Talk:2022 Buffalo shooting#Requested move 19 May 2022

{{Talk header}}

{{ITN talk|16 May|2022|oldid=1088094510}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=other|class=C|collapsed=yes|1=

{{WikiProject African diaspora|importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|terrorism=yes|terrorism-imp=Low|importance=Low|serialkiller=yes|serialkiller-imp=Low}}

{{WikiProject Death|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Firearms|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject New York (state)|importance=Low|Western=yes|Western-importance=Low|needs-image=no}}

{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|WPUS50=yes|UShistory=yes|UShistory-importance=low}}

}}

{{Press

|subject =

|author = Samantha Murphy Kelly

|title = Meet the Wikipedia editor who published the Buffalo shooting entry minutes after it started

|date = 20 May 2022

|org = CNN

|url = https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/20/tech/wikipedia-editors-breaking-news/index.html

|lang =

|quote =

|archiveurl =

|archivedate =

|accessdate =

}}

{{Banner holder|collapsed=yes|

{{Old moves |date=2022-05-14 |from=2022 Buffalo mass shooting |destination=2022 Buffalo shooting |result=moved |link=Special:Permalink/1087872749}}

{{Old moves |date=2022-05-15 |from=2022 Buffalo shooting |destination=2022 Buffalo, New York shooting |result=not moved |link=Special:Permalink/1087904789}}

{{Top 25 report|May 15 2022}}

}}

{{Annual readership}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|maxarchivesize = 70K

|counter = 5

|minthreadsleft = 2

|algo = old(180d)

|archive = Talk:2022 Buffalo shooting/Archive %(counter)d

|archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}}

}}

Perpetrator birthdate

OK, so I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2022_Buffalo_shooting&diff=prev&oldid=1249592348 originally removed] the perpetrator's supposed birthdate because it was not supported by the source(s) cited. I later [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2022_Buffalo_shooting&diff=prev&oldid=1251680041 readded it] in an invisible comment (which cannot be seen outside the page editor) because I figure I could find a source and unhide it later - that was removed as well. (I've seen this done in other articles to hide unsourced birthdates, e.g. Xanthe Huynh so I figured it would be acceptable)

This is the closest source I can find so far that says something regarding age: https://buffalonews.com/news/local/crime-courts/tops-mass-shooter-may-14-payton-gendron-death-penalty/article_7a533168-46a2-11ef-a6fa-8350336aa8f4.html

The quote in question is: "At the time of the Buffalo racist mass shooting, Gendron was 18 years, 10 months, and 28 days old – 328 days over the line established by the Supreme Court ruling." A [https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=May+14%2C+2022+-+18+years%2C+10+months%2C+and+28+days quick calculation] shows a birthdate of June 16, 2003.

I've seen this kind of back of the napkin date math used on other articles to calculate birthdates - sorry but cannot remember which ones. Open to hearing thoughts. :User:Wizzito | :User talk:Wizzito 02:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

:The website vice.com, which has not been declared unreliable, gives the DOB as June 20, 2003.[https://www.vice.com/en/article/buffalo-shooter-gun-mental-health-manifesto-payton-gendron/] WWGB (talk) 03:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

::Late, but good catch. :User:Wizzito | :User talk:Wizzito 23:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

::Are you unopposed to the source being added? :User:Wizzito | :User talk:Wizzito 19:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

A shooting is not a political movement, it's the action of a deranged individual.

The sidebar indicating this article is part of a series on neo-fascism isn't necessary. Open up the 'ideas' section in the sidebar and it has a laundry list of ideas that could be linked to hundreds of political groups, including vague ones like nationalism, autarky, and Christianity (and no other religion.) Was the shooter an anti-Marxist autarkist, as the list implies? Is Xi Jinping neo-fascist because he is a nationalist authoritarian? Make a list long enough and it includes everyone. I suggest we view shooters and their deranged thoughts as criminal psychology rather than trying to tie it into an ever-expanding political ideology that says both too much and too little. 108.4.138.67 (talk) 16:08, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:We go by what reliable sources say, not our own analyses. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:05, 9 April 2025 (UTC)