Talk:Bini (group)/Archive 1#LionhearTV as a reliable source

{{Automatic archive navigator}}

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (the page was created by user ArriehM, not by blocked user/sock-puppet Philippinesfan. Also, the page was edited/improved substantially by ArriehM and yours truly since its creation, with reliable citations added. Since then the mentioned sock-puppet has not added significant contributions to this page that may compromise its legitimacy. Please reconsider this.) --SenyorOtter (talk) 12:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... The page was not created by Philippinesfan. It was created by me. Waykurat nominates it for deletion because it was created by sock puppet account which is Philippinesfan. Please fix this issue. --ArriehM (talk) 11:57, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

You should investigate it first before you nominates it Username:WayKurat. ArriehM (talk) 12:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, Waykurat’s claim is evidently unsubstantiated. ArriehM is the page creator. Please fix this. SenyorOtter (talk) 12:09, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Spotify list

@AstrooKai. need to clarify. Didn't they previously top the list on April 18, making the first Filipino distinction proper on that date and not June? Borgenland (talk) 08:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

:Hello, @Borgenland. Yes, they previously topped a list on April 18, but that was for Spotify's [https://charts.spotify.com/charts/view/regional-ph-daily/2024-04-18 Daily Top Songs Philippines] chart. The recent event of them topping in a Spotify chart was for the Daily Top Artists Philippines chart, where they surpassed Taylor Swift on [https://charts.spotify.com/charts/view/artist-ph-daily/2024-06-14 June 14]. AstrooKai. (talk) 08:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

::Point taken. Thanks for the clarification. Borgenland (talk) 08:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

:::Happy to help. AstrooKai. (talk) 09:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Other ventures expansion

Hi, I'm AstrooKai. I have expanded the "Endorsements" subsection to provide more details about each of Bini's endorsements, see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bini_(group)&diff=1230400421 this] for the differences between the previous and the expanded version. Here's a summary table of the expansion:

class="wikitable"

!Expanded

!Excluded

Maybelline

|Coca-Cola

Modess

|Keds

Super Crunch

|Globe Telecom

Samsung

|Pond's

Puregold

|Bioderm

Shopee

|

Jollibee

|

Five were excluded, as there was not enough available information available from reliable sources. The Coca-Cola event was excluded as it doesn't fall under "endorsement," rather it falls under the category of collaboration. As a result, a new subsection called "Collaborations" was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bini_(group)&diff=1230401695 introduced] to accommodate these events. Should the notability of these collaborations be not enough for their inclusivity in the article, its removal can be discussed here.

The expansion may contain some errors, so feel free to fix them. If there are any concerns regarding the expansion, feel free to drop them here. Thank you. AstrooKai (talk) 14:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 17 June 2024

:The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 17:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

----

:Bini (group) → {{no redirect|BINI (group)}} – Borgenland (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Polyamorph (talk) 17:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Every RS is referring to them in uppercase. Borgenland (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

  • Strongly oppose per MOS:TRADEMARK. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 16:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Oppose as per 98Tigerius; Spam (food) is not at SPAM. Howard the Duck (talk) 16:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Oppose as per Wikipedia's policy on trademarks, as cited by 98Tigerius. While the group uses all caps in their branding, Wikipedia's conventions generally favor sentence cases for article titles on conditions like this. Similar cases exist where the trademark of a group is stylized in all caps, but not here on Wikipedia. Consider Blackpink, Got7, and Seventeen as examples. Normally, these are stylized as BLACKPINK, GOT7, and SEVENTEEN, respectively, but not here. AstrooKai (talk) 17:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

::I'd like to clarify then, does trademark take precedence over usage in RS and secondary sources (at least in this case)? Borgenland (talk) 02:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

:::I'm unfortunately not sure about that one. The general rules of MOS:TRADEMARK says that standard English text formatting and capitalization must be followed, regardless of the formatting commonly used by trademark owners. Although, there are some exceptions where the trademark is stylized the same way as from reliable sources.

:::{{Quote|Exceptions may apply, but Wikipedia relies on sources to determine when an unusual name format has become conventional for a particular trademark; only names that are consistently styled a particular way by a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are styled that way in Wikipedia.|source=MOS:TRADEMARK}}

:::Perhaps, this exception clause can be placed into consideration. AstrooKai (talk) 07:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

::::For reference, I did run through every major newspaper and the big 3 television networks in the country, plus Rappler, after which I felt a move could be justified. Borgenland (talk) 08:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

:::::That may be a good point. However, in the examples I mentioned, they are also often referred to with their group name in all caps in many sources, yet they are not stylized in that manner here on Wikipedia. AstrooKai (talk) 18:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

:MOS:TRADEMARK itself makes it clear that {{tq|[W]hen deciding how to format a trademark, editors should examine styles already in use by independent reliable sources.}} "BINI" being common usage in reliable sources (excluding ABS-CBN, as they are not independent from the subject) means it should be the article title in use here per policy. We follow what sources say — if they also don't capitalize, we're in the right; if they don't, we're in the wrong. Taking a cursory look at how reliable sources call the band, the capitalized version is in most common use; we should move the page as a matter of policy. Chlod (say hi!) 10:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

