Susan Fiske

{{Infobox person

| name = Susan Fiske

| image =

| alt =

| caption =

| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1952|08|19}}

| birth_place =

| death_date =

| death_place =

| education = Radcliffe College (BA)
Harvard University (PhD)

| nationality = American

| other_names =

| known_for = Stereotype content model, ambivalent sexism theory, cognitive miser

| relatives = Donald Fiske (father), Alan Fiske (brother)

| occupation = Professor of psychology at Princeton University, author

}}

Susan Tufts Fiske (born August 19, 1952) is an American psychologist who served as the Eugene Higgins Professor of Psychology and Public Affairs in the Department of Psychology at Princeton University.{{cite web |url= http://psych.princeton.edu/psychology/research/fiske/cv.pdf |title= Susan Tufts Fiske – Curriculum Vitae |work= Princeton University, Department of Psychology |access-date= October 20, 2013 |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141107100727/http://psych.princeton.edu/psychology/research/fiske/cv.pdf |archive-date= November 7, 2014 }} She is a social psychologist known for her work on social cognition, stereotypes, and prejudice.{{cite web|url= http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/01/13/princeton |title= Gone, but Not Forgotten |last= Capriccioso |first= Rob |date= January 13, 2006|work= Inside Higher Ed| access-date= October 11, 2010}} Fiske leads the Intergroup Relations, Social Cognition, and Social Neuroscience Lab at Princeton University. Her theoretical contributions include the development of the stereotype content model, ambivalent sexism theory, power as control theory, and the continuum model of impression formation.

Biography

Fiske comes from a family of psychologists and social activists. Her father, Donald W. Fiske, was an influential psychologist who spent most of his career at the University of Chicago.{{cite web|title=Donald W. Fiske|url=http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/03/030410.fiske.shtml|publisher=University of Chicago|access-date=December 7, 2013}} Her mother, Barbara Page Fiske (1917–2007), was a civic leader in Chicago.{{cite web|title=Barbara Page Fiske|date=22 October 2007 |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/2007/10/22/barbara-page-fiske-1917-2007/|publisher=Chicago Tribune|access-date = March 6, 2014}} Her brother, Alan Page Fiske, is an anthropologist at UCLA. Fiske's grandmother and great grandmother were suffragists.{{cite journal|title=Susan T. Fiske: Award for distinguished scientific contributions|journal=American Psychologist|year=2010|volume=65|issue=8|pages=695–706|doi=10.1037/a0020437|pmid=21058759}} Two nieces and her daughter all have psychology PhDs. In 1969, Susan Fiske enrolled at Radcliffe College for her undergraduate degree in social relations, where she graduated magna cum laude in 1973. She received her PhD from Harvard University in 1978, for her thesis titled Attention and the Weighting of Behavior in Person Perception. She currently resides in Vermont, with her husband Douglas Massey, a retired Princeton sociologist.

Career

The last semester of Fiske's senior year, she worked with Shelley Taylor, an assistant professor at Harvard, studying social cognition, particularly the effect attention has in social situations. After graduation, Fiske continued in the field of social cognition. There is conflict between the fields of social psychology and cognitive psychology, and some researchers want to keep these two fields separate. Fiske felt that significant knowledge could be attained by combining the fields. Fiske's experience with this conflict and her interest in the field of social cognition resulted in Fiske's and Taylor's book Social Cognition. This book provides an overview of the developing theories and concepts emerging in the field of social cognition, while explaining the use cognitive processes to understand social situations, ourselves and others. Fiske and Steven Neuberg went on to develop one of the first dual process models of social cognition, the "continuum model."

