Talk:Anggun/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Anggun/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Anggun/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:51, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

:GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.
2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|aye}}
3. ::
4. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
5. :a (references): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|aye}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|aye}}
6. ::
7. It is broad in its coverage.
8. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|aye}}
9. ::
10. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
11. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|aye}}
12. ::
13. It is stable.
14. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|aye}}
15. ::
16. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
17. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|aye}}
18. ::
19. Overall:
20. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|aye}}
21. ::

----

Instead of listing the prose issues I edited the article and made changes I felt would improve it. The article contains repetitions such as "she" in the last section. In this section you repeated that she was influenced by Guns N' Roses, Bon Jovi, and Megadeth. In short, I am promoting the article, but the article should be checked for such small issues. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 11:42, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

• Fixed those I've found. Thanks for the review. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:47, 18 October 2012 (UTC)