::As several have pointed out above, "most common" is not the criterion for style choices, and never has been. Dicklyon (talk) 19:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

:Relisting comment: Relisting to allow more time for consensus to develop Polyamorph (talk) 17:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

  • Oppose. Per MOS:ALLCAPS, "Avoid writing with all caps (...) when they have only a stylistic function." That's all this is, a stylism. 162 etc. (talk) 18:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Oppose per WP:TITLETM / MOS:ALLCAPS. The recent mood on Wikipedia is to strongly avoid all-caps. Per Dicklyon, this is the case even when all-caps seems the most common form. This title is not an initialism or even a backronym. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Oppose per above. HueMan1 (talk) 01:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Chronological fix

Inviting editors engaged in this subject to find ways on how to make the history section less of a WP:NEWSPAPER, especially since the formula tends to be repetitive announcements of an upcoming event followed by the actual event, which is kind of confusing especially if an unrelated event happens in between like the announcement of the Biniverse concert date in April followed by their packed schedule before the actual concert. Borgenland (talk) 16:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

:Does this apply to the entire history timeline? Or specific timespans only? AstrooKai (talk) 05:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

::So far it sticks out in 2024 and in the debut. Tho I made some reductions in debut a few weeks before. Borgenland (talk) 07:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

:::Okay, I'll see what I can do. AstrooKaiTalk 07:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

:I have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bini_(group)&oldid=1233128766 revised] the 2023–present subsection for readability and narrative flow. It is also an attempt to address this issue. If you notice any other copyedit issues that I have overlooked or unnoticed, feel free to fix them. AstrooKaiTalk 12:37, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

::Currently making minor edits. I am now exploring the possibility of splitting the Biniverse concert into a separate chapter to segregate the in-betweens (Chinese TV, Independence Day and Bini Run). Borgenland (talk) 15:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

:::Made the fix just now. My suggestion for now is that references referring to upcoming events be replaced or merged once these performances/events have taken place to avoid overcite. Borgenland (talk) 15:37, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

:::Okay, but would it be more appropriate to place the 2024—Solo concerts as a sub-subsection of the 2023–present subsection? Logically, the newly added section still falls within the 2023–present timeframe. AstrooKaiTalk 15:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

::::Fair enough. Suggest removing the 2024 part to avoid confusion in editing. As for the title should it be formally called the Biniverse for the sake of precision? Borgenland (talk) 16:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Biniverse regional leg

Hello! It has come to my mind about the regional leg of the Biniverse: The First Solo Concert. Since the NFT concert is listed under the headlining concerts, would it be also appropriate to have the regional leg listed under it? Or possibly other subsection (e.g. concert tours)? AstrooKaiTalk 14:21, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

:It is indeed a headline event. An explanatory note can do. Borgenland (talk) 14:26, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

::Would it be more appropriate to list them as individual items in the table? Since it would be too lengthy to be an explanatory note since the events will be held on different place at different times. AstrooKaiTalk 15:36, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

:::suggest putting them in the list then place a footnote next to the reference. Borgenland (talk) 15:41, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

::::And how would the concert tour will be called? AstrooKaiTalk 15:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

:::::Suggest putting a (regional leg) at the end of the event title. Borgenland (talk) 15:45, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

::::::And (international) for the overseas ones, all under Biniverse. Borgenland (talk) 15:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

:::::::Something like this? "Biniverse: The First Solo Concert (Regional)" "Biniverse: The First Solo Concert (International)" AstrooKaiTalk 15:52, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

::::::::+leg/tour). Borgenland (talk) 15:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Italicization of Star Hunt Academy

Hello! I've noticed that the name "Star Hunt Academy" is italicized in this section's heading, but not within the rest of the article. Should the name be consistently italicized throughout?

I wanted to ask because I'm not entirely sure whether it qualifies for italicization under Wikipedia's guidelines. Could anyone clarify if "Star Hunt Academy" should be treated as a title of a major work, which would typically warrant italicization? AstrooKaiTalk 12:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

:What I’m confused about is whether the TV program was called SHA or just SH? Borgenland (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

::Okay, so I just watched some of the episodes online and here's what I learned.

::Star Hunt is the designation for ABS-CBN's nationwide auditions program, aiming to search and develop new talents for various entertainment fields (acting, singing, dancing, etc.). Star Hunt Academy is the branch of this program, dedicated to vocal and dance training, to form idol groups, which is now known as BINI and BGYO.