She gave expert testimony in the landmark case, Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins which was eventually heard by the Supreme Court of the United States,{{cite journal | last1 = Fiske | first1 = S. T. | last2 = Bersoff | first2 = D. N. | last3 = Borgida | first3 = E. | last4 = Deaux | first4 = K. | last5 = Heilman | first5 = M. E. | year = 1991 | title = Social science research on trial: The use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins | journal = American Psychologist | volume = 46 | issue = 10| pages = 1049–1060 | doi=10.1037/0003-066x.46.10.1049| s2cid = 18888481 }} making her the first social psychologist to testify in a gender discrimination case. This testimony led to a continuing interest in the use of psychological science in legal contexts.Borgida, E., & Fiske, S. T. (Eds.) (2008). Beyond common sense: Psychological science in the courtroom. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

Working with Peter Glick, Fiske analyzed the interdependence of male-female interactions, leading to the development of ambivalent sexism theory. She also examined gender differences in social psychologists' publication rates and citations within the influential psychology journal, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. The male authors in the sample submitted more articles and had higher acceptance rates (18% vs. 14%). Women's impact was the same as men's as measured through the number of citations in textbooks and handbooks, so women were more cited per article published.{{cite journal | last1 = Cikara | first1 = M. | last2 = Rudman | first2 = L. | last3 = Fiske | first3 = S. | year = 2012 | title = Dearth by a thousand cuts?: Accounting for gender differences in top-ranked publication rates in social psychology | journal = Journal of Social Issues | volume = 68 | issue = 2| pages = 263–285 | doi = 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01748.x | pmid = 24748688 | pmc = 3991494 }}

Fiske worked with Peter Glick and Amy Cuddy to develop the Stereotype Content Model. This model explains that warmth and competence differentiate out group stereotypes.

Fiske has been involved in the field of social cognitive neuroscience. This field examines how neural systems are involved in social processes, such as person perception.{{cite journal | last1 = Ochsner | first1 = K. N. | last2 = Lieberman | first2 = M. D. | year = 2001 | title = The emergence of social cognitive neuroscience | journal = American Psychologist | volume = 56 | issue = 9| pages = 717–734 | doi = 10.1037/0003-066X.56.9.717 | pmid = 11558357 }} Fiske's own work has examined neural systems involved in stereotyping,{{cite journal | last1 = Fiske | first1 = S. T. | year = 2012 | title = Journey to the edges: Social structures and neural maps of intergroup processes | journal = British Journal of Social Psychology | volume = 51 | issue = 1| pages = 1–12 | doi=10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02092.x | pmid=22435843 | pmc=3641691}} intergroup hostility,{{cite journal | last1 = Cikara | first1 = M. | last2 = Fiske | first2 = S. T. | year = 2011 | title = Bounded empathy: Neural responses to outgroup targets' (mis)fortunes | journal = Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience | volume = 23 | issue = 12| pages = 3791–3803 | doi=10.1162/jocn_a_00069 | pmid=21671744 | pmc=3792561}} and impression formation.{{cite journal | last1 = Ames | first1 = D. L. | last2 = Fiske | first2 = S. T. | year = 2013 | title = Outcome dependency alters the neural substrates of impression formation | journal = NeuroImage | volume = 83 | pages = 599–608 | doi=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.001 | pmid=23850465 | pmc=4478593}}

She has authored over 400 publications and has written several books, including her 2010 work Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology{{Cite web |url= http://www.fabbs.org/about-fabbs/speakers-bureau/fiske/ |title= Susan T. Fiske, PhD |work= Federation of Associations in Behavioral & Brain Sciences |access-date= April 6, 2013}} and Social Cognition, a graduate level text that defined the now-popular subfield of social cognition. She has edited the Annual Review of Psychology (with Daniel Schacter and Shelley Taylor) and the Handbook of Social Psychology (with Daniel Gilbert and the late Gardner Lindzey). Other books include Envy Up, Scorn Down: How Status Divides Us, which describes how people constantly compare themselves to others, with toxic effects on their relationships at home, at work, in school, and in the world,Science, 2011, 333, 289-90. and The Human Brand: How We Relate to People, Products, and Companies.Malone, C., & Fiske, S. T. (2013). The Human Brand: How We Relate to People, Products, and Companies. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. She serves on the Board of Directors of Annual Reviews.{{Cite web |title=Annual Reviews Board of Directors |url=https://www.annualreviews.org/about/our-team |website=Annual Reviews}}

