Talk:Antimicrobial resistance#Done some work on the lead - better image.3F
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Microbiology|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Molecular Biology|MCB=yes |MCB-importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Sanitation|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Evolutionary biology}}
}}
{{Merged-from|Origin of antibiotic resistance|12:59, 3 May 2012}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 2
|minthreadsleft = 4
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Antimicrobial resistance/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Archives|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=30}}
Wiki Education assignment: STS 1010
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Clemson_University/STS_1010_(Spring_2023) | assignments = Hagan2 | reviewers = Liviaamurphy444, Anpa9, Ctgibbo | start_date = 2023-01-11 | end_date = 2023-05-05 }}
— Assignment last updated by Jessicacariello (talk) 14:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: The Microbiology of College Life
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Cornell_University/The_Microbiology_of_College_Life_(Spring) | assignments = StephanVCornell | start_date = 2024-01-22 | end_date = 2024-05-11 }}
— Assignment last updated by Jason.DeLaCruz1313 (talk) 00:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Repeated reversion of thoroughly referenced edit
I have no idea what user:Bon courage finds to object to in either my edit or its references. The only hint of an objection is a mention of “usability” of “unreliable sources.” If they consider peer-reviewed articles published in Science Advances and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences to be unreliable, then I don’t know what psychic oracle can be trusted. And more to the point, if they do consider them unreliable, then it is for them to make that case.
I hope that some reasoned exchange can resolve this matter, since revert wars are pointless… and contrary to our cultural norms. If I see no reasonable reply to this query after some moderate waiting time, I will reluctantly revert their reversion of my reversion of their reversion.—PaulTanenbaum (talk) 18:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
:These are primary sources, no? Please see WP:MEDRS. Bon courage (talk) 18:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
::OK, I have added a secondary source.—PaulTanenbaum (talk) 18:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
:::Still not WP:MEDRS (a churned press release on phys.org is most unwelcome). You have been warned for edit-warring. Continue with this and a sanction will likely be necessary to protect the Project from further disruption. To get a wider view please raise a query at WT:MED for more input from experienced medical editors. Thanks. Bon courage (talk) 19:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)