::So it seems then that "Star Hunt Academy" is also the name of the show. Though it wasn't aired on any television channels, only on Star Hunt's YouTube channel. While this was the case, I guess it can still be considered a show which warrants italicization per Manual of Style. AstrooKaiTalk 17:46, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

:::I remember seeing snippets of the show in the afternoons as a bus commuter though. I think it was around 4 or 5 PM on ABS-CBN and was coupled with brief updates from PBB. Borgenland (talk) 00:28, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

::::I see. Anyway, do you think these constitutes for the name to be italicized consistently throughout the article? AstrooKaiTalk 05:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

:::::Yes. And better to use the acronym for succeeding mentions to save space. Borgenland (talk) 12:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

::::::Alright, will do it now. Thank you. AstrooKaiTalk 12:54, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

::::::Also, does the acronymn gets italicized too? AstrooKaiTalk 12:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

:::::::As far as I'm concerned yes. Borgenland (talk) 12:57, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

::::::::Published the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bini_(group)&oldid=1238353551 edit]. I left some of its mentions in full form as I see them fit in the context of the paragraph, feel free to change this if otherwise. AstrooKaiTalk 13:07, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Rexona

Need independent refs for the recent Rexona ad. Borgenland (talk) Borgenland (talk) 14:15, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

:Hi, @Borgenland! I noticed you have posted this same request on Talk:Bini discography and Talk:Bini videography, but I will reply here since responding on both talk pages would be excessive. To answer your request, there are currently no available independent reliable sources since the advertisement is too recent to get media coverage.

:It is unlikely that other news outlets besides ABS-CBN News will cover the advertisement since it does not appear notable. Since it is only a promotion for a cosmetic brand. AstrooKaiTalk 14:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

::No worries, I'm still remembering the previous notes on the members. Borgenland (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

References about Bini's fandom name

The references in the article's Fandom section must be replaced with new references (preferably those published by news agencies) as they are primary sources and user-generated content. The source, particularly the Facebook live stream, cannot be archived properly since Facebook's robots.txt generally prohibits bot crawlers from accessing the website and the fact that the stream is one hour long (evident in existing archives of the URL where the page is not properly archived), causing the likelihood for it to become deprecated in the future. AstrooKaiTalk 08:48, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

:Also suggest moving it further down the article on grounds of WP:DUE. Borgenland (talk) 10:12, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

:Just added a GMA ref. The section may need to be pruned tho to remove unsupported content. Borgenland (talk) 10:15, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

::There is no need for the section to be trimmed as the reference states almost the exact same content of the section. I will just do a minor trim and copyedit on it and remove the UGC references. AstrooKaiTalk 10:48, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Bini Official Greetings

Hello!

I’m planning to add official greetings of bini in this article, is it okay to add that? Royiswariii (talk) 02:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

:Can you explain what kind of official greetings or content it would be? AstrooKaiTalk 02:55, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

::I do some little research and they always greet "2. 3! Mabuhay! We are, BINI!" and they mentioned their greetings in KCON LA 2024 after they performed Cherry on Top. Royiswariii (talk) 11:28, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

:Please read about WP:NOTEVERYTHING and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 12:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion of moving concerts section

Since the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bini_(group)&oldid=1233543781 recent change], the concerts section has grown considerably. Would it be worth moving it to a new article dedicated to the group's live performances? AstrooKaiTalk 17:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

:For perspective, both SB19 and BGYO have dedicated live performances articles. Borgenland (talk) 17:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

:This section is too much WP:FANCRUFT. I suggest to only retain the headlining and joint concerts subsection while the rest should be a prose at the history section. Please do note WP:OTHERCONTENT. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 04:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

::If no one opposes, I will removed it myself in a couple of days. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 12:02, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

::I wanted to know what other interested editors thought about the suggestion of moving the section's content to a stand-alone list for the group's live performances and appearances as it seems to be too long for it to be included in the main article, similar to the SB19's FL page, List of SB19 live performances. Although, I am not sure if the creation of the list would be considered WP:LISTCRUFT or trigger other policies, since I am still not familiar with the other policies. I would appreciate any feedback or guidance on this. AstrooKaiTalk 12:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

:::Support the list. Borgenland (talk) 13:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

:::I also support to have it a stand-alone list. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 14:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

:::I have created the list, see it at List of Bini live performances. The dates of the references were converted automatically from other formats to mdy, there may be some errors on them so feel free to fix them. Also, feel free to hunt down for errors I have overlooked in the article and fix them. I guess the Bini (group)#Concerts section can be now trimmed down as a result of this split. If you have any questions or opinion about the list, please let me know. Thanks! AstrooKaiTalk 16:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

LionhearTV as a reliable source

@Royiswariii recently raised concerns regarding the reliability of [https://www.lionheartv.net/ LionhearTV]. This article currently relies on three cited source from LionhearTV (previously four), which needs to be addressed according to them. I have replaced one source with a reference to a press release by ABS-CBN Newsroom as LionhearTV's article was a complete copypaste from the said press release. See this diff for the revision. Other Bini-related articles also rely to this source.

