Talk:2020 Delhi riots#Consulting administrators
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Controversial|date=February 2020}}
{{Indian English}}
{{ITN talk|26 February|2020|oldid=942708789}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Death|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Disaster management|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Fire Service|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Hinduism|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject India|importance=High|politics=yes|politics-importance=High|delhi=yes|delhi-importance=high|history=y|assess-date=February 2020}}
{{WikiProject Islam|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Law|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Law Enforcement|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Low|Interfaith=yes}}
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=low}}
}}
{{Press
| subject = article
| author = Rachel Chitra
| title = 1600 edits on Delhi riots, Wiki wars turn fierce on ideology
| org = The Times of India
| url = https://www.pressreader.com/india/the-times-of-india-new-delhi-edition/20200314/282067689002544
| date = 14 March 2020
| accessdate = 15 March 2020
| author2 = Sravasti Dasgupta
| title2 = 'Biased, anti-Hindu' — campaign begins against Wikipedia after it urges Indians to donate
| org2 = ThePrint
| url2 = https://theprint.in/india/biased-anti-hindu-campaign-begins-against-wikipedia-after-it-urges-indians-to-donate/472980/
| date2 = 2 August 2020
| accessdate2 = 3 August 2020
| subject3 = article
| author3 = Omer Benjakob
| title3 = A vicious culture war is tearing through Wikipedia
| org3 = Wired
| url3 = https://www.wired.co.uk/article/wikipedia-culture-war
| date3 = 5 November 2020
| quote3 =
| archiveurl3 =
| archivedate3 =
| accessdate3 = 6 November 2020
| subject4 = article
| author4 = Nishant Kauntia
| title4 = The Edit Wars: How Wikipedia earned the ire of the Hindu Right
| org4 = The Caravan
| url4 = https://caravanmagazine.in/media/wikipedia-earned-ire-hindu-right
| date4 = 30 November 2020
| quote4 =
| archiveurl4 =
| archivedate4 =
| accessdate4 = 9 December 2020
| subject5 = article
| author5 = Times Fact Check
| title5 = FAKE ALERT: Indian American Muslim Council falsely claims that all dead during Delhi riots were Muslims
| org5 = The Times of India
| url5 = https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/times-fact-check/news/fake-alert-indian-american-muslim-council-falsely-claims-that-all-dead-during-delhi-riots-were-muslims/articleshow/85213121.cms
| date5 = 10 August 2021
| quote5 =
| archiveurl5 =
| archivedate5 =
| accessdate5 = 1 January 2022
}}
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ipa|blp|1RR=yes|BRD=yes}}
{{Canvass warning|short=yes}}
{{Annual readership|days=15}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(14d)
| archive = Talk:2020 Delhi riots/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 20
| maxarchivesize = 90K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 2
}}
Why is this page called "RIOTS" but George Floyd one called "PROTEST"?
Why is this page called "RIOTS" but George Floyd one called "PROTEST"?
Because as per the information on wikipedia itself, the harm incurred by BLM "protests" was far greater than the one in Delhi.
Or does Wikipedia just like to spin the narrative in the leftist direction, no matter the bandwagon, while claiming to be neutral?
Don't tell me, you're gonna say wikipedia is "neutral," don't ya? 103.185.242.170 (talk) 13:42, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
:Because they are not the same. Slatersteven (talk) 13:43, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
::Nowhere does Wikipedia claim to be without bias or neutral. Wikipedia claims to have a neutral point of view, which is different. Bias in sources will be reflected in Wikipedia. Bias does not preclude the use of a source on Wikipedia unless they are so biased that they lack basic journalism standards or make things up out of whole cloth. If you're truly interested in having a civil, collaborative conversation about the title of this article, please do. If you just want drink the kool aid and rant about "leftists", do that somewhere else.
::As for the title, see WP:COMMONNAME. 331dot (talk) 16:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
:::So many word salads to say "suck it, leftists hold the oligarchy on media" 103.185.242.142 (talk) 17:34, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
::::Rupert Murdock is calling. 331dot (talk) 18:04, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Westren media is alwayways against Hindu .
In this Delhi riots topic you read it. If you don't know Hindu psychology. You will find hindu a villan. Any body who wrote this artical is biased.
He don't know citizenship amandment act 2019. That act is nothing to do with Indian citizen. but Muslim in India are just creating national drama. blocking national capital without proper reason.
On the name of that act 2019 CCA Muslim are targeting bjp government. CAA 2019 ACT IS not apply for any Indian citizen that set. Then why they are creating mess in all over india.
The writer of this artical is very biased he needs to study CAA 2019 ACT . 2409:4081:2EC8:C6D6:865A:E413:2BC5:12D5 (talk) 14:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
:This article does not have a single author. Please do not bring religious conflicts or bigotry here. Even if you are correct, bias does not in and of itself preclude the use of a source on Wikipedia, unless the outlet at issue is so biased that they make things up out of whole cloth with no basis whatsoever. A law or act itself is a primary source, whereas Wikipeda summarizes secondary sources. 331dot (talk) 14:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
:Read wp:soap. Slatersteven (talk) 14:29, 21 June 2025 (UTC)