Talk:Atoms in molecules

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|

}}

I will ask the admins to switch back the move because the links got messy. You cannot redirect to a redirected article V8rik 20:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Is this a bit parochial -- any danger someone completely unaware of gamut of quantum theory of valency might stumble on this and think it dealt with entire field? Should there be some mention that it is one specialized approach, with references to overall field of quantum chemistry?Michael P. Barnett (talk) 20:24, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

:I do not follow you, Michael. To me it reads quite clearly that it is about a specialised approach to quantum chemistry. It perhaps needs a reference to someone who criticises the Bader approach. It has certainly attracted some controversy.--Bduke (Discussion) 21:36, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Results

It is not a result of the AIM-Theory, that

"Two atoms are bonded if their atomic volumes share a common interatomic surface, ". It is much more an axiom. Somehow the article should be related to chemical bonding and or chemical bond theory. An important issue is, that the different models/theories of chemical bonds or bonding cannot be related with one another just like that. --141.201.116.238 (talk) 08:02, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on Atoms in molecules. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=745419412 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121219024315/http://www.qct.manchester.ac.uk:80/index.htm to http://www.qct.manchester.ac.uk/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)