Nevertheless, I'm opening this topic to gather feedback from interested editors whether to raise this concern to WP:RSN to further discuss its reliability as a source since 688 Philippine articles (based on a Wikipedia search query that returned 688 article entries) are also relying to LionhearTV. AstrooKai (TalkContributions) 15:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

:I've been a bit wary of the site since as far as I can remember, its connection to ABS-CBN is not that clearly defined, as compared to PEP and its relationship with GMA network (which explains why I am more comfortable with using it here and some related articles). Borgenland (talk) 15:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

::According to their own about page, LionhearTV was established in 2008 as an independent entertainment blog, though I don't know if they're a "news blog" (which may pass WP:RS and WP:NEWSBLOG) or a "personal blog" (which fails WP:UGC). This is why I'm planning to raise this to WP:RSN to generate consensus regarding its reliability, or at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Sources, if its more appropriate there since the source is a Philippine website. AstrooKai (TalkContributions) 16:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|AstrooKai}}! I gathered some research on the AfD regarding LionhearTV being considered an unreliable source. They aren't accepting it as reliable. I came across a draft article (Draft:My Mother, My Story) where a review by SafariScribe (mentioned that they reviewed my article too on Maloi and wasn't approved, possibly due to sources like LionhearTV). I based it on their feedback and flagged it as an unreliable source. Royiswariii (talk) 19:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

::This is a statement from one editor, we need to generate a consensus from other editors on whether the source is, as SafarScribe mentioned, an unreliable source. Because I'm currently stuck between whether LionhearTV is a news blog or a personal blog, since news blogs are sometimes considered a reliable source, depending on how the article was written (see WP:NEWSBLOG). I will have this raised to WP:RSN to have a centralized discussion for it, since there are hundreds of Philippine articles using LionhearTV as a reference at some point. AstrooKai (TalkContributions) 10:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

:See parallel discussion at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines. Borgenland (talk) 04:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

::Please note that this issue has been raised to WP:RSN, feel free to drop feedback there if there is any. AstrooKai (TalkContributions) 19:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hello!

I just want to let you know all that I nom to Peer Review. Royiswariii Talk! 15:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

:Alright. Let us know if you need any assistance. AstrooKai (Talk) 15:52, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Awit 2024

Apparently, a confusing set of categories were inserted at the last minute which may visually compromise the awards box and that of "Pantropiko" and "Karera". See [https://billboardphilippines.com/music/news/here-are-the-winners-for-the-37th-awit-awards-lola-amour-sb19-bini-2024/]. Borgenland (talk) 17:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

:If a consensus is reached on expanding the box in light of these developments, I would like to request additional help in doing so. Borgenland (talk) 16:04, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

:It's actually my first time hearing these categories on Awit Awards, and I'm not sure on how they will be added to the table since I'm not entirely sure on how to approach these since they were not included in the [https://billboardphilippines.com/music/news/sb19-bini-lola-amour-and-more-lead-awit-awards-2024-nominations-full-list/ final nominee lists] released months ago. AstrooKai (Talk) 17:33, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

::I sent a message on Music TF for comments from other editors. Borgenland (talk) 18:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

::Just WP:BOLD added it. Re-read again and there were People's Choice wins in 2023. Borgenland (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

:::Noted. I also want to let you know that I made some tweaks with the table, grouping the accolades for "Pantropiko" and "Karera" so that they're under one column span. AstrooKai (Talk) 16:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Most viewed Filipino music article of 2024

https://x.com/allchartsPH/status/1867866887994110032

If we get a reputable source for this, that'd be a real full-circle moment. Congrats, especially to Royiswariii, AstrooKai, and Borgenland! Bloomagiliw (talk) 11:50, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

:I saw this earlier, it's our a cheers to us {{u|AstrooKai}}, {{u|Borgenland}}, {{u|Acrom12}}, {{u|Bloomagiliw}}!

:Of course, I will credit to the major contributor here in this article AstrooKai ,Borgenland and Acrom12 (article creator), both of them are really helped to build this article, I'm just still quite a newbie here lol. Royiswariii Talk! 15:29, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

::I just want a throwback on [https://x.com/BINI_ph/status/1333300608774795265?t=Bm451qbcciytQsuzGNlMWg&s=19 Bini post] on X. I'm apologize if this is will be breaking the rules, But, I'm happy that they successful now. Like, Bini promote (idk if promoted or just they discovered) this Wikipedia article.

::P.S: I accidentally see this while I'm searching on X. Royiswariii Talk! 15:38, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

:Congratulations indeed, everyone. But let's not continue this further as it violates WP:NOTFORUM. Cheers, AstrooKai (Talk) 15:45, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

::Since there is no news outlet or other reliable sources that covers on Wikipedia that Bini are most popular article for a Filipino musician in Philippines 2024 with 1.4 Million views. We can cite the tweet post of All charts ph per WP:EXCEPTIONAL it says: {{tq|Challenged claims that are supported purely by primary or self-published sources or those with an apparent conflict of interest.}} Royiswariii Talk! 23:46, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

:::That's actually a red flag. That guideline states that:

:::{{bq|Any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality sources. Warnings (red flags) that should prompt extra caution include:

:::* Surprising or apparently important claims not covered by multiple mainstream sources;

:::* Challenged claims that are supported purely by primary or self-published sources or those with an apparent conflict of interest;

