Talk:Biotin#GA Review

{{Article history

|action1=GAN |action1date=17 February 2021 |action1link=Talk:Biotin/GA1 |action1result=listed |action1oldid=1007381811

|currentstatus=GA |topic=biology

|dykdate=4 March 2021 |dykentry=... that biotin has been proven to benefit hoof health in cattle and horses, but evidence for human nail health is very weak? |dyknom=Template:Did you know nominations/Biotin

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Chemicals|core|importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Molecular Biology|MCB=yes|MCB-importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Dietary Supplements|importance=high}}

}}

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis

| age=9600

| archiveprefix=Talk:Biotin/Archive

| numberstart=1

| maxarchsize=75000

| header={{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minkeepthreads=5

| minarchthreads=2

| format= %%i

}}

{{Archives}}

Did you know nomination

{{Did you know nominations/Biotin}}

This vitamin mentioned in [[Wonder Woman 1984]].

Please create Popular Culture section and mentioned that vitamin referred in Wonder Woman 1984 film. [https://archive.is/64JsZ Proof] Rizosome (talk) 06:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

:To paraphrase deceased comedian Rodney Dangerfield "Biotin don't get no respect!" Unlike vitamin C and vitamin B12, it has been obscure as a dietary supplement. No shady doctors giving celebrities biotin injections. In my opinion, getting a name mention in the Wonder Woman film is not enough to catapult it into the popular culture limelight. David notMD (talk) 08:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Change "Source" Section to "Food Sources" + Cornflakes question

Hi all,

First, must I say this is a very interesting and informative article. To those editing, kudos!

Would it be a better idea to change the Heading wording of the section "Source" where it mentions the biotin amount found in food (microgram/100 g). To me, the title works but seems off as "Sources" are used most frequently only for sources for citations.

Additionally, in the food section, would it be smarter to edit the corn link to the corn flakes link as the "corn flakes cereal" section refers to the cereal and not to corn (maize) itself.

Best,

Ed0578 (talk) 22:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

:The sections have been edited! Best, Ed0578 (talk) 03:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

:Is reference to Corn really useful? Often, cereals are added with such vitamins, and therefore it is not a natural source. Such small amounts are well within the definition of "trace amounts" and does not apport significant quantities to one's diet. I would suggest removing the "corn flakes cereal" as a whole.

:Best regards, Darkalkemy (talk) 08:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Lede too short

The Lede is too short for a GA. David notMD (talk) 11:08, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Latest edit is formatted wrong needs fixing

The latest edit apparently sought to add 'vitamin H' to the description of Biotin in addition to B7 which is great, but it's formatted wrong and now says vitamin B and H7 instead of B7 and H. It needs fixing. It's been so long since I edited anything on here I've forgotten even something as simple as this, so could someone please be kind enough to remedy this. Ty. Taurusthecat (talk) 03:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

{{done}}. We follow ODS/NIH terminology, see Ref. #1. Zefr (talk) 03:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

:TY. Taurusthecat (talk) 07:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)