Talk:Art game#mentions
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Video games|class=C|importance=mid|Indie=yes}}
{{WikiProject Arts}}
{{WikiProject Contemporary Art}}
{{WikiProject Visual arts}}
}}
{{Copied|from=Art game|from_oldid=933824036|to=List of art games|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Art_game&diff=934873002&oldid=933824036}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
| age=2160
| archiveprefix=Talk:Art game/Archives/
| minkeepthreads=4
| minarchthreads=3
| format=%%i
}}
High Art??
is it correct to call them as such?because the therm arthouse it kinda of implies that those games are high art,but a lot of people don't even consider games as such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.65.154.90 (talk) 03:13, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Art game. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=789801340 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130420092835/http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/dac/papers/Holmes.pdf to http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/dac/papers/Holmes.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120729233530/http://gamepolitics.com/2007/01/06/more-details-reaction-emerge-on-slamdance-festival-super-columbine-game to http://www.gamepolitics.com/2007/01/06/more-details-reaction-emerge-on-slamdance-festival-super-columbine-game
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120319150605/http://insider.ign.com/articles/875/875782p1.html to http://insider.ign.com/articles/875/875782p1.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100721065048/http://xboxlive.ign.com/articles/110/1106885p1.html to http://xboxlive.ign.com/articles/110/1106885p1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Suggestions for Examples
Would Oxenfree and The Beginners Guide apply to this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.102.180.134 (talk) 22:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
:That depends on whether you can find any support for their inclusion in the form of reliable sources explicitly describing the games as "art games" or "arthouse games". Otherwise, it might be a better idea to add them with appropriate sourcing to this similar list. -Thibbs (talk) 12:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Art game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141029074320/http://podcast.cbc.ca/spark/plus-spark_20101107_spark126c.mp3 to http://podcast.cbc.ca/spark/plus-spark_20101107_spark126c.mp3
- Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0326417/game_mods/game_mods.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.oxm.co.uk/45722/xbox-live-indie-uprising-sententia-is-an-art-game-with-a-heart/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Proposal: Move/remove list
I think it would be best to shift the "List of art games" section to its own article just like we did with the list at Video games as an art form. The list is rather long and tends to bloat the article, and it was just tagged as excessively "intricate detail" and "too long to read and navigate comfortably". Shifting the list to its own article should narrow down the article to just the meat of the topic. It should be fairly easy to accomplish just like last time. Are there any objections? -Thibbs (talk) 22:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- Strongly support This article has big problems (bloated, 100K length, on the edge of original research and so on). Spinning off the list will help enormously. Good idea. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:44, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
{{tick|10}} Seeing no objections, I've implemented the move. -Thibbs (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
:I've added the appropriate talk tags for history tracking purposes. --Masem (t) 00:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)