:::* Reports of a statement by someone that seems out of character or against an interest they had previously defended;

:::* Claims contradicted by the prevailing view within the relevant community or that would significantly alter mainstream assumptions—especially in science, medicine, history, politics, and biographies of living and recently dead people. This is especially true when proponents say there is a conspiracy to silence them.}}

:::In a nutshell, exceptional claims must be covered by reputable and reliable media outlets. Self-published sources may be considered, but is generally a red flag and should be approach with extra caution. However, I'm not sure if this recognition warrants inclusion per WP:DUE and other content policies or guidelines. I also don't see information like these being included on articles. AstrooKai (Talk) 00:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 29 January 2025

:The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

----

{{check talk wp}}

{{Tmbox

|small =

|imageright =

|image = 45px

|type = move

|text = It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

----

{{smallcaps|result:}}
The suggested moves are opposed by experienced editors with cogent arguments. Those arguing for these moves based their views mostly on pageviews, it seems, sidestepping content arguments and other ways to determine a primary topic. "Trainwreck" is perhaps too strong a word, but as {{U|Joy}}, {{U|Howard the Duck}}, and others argue, there is also a question of recentism here. In other words, not moved. Drmies (talk) 16:14, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

----

Move logs: [{{fullurl:Special:Log/move|page={{Urlencode:Bini (group)}}}} source title]{{·}} [{{fullurl:Special:Log/move|page={{Urlencode:Bini (group)}}}} target title]

This is template {{tls|Requested move/end}}

}}

– This following requested move pertains to a member of the Filipino girl group Bini (group). I believe that all these requested moves are passed on WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Please read the following explanations:

  • Bini (group)
  • Bini are passed on PRIMARYTOPIC because, the pageviews from January 1, 2024 until yesterday (January 28, 2025) nearly [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&start=2024-01-01&end=2025-01-28&pages=Bini_(group) 1.2 Million pageviews].
  • Gwen (singer)
  • Gwen is a member of Bini and she's have [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&start=2024-01-01&end=2025-01-28&pages=Gwen_(singer) 54, 140 pageviews].
  • Mikha (singer)
  • Mikha was also a member of Bini, she's have [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&start=2024-01-01&end=2025-01-28&pages=Mikha_(singer) 110, 715 pageviews] since the creation of the article. Not to be confused on Mika (singer).
  • Maloi (singer)
  • Maloi was also a memeber of Bini, her article have [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&start=2024-01-01&end=2025-01-28&pages=Maloi_(singer) 84, 562 pageviews] since the creation of the article. ROY is WAR Talk! 02:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

:Note: WikiProject Women in Music, WikiProject Southeast Asia, WikiProject Asia, WikiProject Pop music, Tambayan Philippines, WikiProject Musicians, and WikiProject Biography have been notified of this discussion. ROY is WAR Talk! 02:48, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

::Note: the :Maloi (singer) → {{no redirect|Maloi}} proposal had to be removed from this request because it conflicted with a proposal at Talk:Maloi (singer). P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 13:48, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Support Bini related moves and Maloi per notability. As for the members I am uncertain given commonality. Borgenland (talk) 04:14, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Oppose Gwen for the singer. The purpose of pageviews is to see how it compares with the other listings, and [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&range=all-time&pages=Gwen_(singer)|Gwen|Gwen_(film)|Tropical_Storm_Gwen, looking at more articles] and all time, instead of just the last year, this singer doesn't appear to be the primary topic. I would honestly suggest moving her to Gwen (Filipino singer) seeing as most people would probably thinking of Gwen Stefani as a more prominent singer with the name Gwen [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&range=all-time&pages=Gwen_(singer)|Gwen_Stefani].

:Support moving the group to Bini as [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&range=all-time&pages=Bini_(group)|Bini|Bini_(grape)|Bini_(surname)|Bini,_Burkina_Faso, all time page views for them] is clear enough. Also Support moves for Mikha and Maloi; Mihka redirects to Micah where there is no one (not even this person) listed there under the name, and there is no article for anything else under Maloi so I'd be happy for her to take that article space. orangesclub 🍊 03:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

