Talk:Black supremacy#rfc 6593ADA

One of the article's category is entitled "Black Power", the other is titled "Discrimination".

Is "Black Supremacy" somewhat morally acceptable, but "White Supremacy" isn't?

Interesting POV, wikipedia. 2A0D:3344:231D:9C10:1C38:79F4:AC1E:8151 (talk) 03:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

:this is wikipedia, unfortunetaly you need to get used to it, i recommend conservapedia VerseWiki (talk) 00:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

:All the evidence is that Black supremacy barely exists outside of a small amount of offensive rhetoric, which is usually reactive, rather than active. So the question as to whether the white/black variant is more offensive is fairly academic. Is a woman raping a man as offensive as the other way round? Outside instances of statutory rape (an adult woman with a legally child male), it hardly ever happens. You need to hold the power for supremacism to be more than offensive talk. Pincrete (talk) 05:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

I've just re-added the discrimination sidebar template to the article, and I've looked through the edit history to see that certain editors have, in the past, removed both the discrimination template at the end of the article as well as the discrimination sidebar template.

Whether or not editors believe that Black supremacy falls under 'racism' or not doesn't matter. The purpose of sidebar templates is to highlight that articles are part of a series and to allow for easy navigation between related topics. If Wikipedia and its editors have decided that the sidebar includes Black supremacy, then the Black supremacy article will include the sidebar template.

I've looked through numerous "supremacy" articles, including Supremacism, Aryanism, Autistic supremacism, White supremacy and they have the discrimination sidebar as well. What concerns me the most is that there was little to no justification offered by the editors in their removal of the template, and the arguments that were given were largely irrelevant to whether or not the template should be included in the first place.

I hope that there will come an understanding after this of the purpose of sidebar templates. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 22:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

:If we add the discrimination sidebar or footer here, we need reliable sources stating that "Black supremacy" is a sort of discrimination. Rsk6400 (talk) 06:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

::The discrimination sidebar includes Black supremacy. If you want to object to its inclusion in the article, then start a topic on its talk page. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 20:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)