Research

Her four most well-known contributions to the field of psychology are the stereotype content model,{{Cite book |last1= Whitley |first1= Bernard E. |last2= Kite |first2= Mary E. |title= The Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination |year= 2010 |edition= 2nd |publisher= Cengage Learning |location= Belmont, CA |page= 226 |isbn= 978-0-495-59964-7 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=mXSJEjl4uZYC&pg=PA226 }}{{cite journal |last1= Fiske |first1= Susan T. |last2= Cuddy |first2= Amy J. C. |last3= Glick |first3= Peter | last4= Xu | first4= Jun |year= 2002 |title= A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow From Perceived Status and Competition |journal= Journal of Personality and Social Psychology |volume= 82 |issue= 6 |pages= 878–902 |doi= 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 |url= http://www.cos.gatech.edu/facultyres/Diversity_Studies/Fiske_StereotypeContent.pdf |pmid=12051578|citeseerx= 10.1.1.320.4001 |s2cid= 17057403 }} ambivalent sexism theory, the continuum model of impression formation,Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influence of formation and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press. and the power-as-control theory.{{cite journal | last1 = Fiske | first1 = S. T. | year = 1993 | title = Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping | journal = American Psychologist | volume = 48 | issue = 6| pages = 621–628 | doi=10.1037/0003-066x.48.6.621| pmid = 8328729 }} She is also known for the term cognitive miser, coined with her graduate adviser Shelley E. Taylor, referring to individuals' tendencies to use cognitive shortcuts and heuristics.{{Cite book |editor1-last= Brannigan |editor1-first= Gary G. |editor2-last= Merrens |editor2-first= Matthew R. |year= 2005 |title= The social psychologists: Research adventures |location= New York |publisher= McGraw Hill |pages= 18–32 |isbn= 978-0-07-007234-3 |chapter= Susan T. Fiske |chapter-url-access= registration |chapter-url= https://archive.org/details/socialpsychologi0000unse }}{{Cite book |last= Wallace |first= Patricia |title= The Psychology of the Internet |year= 1999 |location= Cambridge, UK |publisher= Cambridge University Press |page= 19 |isbn= 978-0-521-63294-2 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=k0Z2-I0zrDgC&pg=PA19 }}

=Stereotype content model=

The stereotype content model (SCM) is a psychological theory arguing that people tend to perceive social groups along two fundamental dimensions: warmth and competence.{{Cite journal|last=Fiske|first=Susan T.|date=2018-02-28|title=Stereotype Content: Warmth and Competence Endure|journal=Current Directions in Psychological Science|volume=27|issue=2|pages=67–73|doi=10.1177/0963721417738825|pmid=29755213|pmc=5945217|issn=0963-7214}} Warmth describes the group's perceived intent (friendly and trustworthy or not); competence describes their perceived ability to act on their intent. The SCM was originally developed to understand the social classification of groups within the population of the U.S. However, the SCM has since been applied to analyzing social classes and structures across countries{{Cite journal|last1=Durante |first1=Federica |last2=Fiske |first2=Susan T. |last3=Gelfand |first3=Michele J. |author3-link=Michele J. Gelfand |last4=Crippa |first4=Franca |last5=Suttora |first5=Chiara |last6=Stillwell |first6=Amelia |last7=Asbrock |first7=Frank |last8=Aycan |first8=Zeynep |last9=Bye |first9=Hege H. |date=2017-01-09 |title=Ambivalent stereotypes link to peace, conflict, and inequality across 38 nations |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=114 |issue=4 |pages=669–674 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1611874114 |pmid=28069955 |pmc=5278477 |bibcode=2017PNAS..114..669D |issn=0027-8424 |doi-access=free}} and history.{{Cite journal|last1=Durante|first1=Federica|last2=Volpato|first2=Chiara|last3=Fiske|first3=Susan T.|date=2009|title=Using the stereotype content model to examine group depictions in Fascism: An archival approach|journal=European Journal of Social Psychology|volume=40|issue=3|pages=10.1002/ejsp.637|doi=10.1002/ejsp.637|pmid=24403646|pmc=3882081|issn=0046-2772}}

