Talk:75 Years of Friendship through Cricket Event#Requested move 7 March 2025

:The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. – robertsky (talk) 09:39, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:75 Years of Friendship through Cricket Event → {{no redirect|Fourth Test, 2022–23 Border–Gavaskar Trophy}} – Standard naming convention for test matches, see :Category:Test cricket matches. Vestrian24Bio 03:29, 7 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 07:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

• Support Agletarang (talk) 17:28, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
• ~~Oppose~~ Comment The standard naming convention is for iconic matches where records were tumbled. This was a partnership sort of match played under this banner and logo. Convention will not hold here. Pharaoh496 (talk) 19:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
• :@Pharaoh496: that's not how naming conventions work on Wikipedia; read WP:NC. Vestrian24Bio 13:39, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
• ::If I can have more direction, which specific part of this guideline are you referring to? Pharaoh496 (talk) 22:51, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
• :::WP:CONSISTENT, WP:TITLECON - {{tq|titles for the same kind of subject should not differ in form or structure without good reason. Where multiple titles are available, and where titles are equally usable in terms of recognizability, naturalness, preciseness, and conciseness, then the title to be used should be consistent with titles used for similar or related topics in Wikipedia}} Vestrian24Bio 02:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
• ::::Same kind of subject - all other match titles have an exclusive focus on the match. this one does not. this needs to be more thought over. Pharaoh496 (talk) 06:04, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

:Note: Noticeboard for India-related topics, WikiProject Australian politics, alian Wikipedians' notice board, WikiProject Cricket, and WikiProject Australian sports have been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPath^talk 07:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

• Support for consistency with the others in the same tournament. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose - as a cricket match this is no more or less notable than any other Test match - CricInfo called it "a tedious draw" in its report ([https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/australia-in-india-2022-23-1348637/india-vs-australia-4th-test-1348655/match-report-5 source]). It's only special notability comes about as a result of the political events surrounding it, so that, or something like it, should be the name of the article. Without that, this is a strong delete at AfD for me - otherwise we're essentially saying that every modern Test match featuring India is notable (there'd probably be a case that could be made for that argument if anyone would care to try it). I can't, then, see how we should list this under the name of the match as we would we an actually notable-enough Test match. I'd argue that a lot of the match detail should also be removed from the article fwiw - this is a political event and most of the cricket coverage is really routine - someone caught someone off someone's bolding and someone scored some runs. I'm with CricInfo here Blue Square Thing (talk) 13:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose per Blue Square Thing  — Amakuru (talk) 13:26, 10 April 2025 (UTC)