Talk:Ayurveda#rfc C0DB9AC

{{Talk header}}

{{Notice|{{find}}}}

{{ArbComPseudoscience}}

{{Trolling}}

{{controversial}}

{{tmbox

|image=File:Commons-emblem-issue.svg

|text=WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES
The article Ayurveda is currently subject to discretionary sanctions authorized by active arbitration remedies (see WP:ARBPS). The current restrictions are:

• Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)
• This talk page has previously been semi-protected due to disruption. Comments made by non-confirmed editors during that period can be found at Talk:Ayurveda/Non-confirmed editor comments.

{{Collapse|1=

Enforcement procedures:

• Editors who violate these restrictions may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

• Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
• Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
• Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.

Discretionary sanctions can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Discretionary sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

|2=Remedy instructions and exemptions

|bg=#EEE8AA}}

}}

{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ipa|brief}}

{{Canvass warning|short=yes}}

{{connected contributor|User1=Editswikifornepali|U1-EH=yes|U1-declared=yes|User2=Arunjithp |U2-EH=yes |U2-declared=yes}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Alternative medicine}}

{{WikiProject Alternative Views|importance=Top}}

{{WikiProject Dietary Supplements|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Hinduism|importance =high}}

{{WikiProject India|importance=high|past-collaboration=week of 3 July 2006}}

{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Religion|importance=high}}

{{WikiProject Skepticism|importance=Top|attention=yes}}

}}

{{Reliable sources for medical articles}}

{{Other banners|collapsed=yes|

{{Press

| subject = article

| author =

| title = Plea Seeks Removal Of 'Defamatory Content' On Ayurveda From Wikipedia

| org = NDTV

| url = https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/plea-seeks-removal-of-defamatory-content-on-ayurveda-from-wikipedia-2950295

| date = 6 May 2022

| quote = "The contents of the matter shown on Wikipedia totally malign the natural system of medicine which has a history of more than 3,000 years and is widely respected and accepted the world over, " the petitioner said, pointing out the fact that the incumbent Government of India has also constituted a separate Ministry named AYUSH for Ayurveda and other alternative medicine systems. The petition further stated that the Constitution of a separate ministry is an acknowledgment of this ancient stream of medicine, the petition said.

| subject2 = article

| author2 =

| title2 = "You Can Edit Wikipedia Articles" : Supreme Court Refuses To Entertain Plea Against Wikipedia Articles Allegedly Defaming Ayurveda

| org2 = Live Law

| url2 = https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/you-can-edit-wikipedia-articles-supreme-court-refuses-to-entertain-plea-against-wikipedia-articles-allegedly-defaming-ayurveda-212241

| date2 = 21 October 2022

| quote2 = "The petition referred to the article published on Wikipedia termed Ayurveda as a pseudoscientific and stated that the article written on Wikipedia was unnecessary and written purely with the intent to tarnish Ayurveda. "The matter of concern is that this is utterly absurd, poorly researched and prejudiced article pops up as the first article when Ayurveda is searched on Google", the petition said

| subject3 = article

| author3 =

| title3 = SC Refuses to Entertain PIL Against Wikipedia Entry Describing Ayurveda as 'Pseudoscientific'

| org3 = The Wire (India)

| url3 = https://m.thewire.in/article/law/sc-refuses-to-entertain-ayurveda-pil/amp

| date3 = 21 October 2022

| quote3 = The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) submitted that the Wikipedia entry described Ayurveda as “pseudoscientific” and, calling the article unnecessary, alleged that it had been written with the sole intention of tarnishing the image of Ayurveda.

| subject4 = article

| author4 = Catherine Davison

| title4 = Modi wants to export traditional Indian medicine to the world, but doctors warn against pseudoscience and quack cures

| org4 = Coda Media

| url4 = https://www.codastory.com/waronscience/india-traditional-medicine/

| date4 = 4 November 2022

| quote4 = The second sentence in the Wikipedia entry for Ayurveda declares that the “theory and practice of Ayurveda is pseudoscientific.”}}

{{mergedfrom|Panchakarma}}

{{mergedfrom|Ama (ayurveda)|date=17 November 2018}}

{{Old peer review|archive=1}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}

|maxarchivesize = 150K

|counter = 22

|minthreadsleft = 0

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(120d)

|archive = Talk:Ayurveda/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

|target=/Archive index

|mask=/Archive <#>

|leading_zeros=0

|indexhere=yes

}}

__TOC__