Talk:Adolf Hitler#rfc 417265B

{{Article history

|action1=FAC

|action1date=02:26, 26 July 2005

|action1link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Adolf Hitler/archive1

|action1result=not promoted

|action1oldid=19612729

|action2=GAN

|action2date=17:11, 19 December 2005

|action2result=listed

|action2oldid=31982874

|action3=GAR

|action3date=02:08, 22 April 2006

|action3result=delisted

|action3oldid=49509950

|action4=FAC

|action4date=16:41, 26 March 2007

|action4link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Adolf Hitler/archive2

|action4result=not promoted

|action4oldid=117993066

|action5=GAN

|action5date=2007-05-20

|action5result=failed

|action5oldid=132235459

|action6=PR

|action6date=2007-10-17

|action6link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Adolf Hitler/archive1

|action6result=Reviewed

|action6oldid=165201149

|action7=GAN

|action7date=2011-12-16

|action7link=Talk:Adolf Hitler/GA1

|action7result=listed

|action7oldid=466115580

|topic=World history

|currentstatus=GA

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes |class=GA|vital=yes|listas=Hitler, Adolf|blp=no|1=

{{WikiProject Biography|core=yes|military-work-group=y|military-priority=Top|politician-work-group=y|politician-priority=Top|attention=yes}}

{{WikiProject Military history|B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Biography=y|German=y|WWI=yes|WWII=y}}

}}

{{Press| subject = article | title = Topics that spark Wikipedia 'edit wars' revealed | org = BBC News | url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23354613 | date = 18 July 2013 | archiveurl = | archivedate = | accessdate = 18 July 2013 |author2 = Josh Fjelstad |title2 = The 100 Longest Entries On Wikipedia |org2 = BuzzFeed |url2 = http://www.buzzfeed.com/fjelstud/the-100-longest-entries-on-wikipedia#.opb19rX7o |date2 = 22 June 2011 |accessdate2 = 13 December 2014

| subject3 =

| author3 = Noam Cohen

| title3 = Wikipedia acts as a check on Putin’s false view of history

| org3 = The Washington Post

| url3 = https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/05/31/wikipedia-hitler-putin-lavrov/

| date3 = 31 May 2022

| quote3 =

}}

{{Banner holder |collapsed=yes |1=

{{Annual report|2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 200K

|counter = 65

|algo = old(14d)

|archive = Talk:Adolf Hitler/Archive %(counter)d

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| minthreadsleft = 3

}}

{{Archive box|auto=short|bot = lowercase sigmabot III|age = 14

|{{PrefixIndex|1=Talk:Adolf Hitler/H|redr=yes}}

/GA1

}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=Talk:Adolf Hitler/Archive index|mask=Talk:Adolf_Hitler/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}}

Factuality of parties

This page is incorrect. Obviously edited by left leaning people. You cant rewrite history. Page will be removed from google. Fix immediately 2601:405:4900:6000:4814:C284:18AA:D28A (talk) 17:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

:What do you even mean by this, is there any source for this claim or even specifics of what you take issue with? wiglett (talk) 01:50, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

National Socilaist Party

Hitler was against capitalism and was a self reported socialist. A true socialist. Page needs fixed or removed, permanently 2601:405:4900:6000:4814:C284:18AA:D28A (talk) 17:46, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

::RS say otherwise. Slatersteven (talk) 17:47, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

:Source? wiglett (talk) 01:50, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Duplicate info in lead

The lead mentions twice that six million people were killed. One of these occurrences should be deleted, I would propose the second one. PhotographyEdits (talk) 21:00, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

:I disagree; I think we should keep both. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:05, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

::The lead is supposed to be a summary of the remainder of the article, this fact is only mentioned once there. Making it more verbose is the opposite of summary style. PhotographyEdits (talk) 23:16, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

:::One of the uses is the briefest of mentions in the opening paragraph, the overview of AH's 'achievements'. The second is part of the impact of 'racial ideology' at the end of the lead. I don't find the repeat intrusive, don't see how one could adequately cover either topic without mention of this 'key fact' and therefore agree with Diannaa. Finding circomlocutive language to avoid the repetition might even lead to the text being more verbose, but what language do you suggest? Simply removing one or other wouldn't work IMO. Pincrete (talk) 04:54, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Here is a detailed rationale for my opinion: Many people only read the first paragraph, so it needs to be mentioned there. And it's included in the last paragraph of the lead in the summary of all the people that got killed directly and indirectly by the regime, so we need it there as well. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:04, 3 May 2025 (UTC)