Most samples view their own middle class as both warm and competent, but they view refugees, homeless people, and undocumented immigrants as neither warm nor competent. The SCM's innovation is identifying mixed stereotypes—high on competence but low on warmth (e.g., rich people) or high on warmth but low on competence (e.g., elderly people).{{Cite journal|last1=Durante|first1=Federica|last2=Tablante|first2=Courtney Bearns|last3=Fiske|first3=Susan T.|date=March 2017|title=Poor but Warm, Rich but Cold (and Competent): Social Classes in the Stereotype Content Model|journal=Journal of Social Issues|volume=73|issue=1|pages=138–157|doi=10.1111/josi.12208|issn=0022-4537}} Nations with higher income inequality tend to use these mixed stereotypes more frequently.

Groups’ perceived cooperativeness predicts their perceived warmth, and this dimension reflects the importance of intent. Warmth predicts active helping and harming.{{Cite journal|last1=Cuddy|first1=Amy J. C.|last2=Fiske|first2=Susan T.|last3=Glick|first3=Peter|date=2007|title=The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes.|journal=Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|volume=92|issue=4|pages=631–648|doi=10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631|pmid=17469949|s2cid=16399286 |issn=1939-1315}} A group's perceived status predicts its stereotypic competence, so this reflects a belief in meritocracy, that people get what they deserve. Competence predicts passive helping and harming.

=Ambivalent sexism theory=

Fiske and Peter Glick developed the ambivalent sexism inventory (ASI) as a way of understanding prejudice against women.{{cite journal | last1 = Glick | first1 = P. | last2 = Fiske | first2 = S. T. | year = 1996 | title = The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism | journal = Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | volume = 70 | issue = 3| pages = 491–512 | doi=10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491| citeseerx = 10.1.1.470.9865 }} The ASI posits two sub-components of gender stereotyping: hostile sexism (hostility towards nontraditional women), and benevolent sexism (idealizing and protecting traditional women). The theory posits that men and women's intimate interdependence, coupled with men's average status advantage, requires incentives for women who cooperate (benevolent sexism) and punishment for women who resist (hostile sexism).{{Citation|last1=Glick|first1=Peter|title=Ambivalent sexism|date=2001|work=Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 33|pages=115–188|publisher=Elsevier|isbn=9780120152339|last2=Fiske|first2=Susan T.|doi=10.1016/s0065-2601(01)80005-8}} Both men and women can endorse hostile sexism and benevolent sexism, though men on average score higher than women, especially on hostile sexism.{{Cite journal|last1=Glick|first1=Peter|last2=Fiske|first2=Susan T.|date=2001|title=An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality.|journal=American Psychologist|volume=56|issue=2|pages=109–118|doi=10.1037/0003-066x.56.2.109|pmid=11279804|issn=0003-066X}} Though HS and BS entail opposite attitudinal dispositions toward women, they are positively correlated. {{Cite journal |last1=Glick |first1=Peter |last2=Fiske |first2=Susan T. |last3=Mladinic |first3=Antonio |last4=Saiz |first4=José L. |last5=Abrams |first5=Dominic |last6=Masser |first6=Barbara |last7=Adetoun |first7=Bolanle |last8=Osagie |first8=Johnstone E. |last9=Akande |first9=Adebowale |last10=Alao |first10=Amos |last11=Annetje |first11=Barbara |last12=Willemsen |first12=Tineke M. |last13=Chipeta |first13=Kettie |last14=Dardenne |first14=Benoit |last15=Dijksterhuis |first15=Ap |date=2000 |title=Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. |url=https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763 |journal=Journal of Personality and Social Psychology |language=en |volume=79 |issue=5 |pages=763–775 |doi=10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763 |pmid=11079240 |hdl=11511/40492 |issn=1939-1315|hdl-access=free }} The ASI appears useful across nations.{{Cite journal|last1=Glick|first1=Peter|last2=Fiske|first2=Susan T.|last3=Mladinic|first3=Antonio|last4=Saiz|first4=José L.|last5=Abrams|first5=Dominic|last6=Masser|first6=Barbara|last7=Adetoun|first7=Bolanle|last8=Osagie|first8=Johnstone E.|last9=Akande|first9=Adebowale|date=2000|title=Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures.|journal=Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|volume=79|issue=5|pages=763–775|doi=10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763|pmid=11079240|issn=0022-3514|hdl=11511/40492|hdl-access=free}} The authors have also developed a parallel scale of ambivalence toward men.{{Cite journal|last1=Glick|first1=Peter|last2=Fiske|first2=Susan T.|date=1999|title=The Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory|journal=Psychology of Women Quarterly|volume=23|issue=3|pages=519–536|doi=10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x|s2cid=145242896|issn=0361-6843}} According to a recent review, the ASI scale has been used by 654 peer-reviewed studies with adult populations. {{Cite journal |last1=Bareket |first1=Orly |last2=Fiske |first2=Susan T. |date=2023 |title=A systematic review of the ambivalent sexism literature: Hostile sexism protects men's power; benevolent sexism guards traditional gender roles. |url=https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/bul0000400 |journal=Psychological Bulletin |language=en |volume=149 |issue=11–12 |pages=637–698 |doi=10.1037/bul0000400 |pmid=37824246 |issn=1939-1455|url-access=subscription |doi-access=free }}

