Talk:Actinium(III) chloride#Requested move 25 May 2021

:The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved per consensus. No such user (talk) 12:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

----

• :Actinium(III) chloride → {{no redirect|Actinium chloride}}
• :Actinium(III) bromide → {{no redirect|Actinium bromide}}
• :Actinium(III) iodide → {{no redirect|Actinium iodide}}
• :Actinium(III) oxide → {{no redirect|Actinium oxide}}
• :Actinium(III) phosphate → {{no redirect|Actinium phosphate}}
• :Actinium(III) sulfide → {{no redirect|Actinium sulfide}}

– The +3 oxidation state is the only one known for actinium. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:30, 25 May 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:15, 3 June 2021 (UTC)—Relisting. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:11, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• Support. The current forms will make good redirects. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose. There is Actinium(II) hydride which has a +2 oxidation state. I don't really support not putting the ions there when it is not a group 1 or 2 metal. Keres🌑(talk • ctb) 23:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose. We overwhelmingly use Stock nomenclature for simple salts like this. --Project Osprey (talk) 22:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose HS chem was a long time ago, but isn't this per convention? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)