Talk:Center on Wisconsin Strategy#reqmovetag

:The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not moved. There is clear consensus against the proposed move. bd2412 T 03:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

:Center on Wisconsin Strategy → {{no redirect|COWS}} – Per WP:ACRONYMTITLE Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 14:50, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

• Oppose see Caloric reflex test per Harrison's Neurology in Clinical Medicine "The acronym “COWS” has been used to remind generations of medical students of the direction of nystagmus—“cold water opposite, warm water same”) In ictu oculi (talk) 16:24, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose per above as well as 'Cow' or 'Cows' now link to Cattle, which would be the primary for both words. COWS means nothing to most people, except as multiple cows, while 'Center on Wisconsin Strategy' is self-descriptive and understandable. Randy Kryn (talk) 19:55, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose – WP:ACRONYMTITLE says: "In general, if readers somewhat familiar with the subject are likely to only recognise the name by its acronym, then the acronym should be used as a title." I doubt anyone would see "COWS" and immediately think of the Center on Wisconsin Strategy. V2Blast (talk) 09:15, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

:*{{re|V2Blast}} Well, it is what Acronym Finder and Abbreviations.com find. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 10:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.