Talk:Annexation Party of British Columbia

Is this a real party, or is this a vanity article? Any Canadians who can explain more fully? john k 08:17, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

: I wrote up this article based on the website that is linked from it. The 'party' does appear to be a internet-only one-man band, but articles have been written on numerous of these creatures in the Canadian political parties area. I have no connection with the Annexation Party or its founder. (I'm new here, so I'm not really clear on the concept of 'vanity article'. Could you explain? Thanks.)

: Kevintoronto 13:20, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

::This party is official registered with Elections BC, the agency that conducts elections in the province. - Jord 04:17, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

:::Re the "vanity" question, all party members should view WP:COI as regards conflict-of-interest guidelines. If you are a member of the party, in other words, you should generally recuse yourself from edits/contributions here, especially insofar as deleting materials you may not like. I'm not saying this has happened here, but it's an issue in the big-party sites so a similar request/warning will be applied to their talkpages there as well.Skookum1 01:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on Annexation Party of British Columbia. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=744395975 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715204038/http://www.rosenblog.com/2005/04/23/sex_drugs_sloth_and_politics_in_bc.html to http://www.rosenblog.com/2005/04/23/sex_drugs_sloth_and_politics_in_bc.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)