Talk:Chris Redfield

{{Article history

| action1 = AFD

| action1date = 21 January 2008

| action1link = Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Redfield

| action1result = Keep

| action1oldid = 185964202

| action2 = GAN

| action2date = 02:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

| action2link = Talk:Chris Redfield/GA1

| action2result = listed

| action2oldid = 767637794

| action3 = WPR

| action3date = 10:24, 29 March 2024

| action3link = WP:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors

| action3result = copyedited

| action3oldid = 1216145880

| action4 = WPR

| action4date = 10:40, 14 December 2024

| action4link = WP:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors

| action4result = copyedited

| action4oldid = 1263042538

| action5=PR

| action5date=18 December 2024

| action5link= Wikipedia:Peer review/Chris Redfield/archive1

| action5result=reviewed

| action5oldid=1262871723

| dykdate = 12 March 2017

| dykentry = ... that video game character Chris Redfield was suspected of abusing steroids?

| dyknom = Template:Did you know nominations/Chris Redfield

| collapse = yes

|action6 = FAC

|action6date = 2025-01-08

|action6link = Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Chris Redfield/archive1

|action6result = promoted

|action6oldid = 1268214901

| currentstatus = FA

| topic = Video games

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class = FA|collapsed=yes|listas=Redfield, Chris|1=

{{WikiProject Video games|importance=high|Characters=yes|characters-importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Dhtwiki|date=December 12–14, 2024}}

}}

{{Ref ideas|1=https://books.google.com.ph/books?id=wo07EAAAQBAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT62&dq=jill+valentine&hl=en&source=gb_mobile_entity&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=jill%20valentine&f=false}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 150K

|counter = 2

|minthreadsleft = 3

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(30d)

|archive = Talk:Chris Redfield/Archive %(counter)d

}}

Handbook of Sex and Sexuality bit

I'll admit, the last few sentence from Paragraph 1 of the "Reception" section dicussing the views of the digital media scholars are quite confusing and definitely have to be reworded. For example, how can Chris be an "ambiguously good or bad character"? And when it says "serves as part of his absolution", does that mean in terms of him "serving" in the military/army?

The whole thing is worded in a very confusing manner. {{ping|Boneless Pizza!}}, do you have access to the whole chapter this information comes from? Because even when looking at the original quote, the whole thing still seems to be lacking in the context necessary to fully understand. PanagiotisZois (talk) 16:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

:Hi@PanagiotisZois. It's page 243 [https://www.google.com.ph/books/edition/The_Bloomsbury_Handbook_of_Sex_and_Sexua/wqouEQAAQBAJ?hl=de&gbpv=1], but I couldn't access to it and its just a preview. I decided remove it I guess since its hard to access. However, we have another book that we cab access abd added content, it's here BP!🍕 (🔔) 20:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

::I would like to help, but going through the full quote, I still can't understand everything, as I'm missing the context it's written in. Are the two scholars talking about soldier-like characters here and the military-industrial complex? That would help them referring to Chris as an "ambiguously good or evil character" and him "serving". PanagiotisZois (talk) 20:19, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

:::PanagiotisZois Found the full page here [https://books.google.com.ph/books?id=wqouEQAAQBAJ&pg=PA243&q=Redfield&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false] 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 23:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)