=Power-as-control theory=

Power-as-control theory aims to explain how social power motivates people to heed or ignore others. In this framework, power is defined as control over valued resources and over others' outcomes. Low-power individuals attend to those who control resources, while powerful people need not attend to low-power individuals (since high-power individuals can, by definition, get what they want).{{cite journal | last1 = Fiske | first1 = S. T. | year = 1993 | title = Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping | journal = American Psychologist | volume = 48 | issue = 6| pages = 621–628 | doi = 10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621 | pmid = 8328729 }}

=Continuum model of impression formation=

This model describes the process by which we form impressions of others. Impression formation is framed as depending on two factors: The available information and the perceiver's motivations.Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. Guilford Press. According to the model, these two factors help to explain people's tendency to apply stereotyping processes vs. individuating processes when forming social impressions.

Response to 'replication crisis'

With the replication crisis of psychology earning attention, Fiske drew controversy for calling out critics of psychology.{{Cite news|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/susan-fiske-methodological-terrorism-2016-9?r=US&IR=T|title=Scientists are furious after a famous psychologist accused her peers of 'methodological terrorism'|work=Business Insider|access-date=2017-10-04}}{{Cite news|url=https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/observer/obsonline/draft-of-observer-column-sparks-strong-social-media-response.html|title=Draft of Observer Column Sparks Strong Social Media Response|work=Association for Psychological Science|access-date=2017-10-04}}{{Cite news|url=http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/10/inside-psychologys-methodological-terrorism-debate.html|title=Inside Psychology's 'Methodological Terrorism' Debate|last=Singal|first=Jesse|work=Science of Us|access-date=2017-10-04}} In a letter intended for publication in APS Observer, she referred to these unnamed "adversaries" as "methodological terrorist" and "self-appointed data police", and said that criticism of psychology should only be expressed in private or through contacting the journals. Columbia University statistician and political scientist Andrew Gelman, "well-respected among the researchers driving the replication debate", responded to Fiske, saying that she had found herself willing to tolerate the "dead paradigm" of faulty statistics and had refused to retract publications even when errors were pointed out.{{Cite news|url=http://andrewgelman.com/2017/10/04/breaking-pnas-changes-slogan/|title=BREAKING . . . . . . . PNAS updates its slogan! - Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science|date=2017-10-04|work=Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science|access-date=2017-10-04}} He added that during her tenure as editor a number of papers edited by her were found to be based on extremely weak statistics; one of Fiske's own published papers had a major statistical error and "impossible" conclusions.

