Talk:Agent detection

I found this article having read the relevant section of the book I mention. I'm going to cite the book ( although I don't remember the specific page numbers ) and add a link to it in a new See Also section. This stub could use some work in becoming an article, and this is a start.

If a human grew up surrounded only by automated machines, wouldn't they be used to things happening automaticly instead of happening as the result of a intelligent agent? --TiagoTiago (talk) 21:36, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

: Are you asking if people can unlearn ( learn to ignore ) their agent-detector in a situation where it's constantly giving them false positives? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.124.22 (talk) 05:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Kansas_State_University/Introduction_to_Digital_Humanities_Spring_2024_(Spring) | assignments = Prokope45 | start_date = 2024-01-15 | end_date = 2024-05-10 }}

— Assignment last updated by Prokope45 (talk) 23:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello fellow contributors, I will be merging in a small change to the Evolutionary Origins section that add more context. If there are any needed changes, by all means contact me and I will ensure that it will be corrected. Thanks! --Prokope45 (talk) 22:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

I don't understand the table. It looks backward to me. I.e., in the upper left box, iif a signal is detected, and stimulus is present, and there is a response, that sounds like a Hit to me. Perhaps I am interpreting the table incorrectly, and if so, I suggest different wording or more clarification might help.

Just trying to help (not complaining!). Best wishes, Tim 208.103.112.69 (talk) 12:57, 28 March 2025 (UTC)