Talk:Annpurna Devi#Requested move 17 March 2025

{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=activepol|class=Stub|listas=Yadav, Annapurna Devi|1=

{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes}}

{{WikiProject India|importance=Low|politics=yes|jharkhand=yes|politics-importance=Mid|jharkhand-importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Women}}

}}

{{old move|date=17 March 2025|destination=Annapurna Devi Yadav|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1282291048#Requested move 17 March 2025}}

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 17 March 2025

:The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. – robertsky (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:Annpurna Devi → {{no redirect|Annapurna Devi Yadav}} – name correction to avoid disambiguation with Annapurna Devi 103.185.174.206 (talk) 19:04, 10 March 2025 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). C F A 21:42, 17 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 14:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

  • Where's the evidence she's called Annapurna though? Sources do call her Annpurna [https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/union-minister-annapurna-devi-to-lead-indias-delegation-at-commission-on-status-of-women-at-united-nations/article69309403.ece]  — Amakuru (talk) 00:55, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  • :I think the annapurna vs annpurna is not the request. The request is to add the Yadav. Mistletoe-alert (talk) 01:23, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  • ::Sure, but if it's Annpurna and not Annapurna, then isn't it not ambiguous? Contesting anyway, this would appear to merit a discussion.  — Amakuru (talk) 00:06, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.