After the leak of her letter, she tempered the language in the published APS Observer column, removing the term "methodological terrorists".{{Cite web|url=https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/observer/obsonline/draft-of-observer-column-sparks-strong-social-media-response.html|title=Draft of Observer Column Sparks Strong Social Media Response|website=Association for Psychological Science|access-date=2019-01-09}} In the column, she expressed concern that although peer critiques are valuable, peer critique through social media outlets "can encourage a certain amount of uncurated, unfiltered denigration." She elaborated: "In a few rare but chilling cases, self-appointed data police are volunteering critiques" that "attack the person, not just the work; they attack publicly, without quality controls; they have reportedly sent their unsolicited, unvetted attacks to tenure-review committees and public-speaking sponsors; they have implicated targets' family members and advisors."{{Cite journal|last=Fiske|first=APS Past President Susan T.|date=2016-10-31|title=A Call to Change Science's Culture of Shaming|url=https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/a-call-to-change-sciences-culture-of-shaming|journal=APS Observer|volume=29|issue=9}} Since writing the column, Fiske has published peer-reviewed advice about publishing rigorous research in the 21st century{{Cite journal|last=Fiske|first=Susan T.|date=2016|title=How to publish rigorous experiments in the 21st century|journal=Journal of Experimental Social Psychology|volume=66|pages=145–147|doi=10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.006|pmid=30555180|pmc=6294447|issn=0022-1031}} and about adversarial collaboration as a remedy to public incivility among disagreeing perspectives.{{Cite journal|last=Fiske|first=Susan T.|date=2017|title=Going in Many Right Directions, All at Once|journal=Perspectives on Psychological Science|volume=12|issue=4|pages=652–655|doi=10.1177/1745691617706506|pmid=28727963|pmc=5520646|issn=1745-6916}}

Awards and achievements

Fiske became an elected member of the National Academy of Sciences in 2013. In 2011, Fiske was elected into the Fellowship of the British Academy. In 2010, she was awarded the American Psychological Association Distinguished Scientific Contribution Award. She received numerous awards in 2009, including a Guggenheim Fellowship, the Association for Psychological Science William James Fellow Award, and the Society for Personality and Social Psychology Donald Campbell Award.{{cite web|url=http://www.gf.org/fellows/16603-susan-t-fiske|title=Susan T. Fiske|work=John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation|access-date=August 31, 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130104012930/http://www.gf.org/fellows/16603-susan-t-fiske|archive-date=January 4, 2013}}{{cite web |url= http://www.fiskelab.org/people/ |title= The Fiske Lab – People |publisher= Princeton University |access-date= September 3, 2012}} In 2008, Fiske received the Staats Award for Unifying Psychology, from the American Psychological Association. In 2003, she was awarded the Thomas Ostrom Award from the International Social Cognition Network and for 2019 the BBVA Foundation Frontiers of Knowledge Award in Social Sciences.[https://www.frontiersofknowledgeawards-fbbva.es/noticias/the-bbva-foundation-recognizes-psychologists-susan-fiske-and-shelley-taylor-the-pioneers-of-social-cognition-who-revealed-the-role-of-cognitive-bias-in-social-relations/ BBVA Foundation Frontiers of Knowledge Award 2019]

Fiske was awarded honorary degrees from the University of Granada in 2017, University of Basel in 2013, the University of Leiden in 2009 and the Université catholique de Louvain in 1995.