  • I have decided to retract my support for Mikha, as honestly I don't think she (and most of these women) meet WP:BANDMEMBER and I expect conversations on that to come soon. Still support the Bini move, but none others. orangesclub 🍊 22:34, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :FWIW, I've put all members of the group up for WP:PROD late last year but was swiftly removed by the people who initiated this discussion. All members use the same references and made it appear that the members participated in activities on their own when a closer look at the sources show that they performed as a group (LOL). The only "unique" activities was maybe if someone was missing due to sickness or something else. Howard the Duck (talk) 01:21, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • ::Seriously? I'm really surprised that each members has already have their individual page when most of their citations are only passing mention, it really failed both WP:GNG and WP:SINGER. The members' pages should be nominate at WP:AfD. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 02:35, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :::@D.18th We already explained on the objection of the individual members as a standalone article.
  • :::* Aiah - Objection of Proposed Deletion
  • :::There is also have a WP:SIGCOV on the individual members like Billboard Philippines, Nylon Manila, Vogue Philippines, GMA News and ABS-CBN News (primary source).
  • :::On Mal oi, she appeared on the music video Dilaw (Yellow) by Maki. She is also have an solo magazine on Metro Magazine Philippines and the original Billboard as well as the rest of the others group too. ROY is WAR Talk! 03:01, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • ::::"She is also have an solo magazine on Metro Magazine Philippines". I can't understand this, and my apologies to foreigners if they can't as well (LOL).
  • ::::You mean to she appeared on a magazine cover by herself? Is that right? And that's your basis why she passes WP:GNG? Howard the Duck (talk) 05:13, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • ::I did see those, I think if we have a deletion discussion in line of WP:AFD where it can't just be removed, we'll probably get less biased interpretations of WP:GNG than what has been cited thus far. Honestly, Gwen literally only has a Big Brother credit and a non-charting soundtrack song to her name. I'm not super familiar with the process myself but the way I see it, it's pointless moving these people to the primary topics when it is likely they'll be deleted/redirected to Bini in the end anyway. orangesclub 🍊 05:43, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :::TBH none of the article names are suitable redirects. If these are to be sent for deletion, redirects should be out of the question, restoring the alternate spellings like Jhoanna and Aiah to the articles about the given names. Howard the Duck (talk) 07:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • ::::Oh I agree, which is why I don't really want Mikha (singer) to become Mikha, for the article to be deleted and the redirect becoming Mikha > Bini (because of this RM) instead of what should be Mikha (singer) > Bini and leaving it as Mikha > Micah. WP:APOS says to not list people without articles on lists for names, so it feels ridiculous for us to end up with a non-notable person taking up the redirect. Not sure this makes sense but either way I'm very sure you and I are on the same page on this. orangesclub 🍊 07:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Support Bini as the primary topic. Support Mikha, Maloi; unambiguous. Oppose Gwen, who is not the primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 04:28, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Support for Bini (indeed a WP:PTOPIC). Maloi, and Mikha (unambiguous) while oppose for Gwen as per above. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 05:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Support for Bini, Maloi, and Mikha. Oppose for Gwen. All are per above. AstrooKai (Talk) 06:03, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Oppose moving Gwen, the others seem to have no other significant competition for primary topic. olderwiser 12:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  • This sounds like peak WP:Recentism, but I don't want to be entirely prejudiced against it. Per WP:DPT, let's have a look at some stats.

: [https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Bini WikiNav for Bini] does show a large amount of interest. At the same time, it's not necessarily clear what the long-term significance situation is. [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&range=all-time&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bini All-time mass views for the base title] and [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&range=all-time&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bini for the surname] doesn't show a lot of reader interest in the other topics. It seems to be a fairly common Italian surname, and the Nigerian people are fairly prominent as well, though it's not clear how common the specific moniker Bini for the Edo really is. It would definitely improve the efficiency of navigation for these fans if we moved this, but I'm not sure if this would give the wrong impression to the average reader that this is a worldwide definition of what "Bini" primarily is. It's hard to be particularly bothered by the idea of inconveniencing hundreds of fans a month - they know what they're after, it's not actually hard for them to pick out their favorite item out of a short list.

: With regard to Gwen, [https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Gwen WikiNav for Gwen] and [https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Gwen_%28given_name%29 for the given name] actually show more people are being detected manually navigating to unlinked Gwen Stefani than there are looking for this other person, let alone all the other traffic there. This proposal is just plain nonsense.

: I don't have time right now to go over the rest, but I'm guessing there's also marginal value in doing this. It's safe to say that the long-term significance aspect of WP:PTOPIC wasn't considered here, and we're instead looking at the encyclopedia more from a fan point of view, which is misguided. (Oppose) --Joy (talk) 15:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

::I check on Wikinav of Bini, however, it seems the cover on Bini is "other empty" which is a questionable. I believe that this is will be Primary topic because of consistent and most searchable here on Wikipedia of searching "Bini". In Wikinav of Bini, it is obviously receives engagement other topics titled Bini. The Edo people that referred to as Bini are notable, though usage of this term as their primary identifier appears limited in modern contexts. Given the sustained interest and the lack of a clear alternative primary topic. A hatnote can ensure other meaning easily accessible. A redirect a Bini from Help:Disambiguation is a questionable too.

::On Gwen, I would agree that it doesn't need to move because of confusion. ROY is WAR Talk! 15:13, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

:::Just because there's a lack of a clear alternative primary topic, that doesn't mean we have to pick one. That's why the guideline asks - WP:D#Is there a primary topic? There have been many other cases where there's a pop-culture topic with significant readership, but we don't choose a primary topic. --Joy (talk) 16:08, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

::::I check carefully the Wikinav of Bini, I still don't understand on what's the "other empty" that using on the titled, "Bini". The disambiguation are automatically added as a wikilink on current Bini now, just like [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&range=all-time&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_(disambiguation) this on Apple (disambiguation)] and this on [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&range=all-time&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWE_Hall_of_Fame_(disambiguation) WWE Hall of Fame (disambiguation)]. The thing is still a considered as a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC to move "Bini (group)" to "Bini" and still a mystery for "other empty". ROY is WAR Talk! 13:52, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::The same other-empty category appears elsewhere, it refers to traffic for which there is no HTTP Referer header sent by the clients. I don't understand what you mean by the rest of that paragraph.

