Talk:Brexit#Need to split this article

{{Skip to talk}}

{{Talk header}}

{{Controversial}}

{{Calm}}

{{Not a forum}}

{{British English}}

{{Article history

|itn1date=28 August 2019|itn1link=Special:PermanentLink/912889854

|itn2date=20 October 2019|itn2link=Special:PermanentLink/922195549

|itn3date=31 January 2020|itn3link=Special:PermanentLink/938558671

|otd1date=2019-06-23|otd1oldid=903014427

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject European Union|importance=high}}

{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|importance=top}}

{{WikiProject International relations|importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums}}

{{WikiProject United Kingdom|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Economics|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Law|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject 2010s|importance=Top}}

{{WikiProject European history|importance=Top}}

}}

{{Press|url=https://www.wired.co.uk/article/brexit-wikipedia-page-battles |title=A bitter turf war is raging on the Brexit Wikipedia page |last=Reynolds |first=Matt |date=2019-04-29 |work=Wired|quote=While Westminster remains mired in endless Brexit deadlock, over on the Brexit Wikipedia page things are even less amicable. Editors are parrying death threats, doxxing attempts and accusations of bias, as the crowdsourced epic has become the centre of a relentless tug-of-war over who gets to write the history of the UK as it happens.}}

{{banner holder |collapsed=yes |1=

{{Annual readership|scale=log}}

{{Top 25 Report|Jun 19 2016 (5th)|Jun 26 2016 (25th)}}

{{refideas| [https://www.npr.org/2021/04/09/985660326/violent-protests-over-brexit-continue-in-belfast Violent Protests Over Brexit Continue In Belfast]}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}

|maxarchivesize = 150K

|counter = 10

|minthreadsleft = 3

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(30d)

|archive = Talk:Brexit/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

|target=Talk:Brexit/Archive index

|mask=Talk:Brexit/Archive <#>

|leading_zeros=0

|indexhere=yes

}}

Remove "Inpact" section?

This section is unavoidably OR because the assertions in it, although cited, are subjectively selected. It seems to me that if the section is to stand, it must be based on npov and rs assessments which, imo, won't and can't exist before 2036 at the earliest, 2091 is if Rees-Mogg is correct.

I propose that we delete it. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

:UNsure but agree we should not use any sources published within (say) 10 years of Brexit, as this should be a historical overview of its impacts. Slatersteven (talk) 15:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

:I know that there are many aspects of Brexit that are not yet clear, but even so, many people will want to know immediately what the impact is already. Therefore, I think we should leave this section for the time being and discuss it again once about three months have passed. LendingNext (talk) 15:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

"[[:British independent]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]

30px

The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_independent&redirect=no British independent] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 18#British independent}} until a consensus is reached. A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

European electricity market

I would have thought the UK's continued participation in the European electricity market warrants a sentence? RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 21:42, 3 May 2025 (UTC)