Talk:Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Christianity|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Anglicanism|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject New Zealand|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Polynesia|importance=Mid}}
}}
{{old move|date=12 March 2025|destination=Anglican Church in New Zealand|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1285488567#Requested move 12 March 2025}}
WikiProject Anglicanism
A new WikiProject focussing on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion has just been initiated: WikiProject Anglicanism. Our goal is to improve and expand Anglican-reltaed articles. If anyone (Anglican or non-Anglican) is interested, read over the project page and consider signing up. Cheers! Fishhead64 06:40, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
woman diocesan
This article makes no mention of the fact that the first Anglican woman diocesan bishop (Barbara Harris was suffragan) was in this church.--Bhuck 13:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
:: If you know it and you can verify it, you can add it into the article. :) -- Bob K | Talk 16:15, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
::: I know that this is the case, but I don't know the details (who, which diocese, what year). I was hoping to find them out by looking at the article, but that didn't work. :-( --Bhuck 22:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
:[http://www.anglican.org.nz/history.htm Here] is a useful source for other questions as well. Penny Jamieson, 1990, Dunedin is the answer to my question.--Bhuck 10:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Accuracy
There seem to be a few inaccuracies in the article. It seems that the chuch no longer uses the title archbishop, and that the a bishop from each tikanga is elected as Co-Presiding Bishop, one of whom is elected Primate of the Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia. Currently, the Most Revd. William Brown Turei is Primate of the ACANZP and Bishop of Aotearoa, the Most Revd. David John Moxon is Bishop of Waikato and Co-Presiding Bishop, and the Most Revd. Jabez Leslie Bryce is Bishop of Polynesia and Co-Presiding Bishop. The Co-Presiding Bishop for the Dioceses in New Zealand is elected from among the seven diocesans; the four regional bishops of Te Pihopatanga o Aotearoa are effectively suffragans of the Bishop of Aotearoa; the Diocese of Polynesia has three important, regional suffragans too. — Gareth Hughes 14:02, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
: My understanding is that the term is still used. There is actually a Wikipedia article about this: Archbishop_of_New_Zealand The Angel of Islington 08:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Aotearoa IS New Zealand
Please consider changing the title of this article to "Anglican Church in Aotearoa/New Zealand and Polynesia" to avoid giving the impression that Aotearoa is just a small (culturally different) part of a larger country.W. Frank 16:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
:The trouble is, if you look at http://www.anglican.org.nz/, the church calls itself "Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia" with a comma. That's its official name, and it's not our job to change it here. —Angr 16:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
:: Your point is well taken. You're right, I'm wrong.W. Frank 07:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Uniform format proposal
A proposal is being floated at the project page that there be a standard format for organising each article about national provinces of the Anglican Communion, including this one. Please consider participating in the straw vote and discussion. Cheers! Fishhead64 21:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Personal Ordinariate
Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 05:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Famous politically-inspired translation change
Should be something on the dropping of the word "Zion" from the psalter for political reasons, which received world-wide news coverage in the 1980's: [http://www.liturgy.co.nz/blog/tag/christchurch], [http://www.kinderlibrary.ac.nz/files/documents/prayerbook/Carley%20Psalms%20for%20worship.pdf]
Considerable tidying needed
The article tries to mention who the primate(s)/archbishop(s) are in too many places, and is now inconsistent with itself.
The current situation is that there is an Archbishop from each tikanga and each is a Primate. Reference: http://www.anglican.org.nz/Directory/Primates
Disclaimer - I am currently employed by the Anglican Church (Taranaki Cathedral). dramatic (talk) 01:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=789219488 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090622115607/http://pbsusa.org/PBLinks.htm to http://anglicanprayerbook.nz/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://changingattitude.org.uk/archives/4354
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170413153151/http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/photograph/27677/civil-union-2005 to http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/photograph/27677/civil-union-2005
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160604064919/http://www.gaynz.com/articles/publish/2/printer_3751.php to http://www.gaynz.com/articles/publish/2/printer_3751.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160512113658/http://www.gaynz.com/articles/publish/2/article_18259.php to http://www.gaynz.com/articles/publish/2/article_18259.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Sexual abuse
This church has a history of sexual abuse of children in care, women, and even ordinands training for ordination. The church has consistently tried to cover this up. I think a section on this and ither controversies should be added to give a more balanced article. FairDinks (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Illegible section on ''Tikanga''
In the lead Tikanga is mentioned but never explained the Tikanga system heading would presumably explain what it is but I am now left with even more questions. This is the most confusing part of the article but other parts are also simply incomprehensible to a person unfamiliar with the inner workings of the New Zealand Anglican Church. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 12 March 2025
:The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) TarnishedPathtalk 10:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
----
:Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia → {{no redirect|Anglican Church in New Zealand}} – The full title of the church is never used in common parlance and is simply just referred to as the Anglican Church or Anglican Church in New Zealand. The proposed title is more concise and consistent with other churches e.g. Moravian Church, Episcopal Church (United States), and Eastern Orthodox Church Traumnovelle (talk) 02:33, 12 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:18, 19 March 2025 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:10, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
:Neutral on the specific question of whether it should be renamed - I think either way could be justified.
