grammar{{sfnp|Steele|1940|pp=[https://archive.org/stream/operahactenusine15baco#page/n15/mode/2up x–xi]}} using "sophisms" or illustrative examples.{{harvp|Rosier-Catach|1997|p=68}} It aims to complement Bacon's students' required readings of Priscian's work On Construction by presenting its important points in a more thorough and logical order. It assumes a mastery of standard grammatical rules which the students would have already learnt as {{lang|la|glomerelli}}.{{harvp|Steele|1940|p=[https://archive.org/stream/operahactenusine15baco#page/n15/mode/2up xi]}}. It most frequently cites Priscian, but more often adopts the solutions of Peter Helias.

The first section lays out rules regarding grammatical agreement and the rhetorical devices antithesis,{{sfn|SG|loc="{{lang|la|De Antithesi}}"}}{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=27 ff}} synthesis,{{sfn|SG|loc="{{lang|la|De Sinthesi vel Apposicione}}"}}{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=43 ff}} procatalepsis,{{sfn|SG|loc="{{lang|la|De Prolemptica Construccione}}"}}{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=71 ff}}{{harvp|SEP|2013|loc=§3.1}}. From the Aristotelian notion that "art imitates nature to the extent that it can"Aristotle, Phys., Bk. II, 219, 4a21.{{sfn|SG|loc=§35.4}} and under the influence of Averroës's commentaries, Bacon argues that nouns and pronouns can be distinguished from verbs and adverbs owing to the distinction between permanent and successive things. Further, verbs constitute a kind of movement from the subject{{refn|group=n|Referenced in the work by the terms of art "first item" ({{lang|la|principium}}) or "end from which" ({{lang|la|terminus a quo}}).}} to the object{{sfn|SG|loc=§34}}{{refn|group=n|Referenced in the work by the terms of art "end" ({{lang|la|terminus}}) or "end to which" ({{lang|la|terminus ad quem}}).}} which imposes obligations on the grammar. For instance, owing to their origin from verbs, Bacon considers that participles and infinitives are too unstable to function properly as the object of a sentence, as "nothing which is in motion can come to rest in something in motion, no motion being able to complete itself in something in motion".

The second section deals with non-figurative constructions including impersonals,{{sfn|SG|loc="{{lang|la|De Construccionibus Impersonibus}}"}}{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=74 ff}} gerundives,{{sfn|SG|loc="{{lang|la|De Gerundio}}"}}{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=86 ff}} interjections,{{sfn|SG|loc="{{lang|la|De Interjeccione}}"}}{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=95 ff}} and ablative absolutes.{{sfn|SG|loc="{{lang|la|De Ablativo Absoluto}}"}}{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=121 ff}}

The third section{{sfn|SG|loc=§119 ff}} covers illustrative examples by topic in greater or less detail and more or less at random.{{harvp|Rosier-Catach|1997|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Gy3Vp7TurVUC&pg=PA69 69]}}. The primary ones are {{lang|la|Moris erat Persis ducibus tunc temporis omnem ducere in arma domum}},{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=129 ff}} {{lang|la|Vestes quas geritis sordida lana fuit}},{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=135 ff}} {{lang|la|Amatus sum vel fui}},{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=145 ff}} {{lang|la|Vado Romam que est pulcra civitas}},{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=150 ff}} {{lang|la|Video centum homines uno minus}},{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=159 ff}} {{lang|la|Lupus est in fabula}},{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|p=161}} {{lang|la|In nostro magistro habet bonum hominem}},{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|p=162}} {{lang|la|Margarita est pulcherrimus lapidum}},{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|p=163}} {{lang|la|Quid nisi secrete leserunt Philide silve}},{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|p=164}} and {{lang|la|Nominativo hic magister}}.{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|p=165}} Most of these examples appear in other collections.

The fourth section analyses short sentences, along with adverbial phrases and liturgical formulas such as {{lang|la|ite missa est}}{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|p=183}} whose use of ellipsis presented certain problems. It's divided into three sections on "On Some Cases in the Nominal Absolute",{{sfn|SG|loc="{{lang|la|De Quibusdam Casibus Absolute Positis}}"}}{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=166 ff}} "On Mediate Apposition",{{sfn|SG|loc="{{lang|la|De Apposicione Mediata}}"}}{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=167 ff}} and "On Some Difficulties in Speech".{{sfn|SG|loc="{{lang|la|De Aliquibus Locucionibus Difficilibus}}"}}{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|pp=180 ff}}

Intentionalism

{{main article|Authorial intent}}

Bacon emphasizes that grammatical rules cannot be applied mechanistically but must be understood as a structure through which to attempt to understand the author's intent ({{lang|la|intentio proferentis}}). The desire to communicate some particular idea may require breaking some of the standard rules.{{sfnp|Rosier-Catach|1997|p=73}} Such exceptions must, however, be linguistically justified. In this he follows Kilwardby. Although Bacon considered an understanding of logic to be important for clarity in philosophical and theological texts, he found his era's Modist analyses needed to be tempered by a contextual understanding of the linguistic ambiguity inevitable in the imposition of signs and from the shifts of meaning and emphasis over time.

