Talk:3548 Eurybates

I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :3548 Eurybates's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "johnston":

• From List of natural satellites: {{Cite web |last=Johnston |first=W. R. |date=30 December 2008 |title=(136199) Eris and Dysnomia |url=http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/astmoons/am-136199.html |access-date=2016-12-01 |website=Johnston's Archive}}
• From Dimorphos: {{cite web |title=(65803) Didymos |website=www.johnstonsarchive.net |url=http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/astmoons/am-65803.html |access-date=2021-11-11}}
• From Namaka (moon):

  {{cite web

  | url = http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/astmoons/am-136108.html

  | author = Wm. Robert Johnston

  | title = (136108) Haumea, Hi'iaka, and Nāmaka

  | date = 17 September 2008

  | access-date = 2008-09-18

  }}

• From (208996) 2003 AZ84: {{cite web | url=http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/astmoons/am-208996.html | title=(208996) 2003 AZ84 | publisher=Johnston's Archive | date=20 September 2014 | accessdate=16 January 2018 | last=Johnston | first=Wm. Robert}}
• From 38628 Huya: {{cite web

  |first=Wm. Robert |last=Johnston

  |work=Johnston's Archive

  |date=21 September 2014

  |title=(38628) Huya

  |url=http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/astmoons/am-38628.html

  |access-date=31 October 2019}}

• From Hiʻiaka (moon):

  {{cite web

  | url = http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/astmoons/am-136108.html

  | author = Wm. Robert Johnston

  | title = (136108) Haumea, Hiʻiaka, and Nāmaka

  | date = 17 September 2008

  | access-date = 2008-09-18

  }}

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

• I would be inclined not to split the (magnitude 26) moon Queta from the article until the section is either better developed and/or we get closer to the 2027 arrival of Lucy. -- Kheider (talk) 07:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
• :Agreed, this is too close to call for a split at this point. TheWhistleGag (talk) 20:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)