:*https://web.archive.org/web/20240919101059/https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2024/20-september/news/world/new-zealand-archbishop-anoints-newly-elected-maori-queen
:*https://web.archive.org/web/20240624211402/https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/06/25/reverend-rob-mccullough-abuser/
:*https://web.archive.org/web/20250314161031/https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/15920514.maori-traditions-make-new-bishop-ripon-feel-home/
:*https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-anglican-studies/article/abs/from-settlement-to-superdiversity-the-anglican-church-and-new-zealands-diversifying-population1/2AC26C5CF0911EEE0D24739B23DAA98E
:sources refer to the church in both ways. I think there should be some consideration of which is more common, but this is not demonstrated. it is wrong to use the word "never" in either direction. Landpin (talk) 16:17, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
::I said in common parlance. The second source is an op-ed for a poem, see this article from a co-editor of the publication where it is simply referred to as the Anglican Church: [https://newsroom.co.nz/2020/10/07/i-saw-you-praying-in-the-chapel/].
::The Cambridge source just uses the simpler unofficial name, as does Te Ara: [https://teara.govt.nz/en/anglican-church/page-3]
::Contemporary news about the church neglects the full title: [https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/anglican-church-leaders-support-te-tiriti-offer-christmas-message-of-hope/WDKWXFBBZREEBJ45GA6VZR56QM/] [https://www.1news.co.nz/2019/08/10/anglican-church-hands-over-160-year-old-flag-to-kingitanga/] [https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/08/20/restoration-of-christ-church-cathedral-on-hold/] (quote but uses just simply Anglican in the article) [https://www.1news.co.nz/2019/08/10/anglican-church-hands-over-160-year-old-flag-to-kingitanga/] [https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360486378/anglican-church-mends-rift-ngati-toa-parata-whanau-fight-treaty-principles-bill] [https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/125721946/anglican-church-knew-of-abuse-by-carer-but-promoted-him-anyway] Traumnovelle (talk) 19:34, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose, WP:COMMONNAME is not based on what is commonly said in general, but what is specifically used most by sources, of which none are shown in the proposal. Additionally it may be less WP:PRECISE as it technically covers more than just New Zealand which may be more confusing for readers, as well as the church appearing to deliberately use a long title to clarify its coverage. The title is too long for ngrams, but "Anglican Church in Aotearoa" (assuming it is followed by ", New Zealand and Polynesia") is [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Anglican+Church+in+Aotearoa%2CAnglican+Church+in+New+Zealand%2CAnglican+Church+of+Aotearoa%2CAnglican+Church+of+New+Zealand&year_start=2000&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3 more used] than just "Anglican Church in New Zealand", so weak oppose. DankJae 14:20, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- :The title is more WP:CONSISTENT with the way other church bodies are titled. Most of the ngrams results if you look into them are references. WP:PRECISE isn't about having the most accurate name as possible but instead about having a name that is unambiguous as possible. Traumnovelle (talk) 19:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- ::Which other church bodies? Landpin (talk) 00:04, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- :::Some examples are mentioned in the lead. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:11, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- ::::WP:CONSISTENT does not apply here, those are fully separate churches, there is little connection from this one to the other churches (nor is there convention for Anglican churches etc), the policy you should be citing is WP:COMMONNAME which they follow but fail to show evidence for it here. The proposed title doesn't improve any ambiguity but would cause more confusion as Fiji etc aren't part of New Zealand, so if anything is promoting a misconception like calling the Netherlands "Holland", calling the most populous part as the sole part. Still believe that clarifying that the church covers more than New Zealand and without evidence provided for the proposed still outweigh assumptions that readers just don't bother to use the long name. DankJae 09:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- :::::WP:PRECISE says 'Usually, titles should unambiguously define the topical scope of the article, but should be no more precise than that. For instance, Saint Teresa of Calcutta is too precise, as Mother Teresa is precise enough to indicate exactly the same topic. On the other hand, Columbia would not be precise enough to unambiguously identify the Columbia River.' The proposed title is precise enough to identify the topic. Traumnovelle (talk) 18:43, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- ::::::Potentially, it might be slightly misleading. For instance, it is actually quite confusing that the Church of England is not only the established Church of England, but also the established church of Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man. For the Church of England, not much can be done, because the name is confusing. In this case, potentially having the long form name of the church would avoid that sort of confusion. Someone might skimread the article and not immediately realise the zone which it operates in isn't just New Zealand. Landpin (talk) 19:27, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- :::::::That isn't the purpose of titles, otherwise we'd make titles are descriptive as possible. You should see WP:CRITERIA to understand what is looked for in an article title. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:29, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- ::::::::All of this discussion is pointless. It doesn't matter 'what people generally say' whether a title is 'too long,' or whether anyone THINKS it should be called something else. It IS called "Anglican Church of Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia." This is not only deeply culturally and theologically important, but it is simply ACCURATE. https://www.anglican.org.nz/About 139.80.239.165 (talk) 22:19, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- :::::::::It does matter what title people use (WP:COMMONNAME), whether it is too long (WP:CONCISE). We don't use official titles for article titles if a more suitable title exists. We also don't title articles to appease cultural and theological beliefs, because it is simply impossible to achieve that. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:39, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
:I am a member of governance bodies in the Anglican Church of Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia. It would be inaccurate and potentially offensive to the three Tikanga nature of our church, and to the two Archbishops who would have their archdioceses completely removed from the name of their church. Here are the canons, and you can find ANZAP's Constitution/Te Pouhere here also https://www.anglican.org.nz/Resources/Canons 222.155.78.93 (talk) 09:17, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
:Oppose - proposed name significantly reduces the accuracy and I don't think the examples of usage are enough to clearly state that the proposed title is the common name enough to justify a move. Turnagra (talk) 22:58, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
:Note: Wikipedia:New Zealand Wikipedians' notice board, WikiProject Polynesia, WikiProject Anglicanism, and WikiProject Christianity/Noticeboard have been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 11:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)