She served as past president of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Division 8 of the American Psychological Association, the Federation of Associations in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, the Foundation for the Advancement of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, and the American Psychological Society (now the Association for Psychological Science). She is also a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the American Academy of Political and Social Science. She was elected to the American Philosophical Society in 2014.{{Cite web|title=APS Member History|url=https://search.amphilsoc.org/memhist/search?creator=Susan+T.+Fiske&title=&subject=&subdiv=&mem=&year=&year-max=&dead=&keyword=&smode=advanced|access-date=2021-03-12|website=search.amphilsoc.org}}

A quantitative analysis published in 2014 identified Fiske as the 22nd most eminent researcher in the modern era of psychology (12th among living researchers, 2nd among women).{{cite journal | last1 = Diener | first1 = E. | last2 = Oishi | first2 = S. | last3 = Park | first3 = J. | year = 2014 | title = An incomplete list of eminent psychologists of the modern era | doi = 10.1037/arc0000006 | journal = Archives of Scientific Psychology | volume = 2 | issue = 1| pages = 20–31 | doi-access = free }}

=Books=

{{cite book | last1 = Fiske | first1 = Susan T. | title = Envy up, scorn down: How status divides us | publisher = Russell Sage Foundation | location = New York | year = 2011 | isbn = 978-0-87154-464-3 }}
{{cite book | last1 = Todorov | first1 = Alexander T. | last2 = Fiske | first2 = Susan T. | last3 = Prentice | first3 = Deborah | title = Social neuroscience: Toward understanding the underpinnings of the social mind | publisher = Oxford University Press | location = New York | year = 2011 | isbn = 978-0-19-531687-2 }}
{{cite book | last1 = Fiske | first1 = Susan T. | last2 = Markus | first2 = Hazel R. | title = Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction | publisher = Russell Sage Foundation | location = London | year = 2012 | isbn = 978-0-87154-479-7 }}
{{cite book | last1 = Fiske | first1 = Susan T. | last2 = Taylor | first2 = Shelley E. | author2-link = Shelley E. Taylor | title = Social cognition: From brains to culture | edition = 2nd | publisher = Sage | location = London | year = 2013 | isbn = 978-1446258156 }}
{{cite book | last = Fiske | first = Susan T. | title = Social beings | edition = 4th | publisher = Wiley | location = New York | year = 2014 }}
Editor of the 2004, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 editions of Annual Review of Psychology
Editor of the 2010 edition of Handbook of Social Psychology
Editor of the 2012 edition of the Sage Handbook of Social Cognition
Editor of Sage Major Works in Social Cognition (2013)
Sternberg, R. J., Fiske, S. T., & Foss, D. J. (Eds.). (2016). Scientists making a difference. Cambridge University Press.{{Cite book |title=Scientists making a difference: one hundred eminent behavioral and brain scientists talk about their most important contributions |date=2016 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-56637-8 |editor-last=Sternberg |editor-first=Robert J. |location=New York, NY, USA |editor-last2=Fiske |editor-first2=Susan T. |editor-last3=Foss |editor-first3=Donald J.}}