:::::Either way, I still don't see the real benefit to changing this, no further argument has been made that would prove that this is necessary recentism.

:::::On related note, after you've done that [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bini_(group)&oldid=1273235940 "procedural close"], I don't think there's much sense in continuing to discuss this, because that was gross violation of WP:Gaming the system. --Joy (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

::::::I already admitted on WP:ANI when I raised my concern that Howard accusations to me on Paid Editing. I'll leave it up to the WP:SYSOP since it was my mistake and a WP:AGF. ROY is WAR Talk! 12:13, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Are we really to believe that a a Filipino girl group known almost primarily in the Philippines is primary topic over a village in Burkina Faso, a language and a whole goddamned the ethnic group? Really?

:"Jhoanna", an alternate spelling of Joanna (given name), changed its subject since one of the members of Bini is named "Jhoanna". As per WP:POFR, that should not have been the case, but I was outvoted by Bini fans and their WP:PRIMARYTOPIC argument that people fell in line for. Now, "Mikha" is an alternate spelling of "Micah", and again, just like on the ill-fated RM that totally disregarded WP:POFR, it has to give way to a member of this girl group.

:Gwen has been opposed by pretty much everybody here save for the Bini fans, I won't have to elaborate on that.

:There's also a separate an ongoing RM for Maloi at Talk:Maloi (singer)#Requested move 27 January 2025 that people on this RM should know about. I don't think her "Maloi" (which came from "Mary Loi") is an alternate spelling of "Maloy", however Maloi can either be clan of an ethnic group or a village. A whole goddamned village.

:WP:AGF and all, but there's something nefarious about these RMs. {{u|Royiswariii}} User talk:Wikishovel#Conflict on "Jhoanna" and "Joanna" asked {{u|Wikishovel}} about the Jhoanna RM, arguing "it can be confusion on Google algorithms too especially there is a Google Knowledge Panel for Jhoanna Robles". Are you guys being paid? If not, ABS-CBN should pay you guys; work is not free. Also, how can we trust you guys you'd follow WP:NPOV? Google Knowledge Panels are absolutely none of our business, and we should name articles based on third party websites.

:As this stands, oppose all as proposed as per my explanation and as per {{u|Joy}}, support these moves:

:* Bini (group) stays there.

:* Gwen (singer) move to Gwen Apuli or "Bini Gwen" (this is the appellative Bini members go by these days, "Bini" ". Imagine "Blackpink Lisa"), or "Gwen (Filipino singer)".

:* Mikha (singer) move to Mikha Lim or "Bini Mikha".

: I'd comment about this on the Maloi RM, and while we cannot overtturn Jhoanna, or advocate reopening, I'd support for a similar naming convention for her in the future. Howard the Duck (talk) 23:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

::Hi Howard!

::Thanks for your input on this RM and for bringing up some points. However, I don’t think it’s necessary to say:

::{{bq|Are you guys being paid? If not, ABS-CBN should pay you guys; work is not free. Also, how can we trust you guys you'd follow WP:NPOV?}}

::While you mentioned "WP:AGF and all", this kind of statement really questions the good faith of those involved in the discussion, including myself. Accusing people of paid editing and doubting their neutrality without evidence doesn’t help the conversation. It's leaning toward WP:ASPERSIONS. If there are concerns about neutrality, it would be more helpful to point to specific sources or policy issues rather than casting doubt in a general way.

::Just to clarify, we're not paid editors. Yes, our contributions may focus more on Bini-related articles, but that doesn't mean we're getting paid. We simply have a greater interest in this area as we support Bini by contributing here on Wikipedia, all while acting in accordance with the guidelines. This is known as WP:STEWARDSHIP, and it does not violate any guidelines or policies here on Wikipedia.

::Lastly, I’d really appreciate it if you could tone it down a bit. Let’s try to keep things respectful so we can have a better dialogue. AstrooKai (Talk) 13:42, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

::Hi {{u|Howard the Duck|Howard}}!
First of all, I am not paid editor. Your accusations are not Good Faith and obviously WP:ASPERSIONS. Your vote might or might not consider this due to this accusations, but let's not talk about that. (I'll leave to page movers if will consider your vote with explanation and will be the result of this RM.){{quote|Now, "Mikha" is an alternate spelling of "Micah", and again, just like on the ill-fated RM that totally disregarded WP:POFR, it has to give way to a member of this girl group.}}If you see my evidences, it is obviously PRIMARYTOPIC, it will need a consensus again if you really want to move Mikha to Micah which is a given name and per Orangeclub "where there is no one (not even this person) listed there under the name."{{quote|Gwen (singer) move to Gwen Apuli or "Bini Gwen" (this is the appellative Bini members go by these days, "Bini" ". Imagine "Blackpink Lisa"), or "Gwen (Filipino singer)". }}

::*Agree that Gwen for Gwen (Filipino singer) But to Bini Gwen, technically no 'cause I did it on Maloi which is Maloi (Bini) 'cause it's *inappropriate and don't know what type is she.

