Talk:Beograd-class destroyer

{{ArticleHistory

| action1 = GAN

| action1date = 02:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

| action1link = Talk:Beograd-class destroyer/GA1

| action1result = listed

| action1oldid = 749768822

| action2=WAR

| action2date=16:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

| action2link=Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Beograd-class destroyer

| action2result=approved

| action2oldid=763611015

|action3=GTC

|action3date=03:56, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Royal Yugoslav Navy/archive1

|action3result=promoted

|ftname=Ships of the Royal Yugoslav Navy

| currentstatus=FA

| topic = Warfare

|action4=FAC

|action4date=2017-07-25

|action4link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Beograd-class destroyer/archive1

|action4result=promoted

|action4oldid=791236814

|maindate=November 20, 2017

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|1=

{{WikiProject Military history|class=FA|A-Class=pass|Maritime=yes|WWII=yes}}

{{WikiProject Serbia|Belgrade=y|importance=Mid|Belgrade-importance=high}}

}}

Or?

The article's description of the service of these chips contains a number of unexplained "or" statements about them, particularly their fates (e.g., "either damaged by artillery fire on 30 April 1945 at Trieste then scuttled, or just scuttled on 1 May"). If there is controversy or uncertainty, the article should say so, right where the "or" statements are, and preferably with a discussion of how the uncertainty arises, and possibly a mention of which seems most likely. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 20:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)