Talk:Cobra (programming language)
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Unknown |software=y |software-importance=Unknown}}
{{WikiProject Microsoft |importance=Unknown |net=yes |net-importance=mid}}
}}
{{Connected contributor
| User1 = ChuckEsterbrook | U1-EH = yes
| User2 = CharlesEsterbrook | U2-EH = yes
}}
Notability
After seeing the "Notability" tag on the page, I have established notability by adding reliable, secondary sources:
- InfoWorld
- ZDNet UK
- MSDN Magazine
- Lang.NET Symposium 2008
and removed the tag.
ChuckEsterbrook (talk) 10:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
:Sorry, but I restored the notability tag. Whatever sources you added, the article says noty a single word why this language is notable. In particular, does anyone uses it besides its developers? Lorem Ip (talk) 15:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Article Name Change
I myself am not a Wikipedia expert, but is "Cobra (programming language from Cobra Language LLC)" an appropriate article name? I looked at the list of programming languages, and several other languages with the words "programming language" parenthesized have no info about the creator/company name in the article name itself. Besides, it takes up extra space when typing it and seems a bit like a sort of "showoff", I don't know the exact term, like a sort of commercialization. Should it be shortened to just "Cobra (programming language)"?
DZGuymed (talk) 23:35, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
:No. The qualifier is necessary to distinguish it from Cobra (programming language from Squeaky Duck) --Cybercobra (talk) 07:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Oh, I didn't see that there was second Cobra language. My bad. DZGuymed (talk) 16:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC)