Talk:Buzzword

{{afd-merged-from|List of buzzwords|List of buzzwords (2nd nomination)|27 October 2020}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=

{{WikiProject Business|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Linguistics|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Marketing & Advertising|importance=High}}

}}

{{Old AfD multi| date = 31 January 2015 (UTC) | result = keep | page = Buzzword }}

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Buzzword/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}

Merge from [[Buzzword bingo]]

{{discussion top|result=The result of the discussion was not merged. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)}}

I have major concerns whether Buzzword bingo is a notable concept, but instead of trial by fire at AfD, how about we consider merging it here first? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

  • Oppose, given that the referenced support independent notability. Klbrain (talk) 17:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Agreement with @Klbrain. They are two different topics, and cannot mutually support each other in one article. I also disagree that it is a article suitable for AfD, as it seems to be a notable topic and has a quite few references. Apologies for the late reply. Explodicator7331 (talk) 19:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Oppose per previous arguments. The topic is different and both are notable. PhotographyEdits (talk) 12:33, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

{{discussion bottom}}

Cleanup

I've boldly removed the unreferenced terms from this list, since they're apparently words that someone was tired of hearing at the moment and not anchored in any linguistic analysis or critical review. -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:00, 3 April 2023 (UTC)