Talk:Audio Video Standard

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Audio Video Standard. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=790114212 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131219035023/http://www.avs.org.cn/english/ to http://www.avs.org.cn/english
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040405112139/http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20020524S0091 to http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20020524S0091

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

I would like to ask about licensing.

I suppose there may be less issues like in the case of competitors (VVC - H266, or ECM - H267, MPEG5 - EVC enhanced profile, even AV1), because for licensing is responsible Chinese government or institution from Chinese state.

And Chinese state can theoretically give that licensing necessary gravity in terms of leverage that once made deal will not be challenged in court resulting in patent vying.

VVC - H266 (And therefore I suppose H267 - ECM, and prehaps MPEG5) try avoid patent vying by warranting stable price and making patent vying internal conflict among patent holders. (Although not all companies are part of 2 or even 4 patent pools).

I have also seen someone in internet astonishing that AVS3 phase2 video codec is copy in technological manner.

What he did not understood is that coping in technology is welcome, only patents licensing is important. And there were some serious voices that patent vying and licensing issue was big or even biggest hurdle in adoption of HEVC - H265.

What can be other issue is the heating of geopolitical conflict and accusation of using Chinese technology despite (I do not know exactly) that AVS3 phase 2 video codec could consist of patents outside of china. 95.193.148.23 (talk) 14:09, 31 January 2025 (UTC)