::*On Mikha, I already created a redirect for Mikha Lim, to Bini Mikha it's just my explanation per Maloi. To "Blackpink Lisa" that you examplez I strongly disagree per WP:COMMONAME. I already explained my argument to Joy so you can check it out.

::ROY is WAR Talk! 15:40, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

: (Apparently, the stricken words offended someone; obviously, it was not a personal attack as it was never directed to any specific person, real or imagined, from within or without this discussion, but I have stricken it nonetheless. Howard the Duck (talk) 00:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC))

  • Procedural close. Sounds like a trainwreck to me. HueMan1 (talk) 16:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Oppose all ScarletViolet 13:14, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
  • :Because? Please read WP:ATADP#Arguments without arguments. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 14:47, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :Can you elaborate why did you oppose? It seems you don't have reason why did you oppose all of my nomination, this might be not considering your vote, please read WP:ATADP#Arguments without arguments. ROY is WAR Talk! 12:16, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Urgent notice: The initiator of this WP:RM, {{u|Royiswariii}}, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bini_(group)&oldid=1273235940 unilaterally closed this RM] despite this not qualifying for early closure (WP:RMEC), and most importantly, having conflict of interest in this said RM (WP:RMCLOSE#Conflicts of interest). Such appalling behavior! Good thing [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bini_(group)&oldid=1273244164 it was reverted] by {{u|Paper9oll}}, who then cleaned stuff up on the discussed articles to prevent further action by bots. Perhaps a topic ban is in order? LOL this is madness. Any further edits such as this would be reported to the appropriate drama board. Howard the Duck (talk) 20:36, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :You can report it if you want. Howard the Duck ROY is WAR Talk! 22:31, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
  • ::Absolutely no remorse. Howard the Duck (talk) 22:40, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Oppose Mikha. Mikha is an alternate transliteration of Micah ({{langx|he|מִיכָה|translit=Mikhah}}); It should either be a DAB page or a redirect to Micah. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 15:00, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :However, there is no competition of "Mikha". Just like what did on Jhoanna, just put a hatnote for similar name. I suggest to redirect Mikha (name)Micah and add a redirect category shell of {{R from alternative spelling}}. 'Cause Mikha are no competition title except if the alt spelling of Micah. However, in my opinion, it seems not inappropriate 'cause it is Mikha and will change to Micah. It can be little confusion because of Philippine English, it maybe on Default English which is American English are Mee-kuh or My-kuh, On Philippine English, the pronunciation is Mee-kah. But, if you want to DAB the Mikha or redirect to Micah, technically no per WP:COMMONAMES. I do not recommend too to change the title to Bini Mikha, it will looks like a Fandom site or being WP:FANCRUFT. I mean, why will redirect to a less notability than to a more notability just because it is an alternative spelling? ROY is WAR Talk! 15:59, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
  • ::I do considerate to redirect Bini MikhaMikha (singer) since it was a stage name. It can be added as {{R from stage name}}. And I think it is a unambiguous and there is not competition about "Mikha".ROY is WAR Talk! 16:04, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Strongly Oppose Gwen. Clearly not the primary topic. Neutral on the others. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :Thank you. I doubt on Gwen, so, I accept that she will not move. ROY is WAR Talk! 16:00, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

:Notice on a parallel RM. Those who oppose the move of the members listed on this RM should also participate in Talk:Maloi (singer)#Requested move 27 January 2025 if they'd support or oppose moving that article as well. Howard the Duck (talk) 15:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Oppose as to all due to WP:RECENTISM. The novelty of a currently popular group may not prove sustainable in the long term. We should wait a few years and see how this develops. BD2412 T 20:42, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

What to do with article names of other members?

With the RM above being decided, and regardless if individual members are notable enough, there is still one RM pending, and two successful RMs for Aiah and Jhoanna, the latter which I opposed. This RM had a higher quorum than the other three, and I'd wonder what should be done on the 2 already successfully moved RMs? I've argued on Jhoanna that as an alternate spelling it should redirect to Joanna, but was outvoted on that article, and on WT:POFR#Alternate spellings of given names, they mostly agreed unless it involves Jews. (Now, the relevant bullet point on WP:POFR has to be changed, but that's a discussion elsewhere.)

Aiah came from Mariah, and anyone can argue it is an alternate spelling of Aya (given name). "Aiah" is a nickname (i.e. not a name given to a child at birth), so is not discussed on that article, but that article lists out alternate spellings, but not "Aiah".

As more people were involved here, would it be open a new RM on Aiah and Jhoanna or let it sit out for a while? Howard the Duck (talk) 16:52, 12 February 2025 (UTC)