Talk:BMC Control-M

This redirect should be deleted because it is appearing in Google results for phrase "Control-M" but the redirect target page has no content about the subject. Wattssw (talk) 22:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

The BMC Control-M page was successfully removed using Proposed Deletion. It has since been reinstated for no given reason. I will now be using the Articles for Deletion method for proposing deletion Wattssw (talk) 12:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

This article reads like it was written for or copied from advertising. --72.12.218.72 (talk) 14:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

• Most of this article was written by BMC customers (such as myself) who enjoy talking about how much we enjoy the product and want to share information with others. -- Robertstinnett (talk) 03:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
• still - it shoul'd 'read' as an encyclopedia article, not marketing material. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.219.233.199 (talk) 09:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• I agree that some parts (especially the "Agentless Job Scheduling" section) read as advertising. You can simply mention/describe the features without resorting to marketing jargon to make them look sensational. Apapadop (talk) 16:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

No way control-m can be enjoyed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.80.164.36 (talk) 08:57, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

The links referring to the Gartner Reports are no longer valid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.134.183.208 (talk) 17:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

I agree that this reads like advertising copy - curious why it hasn't been flagged as such by the normally-vigilant Wiki Admins? 142.205.241.254 (talk) 18:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

The link 'BMC Control-M Info and Documents' (http://www.learn-ctm.com/) doesn't work.Hilfsarbeiter (talk) 15:47, 17 January 2015 (UTC)