Talk:Brazil#The heart of this Case

{{Article history

|action1=GAN

|action1date=02:39, 16 December 2005

|action1link=

|action1result=listed

|action1oldid=31516584

|action2=GAR

|action2date=21:22, 14 September 2006

|action2link=Talk:Brazil/Archive 2#Delisted GA

|action2result=delisted

|action2oldid=75341501

|action3=FAC

|action3date=17:57, 18 December 2006

|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Brazil/archive1

|action3result=failed

|action3oldid=95121865

|action4=GAN

|action4date=14:33, 7 May 2007

|action4link=Talk:Brazil/Archive 2#Passed GA

|action4result=listed

|action4oldid=128902215

|action5=GAR

|action5date=03:42, 11 May 2007

|action5link=Wikipedia:Good article review/Archive 18#Brazil

|action5result=delisted

|action5oldid=130215626

|action6=FAC

|action6date=00:11, 12 May 2007

|action6link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Brazil/archive2

|action6result=not promoted

|action6oldid=130215626

|action7=GAN

|action7date=02:35, 12 May 2007

|action7link=Talk:Brazil/Archive_2#GA_Failed:_Notes_for_fixes

|action7result=failed

|action7oldid=130215626

|action8=GAN

|action8date=28 June 2007

|action8link=Talk:Brazil/Archive 3#Fourth GA review

|action8result=failed

|action8oldid=141209638

|action9=GAN

|action9date=21 August 2007

|action9link=Talk:Brazil/Archive 4#GA Review

|action9result=listed

|action9oldid=152728135

|action10=FAC

|action10date=00:02, 5 June 2008

|action10link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Brazil/archive3

|action10result=not promoted

|action10oldid=217073915

|action11=GAR

|action11date=23:55, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

|action11link=Talk:Brazil/GA1

|action11result=delisted

|action11oldid=260390040

|action12=FAC

|action12date=10:01, 02 January 2014

|action12link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Brazil/archive4

|action12result=not promoted

|action12oldid=588633598

|currentstatus=DGA

|topic=geography

|otd1date=2004-09-07|otd1oldid=9704828

|otd2date=2005-09-07|otd2oldid=22805037

|otd3date=2006-09-07|otd3oldid=74305464

|otd4date=2007-09-07|otd4oldid=156286350

|otd5date=2008-09-07|otd5oldid=236671325

|otd6date=2009-09-07|otd6oldid=311957522

|otd7date=2012-11-15|otd7oldid=522953475

|otd8date=2013-11-15|otd8oldid=581594348

|otd9date=2014-11-15|otd9oldid=633898872

|otd10date=2015-11-15|otd10oldid=690429313

|otd11date=2016-11-15|otd11oldid=749619653

|otd12date=2017-11-15|otd12oldid=810443871

|otd13date=2018-11-15|otd13oldid=868978253

|otd14date=2019-11-15|otd14oldid=925936561

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes |class=B |vital=yes |1=

}}{{Copied

| from = Tourism in Brazil

| from_oldid = 246592471

| to = Brazil

| to_diff = 248478481

| date = 29 October 2008

}}

{{Banner holder |collapsed=yes|1=

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 100K

|counter = 17

|algo = old(90d)

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|archive = Talk:Brazil/Archive %(counter)d

}}

Grammatical error in Demographics

"Outside in the Arab world, Brazil also has the largest population of Arab ancestry in the world, with 15–20 million people." should be "Outside of the Arab world, Brazil also has the largest population of Arab ancestry in the world, with 15–20 million people."

I'd edit it myself but I don't have access yet. Bearfrost (talk) 18:28, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

:Hello! I have edited the page with the suggested change. Thanks for noticing. G4B-XD-3l (talk) 20:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

:Why not? 172.115.227.234 (talk) 16:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Population

The current size of population in Brazil is about 205 million people, based on the recent population census. The earlier estimate of 212 million people is no longer valid. Corrections needed! 91.65.109.170 (talk) 07:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

The Brazilian media lies and omits data.

"Want to know the truth? Come here and I’ll tell you:

Let’s start with the basics: Brazil’s GDP. The real situation about this indicator is often omitted, and the data provided by the Central Bank is not legitimate. There is also manipulation of the information, which results in abusive pricing in bilateral relations. The data presented is inconsistent with the actual costs of imports and labor, and it doesn’t accurately reflect what is spent to set the final price of products.

Another major issue is the lack of transparency regarding the base prices of our products and natural resources. Our regulatory agency only allows us to know the base price of the pharmaceutical industry. We have no access to the real prices in other sectors. As a result, the concept of "suggested retail price" was created on product labels, a value that is often not followed by any establishment. Additionally, there is no actual regulatory body that defines and monitors the true prices of these products." VecJoga (talk) 01:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

:@VecJoga Have any reliable sources to back that up? GiftedWithThought (talk) 04:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Em relação aos dados sobre IDH e GINI precisam ser atualizado pois são de 2022, e já estamos em 2025

Atualização dos dados IDh e GINI que são de 2022 191.9.40.140 (talk) 17:38, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 March 2025

Change "Brazil has a diverse wildlife" to "Brazil has diverse wildlife" (in intro section) Smelliotcobb (talk) 18:45, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

:{{already done}} by another editor. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 15:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)