Login
Login

Talk:Battle of Chawinda

{{Talk header|search=yes}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=

{{WikiProject India|importance=high|history=yes|history-importance=mid|assess-date=May 2012}}

{{WikiProject Pakistan |auto=yes|importance=mid|History=yes}}

{{WikiProject Military history|Indian-task-force=yes

|Pakistani-task-force=yes

|class=C

|B-Class-1= yes

|B-Class-2= yes

|B-Class-3= no

|B-Class-4= yes

|B-Class-5= no

}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 100K

|counter = 3

|minthreadsleft = 3

|algo = old(360d)

|archive = Talk:Battle of Chawinda/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes

}}

RFC on the Result - Pakistani Victory/Indian defeat

{{atop|RfC started by a ban evading sock, closing it per WP:DENY. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 20:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)}}

As already mentioned, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Battle_of_Chawinda/Archive_1#DID_the_battle_lead_to_Major_Pakistani_victory? an RFC concluded] that it was a Pakistani Victory. The decision was further reviewed and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=644921474#Reviewing_RfC_closure_:_Battle_of_Chawinda consensus] was once again in favor of the RFC - Pakistani Victory.

The participants of this short talk page discussion concluded the battle was inconclusive.

Should the result of the Battle of Chawinda be "Pakistani Victory" or "Indian defeat"? Joooshhh (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  • Pakistani Victory It's cut and dry - as the reliable sources state - the Indians failed to attack, the Pakistanis successful defended themselves. Joooshhh (talk) 19:58, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Close RfC This seems ridiculous to make an RfC after a block evading IP created one a few weeks prior and now an account with 17 edits on a page that is ECP? This does not seem like the correct protocol. – The Grid (talk) 22:12, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

{{abottom}}

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 December 2023

{{Edit extended-protected|Battle of Chawinda|answered=yes}}

Please add the following sections

==Other 1971 battles in the vicinity==

== See also ==

Thank you.

119.74.238.54 (talk) 03:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

:File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.  Spintendo  04:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 June 2024

{{edit extended-protected|Battle of Chawinda|answered=yes}}

Please add the following item in the "See also" section:

{{Mostly done}}, put it in the further reading section instead.

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 02:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

:{{U|Kingsmasher678}}, the navbox and sidebar already have these battles. Consequently, the addition of these to either further reading or see also is redundant. The added links are also mentioned in the article text. Cinderella157 (talk) 03:27, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

::Thanks, good catch. I'm trying to work through the old edit requests, and this one had been on the books a good while. I'll self revert.

::Kingsmasher678 (talk) 03:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Pakistani claims

Is i can add Ministry of information and broadcasting (government of Pakistan) claims in Pakistan claim portion about losses?[https://www.moib.gov.pk/News/56277#:~:text=Government%20of%20Pakistan&text=The%20valiant%20Pakistan%20Army%2C%20with,the%20motherland%20in%20September%2C%201965] Comsats777 (talk) 06:24, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Per WP:VNOT 600 tanks lost out of a bit more than 155 is ridiculous. Cinderella157 (talk) 07:08, 1 April 2025 (UTC)