Talk:Benjamin scale

{{Old AfD multi|page=Benjamin scale|date=5 September 2012|result=keep}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|

{{WikiProject LGBT studies}}

{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|importance=mid}}

}}

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.genderpsychology.org/transsexual/benjamin_gd.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Banned editor BenjiBoi

I'm cleaning up after the mess made by BenjiBoi. It looks like one of his socks made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benjamin_scale&diff=510979475&oldid=510978669 this revert]. I was going to undo this, but since I noticed that this article has editors involved in ongoing disputes I'm going to ask here before touching this one.  little green rosetta{{SubSup||central scrutinizer|(talk)}} 18:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

:I too am uncomfortable doing or saying much until after the relevant ArbCom case is completed, but I think my opinion is pretty clear already: All the content is much more appropriate to transsexuality typology pages, IMO, so would be better as a redirect to that.— James Cantor (talk) 21:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)