Talk:Arbor Networks

The claim that 70% of all ISPs use software from Arbor is made by the company itself! There is no reference to an independent study on this issue. Furthermore, the affirmation is ambiguous: is 70% referring to the a) total number of ISPs, b) persons covered by (connected through) the said ISPs, or c) available bandwidth / bytes transferred in the network by the said ISPs? – Daniel Mahu (talk|contribs) · 17:16, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on Arbor Networks. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=744730012 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090418160202/http://www.networkworld.com:80/news/2009/031009-arbor-networks-internet-monitoring.html?hpg1=bn to http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/031009-arbor-networks-internet-monitoring.html?hpg1=bn
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130923084424/https://www.packetloop.com/ to https://www.packetloop.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

I find it weird that the Netscout page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetScout_Systems) mentions their acquisition of Arbor Networks and proudly mentions "their" ATLAS monitoring system, yet the Arbor Networks page (this) says nothing... Most likely the Arbor Networks page should be merged into the new parent company or at least this page should mention their being sold to Netscout. 65.102.37.82 (talk) 03:06, 9 September 2022 (UTC)