Talk:Carmichael number

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|

{{WikiProject Mathematics|priority=mid}}

}}

{{annual readership|scale=log}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| algo = old(365d)

| archive = Talk:Carmichael number/Archive %(counter)d

| counter = 1

| maxarchivesize = 150K

| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| minthreadsleft = 5

}}

{{Archive box |search=yes |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=12 |units=months |auto=yes }}

Delete table with n and k values

In the section on "Distribution", the table with n and k values is not really useful, and should probably be deleted. This table takes Erdo"s's expression,

:C(X) < X \exp\left(\frac{-k_2 \log X \log \log \log X}{\log \log X}\right)

and fits k_2 values to it, for x \le 10^{21}. These values may, indeed, fit the limited data up to this point. There are two problems: The minor problem is that Erdo"s's expression is not meant to be an accurate estimate, just an asymptotic upper bound. But the main problem is that \log \log \log X grows so slowly that even x = 10^{21} is still quite small. With this limited data, we still have no idea what the final asymptotic value of k_2 in Erdo"s's expression would be, even if this expression is the correct asymptotic upper bound. MathPerson (talk) 13:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

:I agree and I have deleted the table.—Anita5192 (talk) 17:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Incorrect description of Fermats Little Theorem

The description in the overview states that "the number b^p − p is an integer multiple of p" but I think it should read b^p - b. Lliht (talk) 08:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

punctuation

The period should be removed from right after the equation before the following:

"for all integers which are relatively prime to...." 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:8CCE:D7E6:36D5:D9E7 (talk) 15:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)