Talk:Boris Ovcin

His article is already in-depth and meets WP:SPORTSBASIC. That said, I found [https://web.archive.org/web/20171025184703/http://www.footballfedvic.com.au/the-world-according-to-boris/], [https://www.thestar.com.my/sport/other-sport/2004/05/24/midfielder-ovcin-set-to-get-the-sack-from-penang/], [https://archive.ph/TTYlL], [https://archive.ph/OGFii], [https://archive.ph/kheHs], [https://archive.ph/ibUF4], [https://www.thestar.com.my/sport/other-sport/2004/02/22/melnikov-and-ovcin-combine-to-hand-kedah-second-defeat/], [https://archive.ph/W3IQW], [https://www.thestar.com.my/sport/other-sport/2004/06/04/aussie-ovcin-given-the-boot-by-penang/], https://archive.ph/aU24j], [https://archive.ph/EHf3l], [https://archive.ph/YnlsT], [https://archive.ph/LfXbR], [https://archive.ph/wip/mkNfK], [https://archive.ph/mmyIQ], [https://archive.ph/BgxWU], and [https://www.newspapers.com/search/?query=%22Boris%20Ovcin%22], among many many more sources. Definelty has off-line sources, having been clear topic of interest in Australian league football with extensive carer including playing in fully pro Malaysian Super League. Wikipedia is supposed to be a source of knowledge, and this article is a "yes" to [[Wikipedia:The one question. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Regarding most of the consistent pro-deletion users, I dont understand why they spend all their effort deleting other peoples honest hard work instead of improving them, especially most pro-deletion users I have encountered who have a double standard where they either support Wikipedia:SNG where the article doesn't need to meet WP:GNG or have sometimes created articles of people with less coverage than this one. (I support article creation, but many pro-deletion users double standard is very frustrating). Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

:A significant number of these links lead to archived snapshots of Google Translate pages. I have no idea what to make of this. Dr. Duh 🩺 (talk) 14:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

:Thank you for adding to your original comment, but I still don't understand what these archived pages (such as [https://archive.ph/TTYlL [3]]) represent, or where those texts originally come from, which is naturally information that is needed when one is supposed to estimate their relevance. Dr. Duh 🩺 (talk) 12:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)