Universal grammar

{{main article|Universal grammar}}

Bacon argues for a universal grammar underlying all human languages. As more tersely stated in his later Greek Grammar:

{{quote|Grammar is one and the same in all languages, substantially, though it may vary, accidentally, in each of them.{{refn|Nolan,{{sfnp|Nolan & al.|1902|p=27}} cited in Murphy.{{sfnp|Murphy|1974|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8B5z0MiRnJ8C&pg=PA154 154]}}}}{{refn|group=n|In Latin, {{lang|la|Grammatica una et eadem est secundum substantiam in omnibus linguis, licet accidentaliter varietor}}.}}}}

Hovdhaugen leaves open the possibility, however, that, unlike the Modists who followed Bacon, his own statements on the subject did not refer to a universal grammar but to a universal science to be employed in studying linguistics across languages.{{harvp|Hovdhaugen|1990|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8UxAAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA127 127–128]}}. This derives from an ambiguity in the Latin {{lang|la|grammatica}}, which referred variously to the structure of language, to its description, and to the science underlying such descriptions.

See also

  • Modistae, the philosophical school which developed partially under the influence of this work
  • Book III of the Opus Majus

Notes

{{reflist|group=n}}

References

=Citations=

{{reflist|30em}}

=Bibliography=

  • {{citation |last=Bacon |first=Roger |authorlink=Roger Bacon |editor-last=Nolan |editor-first=Edmond |editor2-last=Hirsch |editor2-first=S.A. |display-editors=1 |title=Grammatica Graeca [Greek Grammar] |location=Cambridge |date=1902 |ref={{harvid|Nolan & al.|1902}} |publisher=Cambridge University Press }}. {{anchor|CITEREFSG}}
  • {{citation |last=Bacon |first=Roger |title=Summa Gramatica necnon Sumule Dialectices |url=https://archive.org/details/operahactenusine15baco |series=Opera Hactenus Inedita Rogeri Baconi, No. XV |date=1940 |location=Oxford |publisher=John Jonson for the Clarendon Press |editor-last=Steele |editor-first=Robert |editor-link=Robert Steele (medievalist) |ref={{harvid|Steele|1940}} }}. {{in lang|la}}

  • {{citation |ref={{harvid|Worthies|1828}} |title=The Worthies of the United Kingdom; or Biographical Accounts of the Lives of the Most Illustrious Men, in Arts, Arms, Literature, and Science, connected with Great Britain |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QjhkAAAAcAAJ |location=London |publisher=D. Sidney for Knight & Lacey |date=1828 |contribution=Roger Bacon |contribution-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QjhkAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA39 |pages=39–48 }}.
  • {{citation |last=Hackett |first=Jeremiah M.G. |display-authors=0 |contribution-url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/roger-bacon/ |contribution=Roger Bacon |title=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |url=http://plato.stanford.edu |date=2013 |publisher=Stanford University |ref={{harvid|SEP|2013}} }}.
  • {{citation |last=Hovdhaugen |first=Eva |contribution=Una et Eadem: Some Observations on Roger Bacon's Greek Grammar |contribution-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8UxAAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA117 |title=De Ortu Grammaticae: Studies in Medieval Grammar and Linguistic Theory in Memory of Jan Pinborg |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8UxAAAAAQBAJ |pages=117–132 |editor-last=Bursill-Hall |editor-first=G.L. |editor2-last=Ebbesen |editor2-first=Sten |editor3-last=Koerner |editor3-first=E.F. Konrad |display-editors=0 |series=Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Ser. III: Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, No. 43 |isbn=90-272-4526-6 |date=1990 |publisher=John Benjamins Publishing |location=Amsterdam }}.
  • {{citation |last=Murphy |first=James J. |title=Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory from St. Augustine to the Renaissance |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8B5z0MiRnJ8C |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley |date=1974 |isbn=0-520-04406-1 }}.
  • {{citation |last=Rosier-Catach |first=Irène |title=La Parole Comme Acte: Sur la Grammaire et la Sémantique au XIIIe Siècle |location=Paris |publisher=J. Vrin |date=1994 }}. {{in lang|fr}}
  • {{citation |last=Rosier-Catach |first=Irène |contribution=Roger Bacon and Grammar |contribution-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Gy3Vp7TurVUC&pg=PA67 |editor-last=Hackett |editor-first=Jeremiah M.G. |display-editors=0 |title=Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays |series=Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, No. 57 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Gy3Vp7TurVUC |location=Leiden |publisher=Brill |date=1997 |isbn=90-04-10015-6 |pages=67–102 }}.

Category:Works by Roger Bacon

Category:Latin grammar books

Category:13th-century books in Latin

Category:1240s books

Category:1250s books

Category:1902 books