Talk:Astronomical unit
{{British English}}
{{FailedGA|14:02, 10 April 2018 (UTC)|topic=Physics and astronomy|page=1}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Astronomy|importance=high|solar_system=yes|ss-importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Measurement|importance=High
| b1 = yes
| b2 = yes
| b3 = yes
| b4 = yes
| b5 = yes
| b6 = yes
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 50K
|counter = 3
|minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(365d)
|archive = Talk:Astronomical unit/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{archives|search=yes|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=365}}
Rounding errors, or contradicting sources
This article in #Development_of_unit_definition:
> 1 astronomical unit [..] ≈ 499.004783836 light-seconds
Same article, in the table at #Examples:
> Light-second [≈] 0.0019 [au]
I would expect that rounded value to be 0.002 or more, not less. 2A10:3781:11DB:1:1993:C326:C2A3:B78 (talk) 14:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
:I agree. Light-second expressed in au is 149,597,780,700 / 299,792,458 = 0.002003989. I made the change Jc3s5h (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
improved
The article mentions the improved measurement of the speed of light in 1983. The way I know it, is that the ability to measure time, or frequency, improved, but the ability to accurately measure distance did not. So, defining c increases the ability to measure distance. But also, defining c means that it is now measured infinitely accurately, by definition. Or, the other way to look at it, you can't measure the speed of light anymore. Gah4 (talk) 09:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Links to IAU publications
The IAU recently restructured its website, and PDF files of some publications are now made available on Google Drive, for example some resolutions referenced in the article. The original links to the files were removed.
Here is the link to the current page listing resolutions:
https://www.iau.org/Iau/Publications/List-of-Resolutions
The direct link to Resolution B2 adopted at IAU General Assembly 2012 is here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FBKjaswlP-rTs6z6V4WygXsbdHKVHYcP/view
The direct link cannot be included in the article because it will receive a tag "citing a blog or free web host" indicating a source that is not reliable. The workaround that can be used for now is to cite a link to an archived version of the publication instead.
See also https://www.iau.org/Iau/Iau/About/Archive.aspx?hkey=8e870620-d676-447e-b436-805189f20a99