Talk:Blake Treinen#Prophet of God article

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blake Treinen. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=791662598 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131009175509/http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/nationals-watch/2013/jan/16/scouting-reports-return-michael-morse-trade-j-cole/ to http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/nationals-watch/2013/jan/16/scouting-reports-return-michael-morse-trade-j-cole/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

@Muboshgu, @Ac94133, I see link to the article "[https://www.sfgate.com/giants/article/Dodgers-pitcher-Blake-Treinen-ig-prophet-of-god-16525068.php Dodgers pitcher Blake Treinen is now promoting 'prophet of God' who took credit for Jan. 6 riots]" has been removed and BLP is vaguely mentioned. Given the sourced reference, what would be the issue with including? | MK17b | (talk) 04:46, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

:{{u|Mk17b}}, it's a potentially sensitive issue involving BLPs and post-1992 U.S. politics. Consensus needs to build to include it, not exclude. I'm not against it being included, I was acting (small-c) conservatively on BLP. If it goes back into the article, we should write appropriately, not with inappropriate language like {{tq| far-right crank}} – Muboshgu (talk) 05:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

::Sure far right crank doesn't belong (didn't notice that wording previously as I didn't look closely at the included language). But I think a measured paragraph using the sourced article wouldn't be out of line or violating any Wikipedia rules without necessarily needing to build any wide consensus. Unless there are clear objections explaining why it doesn't belong. At least that's how I see it. | MK17b | (talk) 00:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

:::I'd like to see what wording you are proposing before deciding if it belongs... he isn't a political figure so not sure that everything he promotes on instagram is notable.. and mentioning it here would only drive more attention to what is a pretty fringe group. Spanneraol (talk) 01:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)