Talk:Claremont Review of Books
{{Old AfD multi|date=11 December 2012 (UTC) |result=speedy keep |page=Claremont Review of Books |date2=5 July 2019 |result2=Keep |page2=Claremont Review of Books (2nd nomination)}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject California|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Magazines|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=mid}}
}}
Advertisement
The paragraph with the quotes praising the Claremont Review reads like an advertisement. Rjhatl (talk) 23:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
:It does, but if I had been asked to write this article and knew of those quotes there is no way I would have left them out. TCR is a truly exceptional publication and I cannot think of a better way to indicate that than by quoting a few of its famous readers. 71.194.39.143 (talk) 08:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Larry Siegel
::This is an atrocious advertorial. No encyclopedic article should consist of a lede paragraph that is basically one enormous quote from the subject of the article itself. And it goes without saying, the rest is just as bad.
::::104.128.253.230 (talk) 23:31, 17 March 2016 (UTC)