=Selected journal articles=

{{Cite book | last1 = Fiske | first1 = Susan T. |last2 = Taylor | first2 = S. E. | title = Salience, attention, and attribution: Top-of-the-head phenomena. | series = Advances in Experimental Social Psychology | volume = 11 | pages = 249–288 | year = 1978 | doi = 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60009-x | isbn = 9780120152117 }}
{{Cite journal | last1 = Fiske | first1 = Susan T. |last2 = Taylor | first2 = S. E. |last3 = Etcoff | first3 = N. L. |last4 = Ruderman | first4 = A. J.| title = Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping | journal = Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | volume = 36 | issue = 7 | pages = 778–793 | year = 1978 | doi=10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.778}}
{{Cite journal | last = Fiske | first = Susan T. | title = Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior | journal = Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | volume = 38 | issue = 6 | pages = 889–906 | year = 1980 | doi=10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.889}}
{{Cite journal | last1 = Fiske | first1 = Susan T. |last2 = Abelson | first2 = R.P. |last3 = Kinder | first3 = D.R. |last4 = Peters | first4 = M.D. | title = Affective and semantic components in political person perception | journal = Journal of Personality and Social Psychology| volume = 42| issue = 4 | pages = 619–630| year = 1982 | doi = 10.1037/0022-3514.42.4.619 }}
{{Cite book | last1 = Fiske | first1 = Susan T. | last2 = Neuberg | first2 = S. L. | title = A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation | series = Advances in Experimental Social Psychology | volume = 23 | pages = 1–74 | year = 1990 | doi=10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60317-2| isbn = 9780120152230 }}
{{Cite journal | last = Fiske | first = Susan T. | title = Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping | journal = American Psychologist | volume = 48 | issue = 6 | pages = 621–628 | year = 1993| doi=10.1037/0003-066x.48.6.621| pmid = 8328729 }}
{{Cite journal | last = Fiske | first = Susan T. | title = Social cognition and social perceptions | journal = Annual Review of Psychology | volume = 44 | issue = 1 | pages = 155–194 | doi = 10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.001103 | date = February 1993 | pmid = 8434891 }}
{{Cite journal | last1 = Fiske | first1 = Susan T. | last2 = Glick | first2 = P. | title = The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism | journal = Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | volume = 70 | issue = 3 | pages = 491–512 |year = 1996 | doi=10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491| citeseerx = 10.1.1.470.9865 }}
{{Cite journal | last = Fiske | first = Susan T. | title = Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination | journal = Handbook of Social Psychology | edition= 4 | volume = 2| issue = 1 | pages = 357–411 | year = 1998 }}
{{Cite journal | last1 = Fiske | first1 = Susan T. |last2 = Glick | first2 = P. | title = An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications of gender inequality | journal = American Psychologist | volume = 56 | issue = 2 | pages = 109–118 | year = 2001 | doi=10.1037/0003-066x.56.2.109 | pmid=11279804}}
{{Cite journal | last1 = Fiske | first1 = Susan T. | last2 = Cuddy | first2 = Amy J.C. | last3 = Glick | first3 = Peter | last4 = Xu | first4 = Jun | title = A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition | journal = Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | volume = 82 | issue = 6 | pages = 878–902 | doi = 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 | date = June 2002 | pmid = 12051578 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.320.4001 | s2cid = 17057403 }}
{{Cite journal | last1 = Fiske | first1 = Susan T.|author-link2=Eugene Borgida | last2=Borgida | first2 = Eugene | title = Providing expert knowledge in an adversarial context: social cognitive science in employment discrimination cases | journal = Annual Review of Law and Social Science | volume = 4 | issue = 1 | pages = 123–148 | doi = 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172350 | date = August 2008 | doi-access = free }}
{{Cite journal | last1 = Cikara | first1 = Mina | last2 = Eberhardt | first2 = Jennifer L. | last3 = Fiske | first3 = Susan T. | title = From agents to objects: sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets | journal = Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience | volume = 23 | issue = 3 | pages = 540–551 | doi = 10.1162/jocn.2010.21497 | date = December 2010 | pmid = 20350187 | pmc=3801174}}

References

External links

[https://psych.princeton.edu/person/susan-fiske Fiske's Page at Princeton]
[http://fiske.socialpsychology.org/ Social Psychology Network Professional Profile]

Category:20th-century American psychologists

Category:21st-century American psychologists

Category:American women psychologists

Category:American social psychologists

Category:American women neuroscientists

Category:American neuroscientists

Category:Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences alumni

Category:Princeton University faculty

Category:Living people

Category:1952 births

Category:Radcliffe College alumni

Category:Fellows of the American Academy of Political and Social Science