Talk:Cash Cash

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cash Cash. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=793270618 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150417180103/http://audiocrushpr.com/?p=469 to http://audiocrushpr.com/?p=469
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100304100337/http://www.hiponline.com/6134/cash-cash-biography.html to http://www.hiponline.com/6134/cash-cash-biography.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Cash Cash's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "bpi":

• From Andy Grammer: {{cite certification|region=United Kingdom|type=single|artist=Andy Grammer|access-date=June 27, 2017}}
• From Pink discography: {{cite web|url=https://www.bpi.co.uk/brit-certified/|title=BRIT Certified - P!nk|publisher=British Phonographic Industry|format=Enter "P!nk" into the "Keywords" box, then select "Search".|access-date=April 10, 2020}}
• From Christina Perri discography: {{cite web|url=http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx |title=BPI Certified Awards |publisher=British Phonographic Industry |accessdate=October 29, 2011 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604040853/http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx |archivedate=June 4, 2011 |df=mdy }}

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:18, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

I think it’s very misleading to have the years active start date be 2002 and not 2007 which is the actual formation of Cash Cash. The Consequence was a different band with different members and a completely different sound. I agree it should be spoken about in their history to show how the band came to be, but for instance you wouldn’t put the start date of Pearl Jam’s first band Mother Love Bone on Pearl Jam’s wiki page, you would just include it in their bio. The same thing applies here. 2007 is a more appropriate “years active” start date given the context of this group. It’s misleading and leads people to thinking Cash Cash was started in 2002 and is way older than it actually is. 2point5ken (talk) 22:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

:Agreed, that's how it's usually handled. Third Eye Blind is similar. The lead singer wrote their biggest hit before the band formed, but we don't add that as part of the "years active". Sergecross73 msg me 19:08, 15 September 2022 (UTC)