Talk:Carina Axelsson

I don't think the blog sources qualify as reliable sources for WP:RS. I'd like the editor who added them to explain his reasoning. But there are a lot of such sources out there, and the material shouldn't be deleted from the article without {{fact}} tagging, which I'll do if there's isn't an explanation in a reasonable time, and an opportunity for improvement. Material bearing on notability should be erased while an AFD is going on, but the sourcing should be clarified. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:40, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

How on earth is four votes to keep and three votes to delete a consensus for "Keep"? Hell, two of the four "Keep" votes come from editors who vote keep on virtually every single AFD they participate in, no matter how obviously they fail Wikipedia criteria... they might as well be bots. It either should have been relisted to get more input or closed as "no consensus". DreamGuy (talk) 22:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

I really can't believe this is still here - with the exception of the New York Times article, they are ALL blogs and fan sites! But one particular fan just keeps this one rocking. I edited to include some cautions about the sources. And why her fan (or maybe she's doing it herself) keeps insisting that she was born in Sweden is beyond me. California Public Records clearly show otherwise, and it's yet another example of the kind of pink press that this girl and her boyfriend like to promote about her. I'm specifically not linking the CPR to Wiki because I think privacy is important to anyone; if someone is stalker-y enough to research the records themselves, power to them.

I can do the "citation" needed thing if someone will post the code here. PR (talk) 20:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

royalandco.wordpress.com is not a reliable source, as it's just a personal blog, and thus fails WP:RS quite dramatically. DreamGuy (talk) 14:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

:Other 3O: Agreed. Blogs are not acceptable as WP:RS; see WP:SPS for more. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 18:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

A third opinion is called for when two editors dispute something. There seem to be several editors here who all agree that blogs are not WP:RS (I concur about that particular blog). Where's the dispute? --RegentsPark (My narrowboat) 18:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

:Well, there were only two editors recently active when I posted the 3O. People had in the past been clear, but an edit was still ignoring it. The person who put those WP:RS-violating content there has been edit warring over it recently, despite knowing during the AFD and since that the sources are not considered reliable. I was hoping we'd force the editor to give up his edit warring and bow to consensus. DreamGuy (talk) 19:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

::It seems clear that there is consensus. If the editor persists in edit warring, you can warn him/her that he/she could be blocked and, if edit warring continues, report the editor to the editwarring notice board (or bring the matter to the attention of an uninvolved admin).--RegentsPark (My narrowboat) 20:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Because it really should be. Sleeping with a very minor prince is absurdly non-notable. Heck, I've done it myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ProperlyRaised (talk • contribs) 17:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on Carina Axelsson. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=749601449 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141030025635/http://www.carinaaxelsson.com:80/about-carina to http://www.carinaaxelsson.com/about-carina

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

• {{Cite web |title=HRH Princess Benedikte |url=https://www.kongehuset.dk/en/the-royal-family/hrh-princess-benedikte/ |access-date=2023-07-26 |website=www.kongehuset.dk}}
• {{Cite web |title=TH Prince Gustav and Princess Carina have had a son |url=https://www.kongehuset.dk/en/news/th-prince-gustav-and-princess-carina-have-a-son |access-date=2023-07-26 |website=www.kongehuset.dk}}

Mirrorthesoul (talk) 22:44, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

• Oppose. The article should be at her common name: [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Carina+Axelsson%22+-wikipedia&start=80 84 ghits for "Carina Axelsson"], compared to [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Carina,+Princess+of+Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg%22+-wikipedia&start=10 13 ghits for "Carina, Princess of Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg"] (none of which are Wikipedia:Reliable sources). DrKay (talk) 08:14, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
• Oppose As per DrKay, we should follow WP:COMMONNAME. Edwardx (talk) 09:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC)