Talk:Aon (company)#Requested move 17 March 2025
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Finance & Investment|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Companies|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Illinois|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject London|importance=Low}}
}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Aon (company)/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}
{{old move|date=17 March 2025|destination=Aon plc|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1281271667#Requested move 17 March 2025}}
Update to Aon descriptor in article
Hi there, I've adjusted the description of Aon as a "global professional services firm" in the article description and provided a source. If anyone has any further concerns, please feel free to contact me here or on my Talk page. Thank you Jane for Gregory C. Case (talk) 19:36, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
9/11
Requested move 17 March 2025
:The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 15:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
----
:Aon (company) → {{no redirect|Aon plc}} – WP:CONCISE "plc" is enough to distinguish it from other articles and no other companies with the name, "Aon," have their own articles. WiinterU 07:35, 11 March 2025 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). C F A 21:37, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- This is is standard disambiguation rather than using legal suffixes. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:47, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Actually both methods are acceptable per WP:NCCORP#Disambiguation, but I would agree that it should go through a full discussion to change the title from the "(company)" parenthetical disambiguation to the legal suffix. In similar previous RM discussions I have seen, it has frequently depended on whether the legal suffix is included in its WP:COMMONAME used by most reliable sources, and using "(company)" is instead generally preferred when reliable sources rarely use the legal suffix. Zzyzx11 (talk) 19:13, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. The current disambiguator is far more common and the legal suffix is not part of the company's common name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:45, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I am going to agree with Zzyzx11. Both pratices have merit on Wikipedia, an example would be Apple Inc. The discussion should be whether plc is WP:COMMONAME enough to be included for WP:NATURALDIS. Edit: however, I agree with Necrothesp as it does not seem to be part of the common name. cookie monster 755 10:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)