Talk:Authority (Law & Order: Special Victims Unit)/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Authority (Law & Order: Special Victims Unit)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Authority (Law & Order: Special Victims Unit)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 22:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

=Infobox and lead=

  • Add a comma after "April 29, 2008" per MOS:DATECOMMA.
  • Add a serial comma after "Milgram experiments".
  • "Milgram experiments" {{right arrow}} "Milgram experiment" (consistency with #Production)
  • Add a serial comma after "Grand Central Terminal".
  • "10pm" {{right arrow}} "10{{nbsp}}pm" (10{{nbsp}}pm) per MOS:TIME.
  • If you add a quote to the lead, you have to recite a source per WP:QUOTE.
  • Done all of the above. Removed the quote from the lead, as it was from a source long gone from the article. - JuneGloom07 Talk 03:32, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

=Plot=

  • "voice skills" {{right arrow}} "vocal skills"
  • Remove the comma after "his ankle".
  • Without the names in parentheses, this section is 416 words. Try to get it down to 400 per MOS:TVPLOT.
  • Done. Plot should be 400 exact now. - JuneGloom07 Talk 03:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

=Production=

  • "guest starring" {{right arrow}} "guest-starring" (both uses) {{done}}
  • Add a serial comma after "Milgram experiment". {{done}}
  • Also add a serial comma after Mo Rocca. {{done}}
  • Various references in this section are dead. I'll point them out but an archive or replacement needs to be found for each of them. {{done}}
  • Reference in the caption, which is also used in prose, is dead. {{done}}
  • The first reference in this section is dead. {{done}}
  • "and who faces serious repercussions" is not part of [https://www.today.com/id/wbna23698961#.U-_LdcVdWSo the quote].
  • Changed.
  • The current-live reference after "like to appear on the show" doesn't show any text.
  • Not quite sure what to do here. I can try contacting the site to get a fix. - JuneGloom07 Talk 03:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
  • In the reference after Homicide: Life on the Street, I don't think the use of "|quote=" is necessary since it's recited later on. {{done}}
  • Reference after "event" is also dead. {{done}}
  • Why is there a summary of the episode in this section? I would remove it. {{done}}
  • The reference after "pillow fight" (from Just Jared) is not reliable per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 266#Just Jared.
  • I had this particular source whitelisted at WT:WHITELIST and thus believe it can be used in the article. - JuneGloom07 Talk 03:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
  • With the archive not showing any content and the link not working anymore, the reference after "appeared as himself" is dead.
  • Long story short, I saved all the HighBeam articles offline and just archived this one using dropbox and archive.is. - JuneGloom07 Talk 18:15, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

=Reception=

  • Try lowering the use of quotes in this section with the help of WP:RECEPTION. {{done}}
  • Recite sources at the end of each quote per WP:QUOTE. {{done}}
  • The reference from The Radio Times is dead.
  • Updated.
  • Same issues for the references after "by Rook", "grand exit", and "unsung roles". {{done}}

=References=

  • Archive all archivable references (either manually or with [https://iabot.toolforge.org/index.php?page=runbotsingle this tool]). Keep in mind that references from The Futon Critic can only be archived with [https://archive.today/ archive.today].
  • Archived them manually, including FC. Also updated some urls. - JuneGloom07 Talk 03:07, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Instead of "(subscription required)", mark that reference with "|url-access=subscription". {{done}}
  • Most of my comments on references are in #Production above.
  • Mark references from Los Angeles Times with "|url-access=limited". {{done}}

=Progress=

class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; width:50em"
height=50|GA review
{{small|(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)}}
#It is reasonably well written.

  1. :a (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  3. :a (references): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
    b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
    c (OR): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
    d (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
  4. It is broad in its coverage.
  5. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
    b (focused): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
  6. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  7. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|Pass}}
  8. It is stable.
  9. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|Pass}}
  10. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  11. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
style="text-align:center;" |

Overall:

Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|Pass}}

height=30|15px · 15px · 15px · 15px

:While I am grateful for the pass (and review), it was a bit premature. I'm working on finishing the last of the points raised now. - JuneGloom07 Talk 18:02, 1 April 2021 (UTC)