Login
Login

Talk:Affirmative action#Aryanization compared to Affirmative action

{{Talk header}}

{{Not a forum}}

{{Controversial-issues}}

{{afd-merged-from|Mismatching|Mismatching|17 January 2011|date=March 2011}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Social Work|importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Business|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject India|importance=High|politics=yes|politics-importance=high}}

{{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Indian caste system|importance=Top}}

{{WikiProject Politics|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=Mid}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}

|maxarchivesize = 95K

|counter = 4

|minthreadsleft = 2

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(365d)

|archive = Talk:Affirmative action/Archive %(counter)d

}}

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis

{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/UCSD/Introduction_to_Policy_Analysis_(Spring) | assignments = Yajzel V | start_date = 2022-03-28 | end_date = 2022-05-30 }}

Combining "Support"/"Criticism" sections?

Normally, we try to avoid "Criticism" sections because they can present problems in achieving WP:NPOV. Perhaps, rather than having separate pro and ante sections, we should have one Responses or Analysis section, so that the main arguments can be raised in one place and either countered or supported in the same section. In my view, this will flow more organically, avoid duplication of content, and make it easier to achieve a neutral POV throughout.

Does anyone have any thoughts on this, before I make any bold edits? Lewisguile (talk) 10:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

:I support this change. I think readers are smart enough to distinguish support from criticism anyway. StephenMacky1 (talk) 11:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

::Brilliant. And re-reading both sections, they're not that long and they already include a mix of supporting and critical viewpoints. I think I know how I can do this so it flows a bit better, so I'll see if anyone objects first and then take a stab at this later on today or tomorrow. Lewisguile (talk) 11:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

:::It is a good change. I think similar combining support and criticism like that on other WP pages would help improve WP:NPOV generally. Jameson Nightowl (talk) 02:45, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

::::Agreed. It also flows better. Lewisguile (talk) 07:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)